On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 03:21:38PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Please have a quick glance and come with objections.
> >
> | The math outputstream stuff is still a bit fragile. I've not seen anything
> | in the patch that is likely to break something, but _I_ would not apply
> | perl -pi style changes there.
> 
> I have no idea what "perl -pi style changes" are?

Things like running    perl -pi -e 's:"([a-zA-Z 0-9])":'\1':g' *.[Ch]
modulo proper quoting.

> | This part probably should be reworked to use streambufs properly, but I do
> | not know how to do it.
> 
> The math streams?

Yes, the math streams. Currently they wrap an ostream and implement
operator<< individually to delegate work. This should be done using
streambufs which is said to be the Right Solution.

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Reply via email to