On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:41:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> It looks like this then. OK to commit?
>
> Yes.
>
> JMarc
Done.
- Martin
pgpTpb1fNSI1Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> It looks like this then. OK to commit?
Yes.
JMarc
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 12:51:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> OK, that's easy. There is an LColor::red in insetcharstyle
> Martin> too; shall I change it as well?
>
> Yes, please.
>
> JMarc
It looks like this the
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> OK, that's easy. There is an LColor::red in insetcharstyle
Martin> too; shall I change it as well?
Yes, please.
JMarc
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:32:29AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> However, the attached displays the inset as undefined upon
> Martin> reloading the document, which is the most important situation
> Martin> where a warn
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> However, the attached displays the inset as undefined upon
Martin> reloading the document, which is the most important situation
Martin> where a warning is called for.
Does not look bad. However, please avoid to use explicit col
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> However, the attached displays the inset as undefined upon
Martin> reloading the document, which is the most important situation
Martin> where a warning is called for.
OK.
JMarc
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 10:42 +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Yes. And the inset should be set to the undefined state immediately after
>> a branch is deleted and after a copy from a different document. Is that
>> difficult to implement?
>
> Doesn't appear to be straightforward.
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 10:42 +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
...
> > We have to somehow handle the situation where a branch inset is in a
> > document for which the branch is not defined. In CharStyle you created a
> > method setUndefined, which prefixed the button text with "Undef:"
>
> Did I? I don't
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I mean: (1) define a branch, (2) insert a branch inset of that branch,
> and (3) delete the branch definition again.
OK, now I understand. IMHO (3) should not be possible if there are still
branch insets, or it should at least ask for confirmation.
> Hmmm, one can call th
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Georg> Can you explain what you mean by 'from underneath'? IMO the
> Georg> general problem here is that a child document does not know if
> Georg> it has a parent and which document that parent actually is. We
> Georg> see the same problem with citations and cross re
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 09:00 +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:06:40PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Of course, then if you load the child document alone, the branches
> >> will not be known and will display black...
> >
> > A special case
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:06:40PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>> wrote:
>>> Of course, then if you load the child document alone, the branches
>>> will not be known and will display black...
>> A special case
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:06:40PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Of course, then if you load the child document alone, the branches
>> will not be known and will display black...
>
> A special case of a more general problem. Insert branch insets of a
> branch and t
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What do you think. Should I apply this?
Martin> Yes, I think so.
Done.
JMarc
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 06:08:48PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:20:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The attached additional patch places the master doc's branches at least
> on the menu tree within the child.
>
> - Martin
Ignore this :-)
- Martin
pgpuL1
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:06:40PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Yes, this seems to work... at least when outputting to LaTeX.
>
> Martin> The funny thing is, you have to independently define the
> Martin> branches in
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:20:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Another bug that is not too difficult to fix. The only remaining
> problem I see is that the brach list that is seen in the child
> document settings is not the right one. This is a general problem with
> child documents and
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Yes, this seems to work... at least when outputting to LaTeX.
Martin> The funny thing is, you have to independently define the
Martin> branches in the child document (as you say), and then create
Martin> branch insets there. But
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:20:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Another bug that is not too difficult to fix. The only remaining
> problem I see is that the brach list that is seen in the child
> document settings is not the right one. This is a general problem with
> child documents and
Another bug that is not too difficult to fix. The only remaining
problem I see is that the brach list that is seen in the child
document settings is not the right one. This is a general problem with
child documents and buffer settings, anyway.
Martin, could you take a quick look please?
JMarc
I
21 matches
Mail list logo
