>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Martin> Yes, this seems to work... at least when outputting to LaTeX.

Martin> The funny thing is, you have to independently define the
Martin> branches in the child document (as you say), and then create
Martin> branch insets there. But if you then just remove the branches
Martin> again, it just continues working ;-)

No, if you load the master file, typeset it (or load the child
document from the Include inset), then insert>branch in the child sees
the branches of the master document.

Of course, then if you load the child document alone, the branches
will not be known and will display black...

What do you think. Should I apply this? 

JMarc

Reply via email to