Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Is what's troubling you the lack of margin?
>>
> Yes. Your screenshot looks good.
Committed.
Richard
--
==
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
=
Richard Heck wrote:
> I committed the grid version, so that's probably what you're seeing.
Yes.
> Is what's troubling you the lack of margin?
Yes.
> I agree that looks less than
> perfect and would be happy to add some, thus:
>
> screenshot
Your screenshot looks good. I wonder, though, why
I committed the grid version, so that's probably what you're seeing. Is
what's troubling you the lack of margin? I agree that looks less than
perfect and would be happy to add some, thus:
Richard
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Try the attached. It retains the ex
Richard Heck wrote:
> Try the attached. It retains the existing layout but sets a different
> size policy. But I can do a grid if you prefer.
I'd prefer a grid.
I've attached a screenshot of how it looks like now.
Jürgen
lyx1.png
Description: PNG image
Try the attached. It retains the existing layout but sets a different
size policy. But I can do a grid if you prefer.
rh
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> Attached is a patch fixing bug 1550. It pre-empts my previous effort,
>> using radio buttons, as suggested by Abdel a
Richard Heck wrote:
> Attached is a patch fixing bug 1550. It pre-empts my previous effort,
> using radio buttons, as suggested by Abdel and JMarc, among others,
> rather than a combo box, as previously.
Could you please layout the dialog in a grid? As it is now, it can be shrinked
to almost zero
Quoting Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> One question: I would have preferred to make QParagraph::radioMap const
> >> but couldn't, because it can only be populated after the dialog is
> >> created. Any other ideas?
> >>
> > I think we don't really need this QPRadi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> One question: I would have preferred to make QParagraph::radioMap const
>> but couldn't, because it can only be populated after the dialog is
>> created. Any other ideas?
>>
> I think we don't really need this QPRadioMap. We have only 4 radio buttons,
> why
> don't
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
> > I propose that you commit your patch (taking into account my comments
> below)
> > with the modal dialog. Then, I'll help you fixing this update issue.
>
> Here's a cleanup patch based on yours.
The patch.
ParagraphDialog_abdel.di
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I propose that you commit your patch (taking into account my comments below)
> with the modal dialog. Then, I'll help you fixing this update issue.
Here's a cleanup patch based on yours.
Abdel.
Richard Heck wrote:
> Attached is a patch fixing bug 1550. It pre-empts my previous effort,
> using radio buttons, as suggested by Abdel and JMarc, among others,
> rather than a combo box, as previously.
Very good work Richard! Thanks for doing this.
>
> This patch makes the dialog modal, for the
Attached is a patch fixing bug 1550. It pre-empts my previous effort,
using radio buttons, as suggested by Abdel and JMarc, among others,
rather than a combo box, as previously.
This patch makes the dialog modal, for the present. This is not the
ideal solution, but the ideal solution is still not
12 matches
Mail list logo