> "Eitan" == Eitan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eitan> --- Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Another possibility would be to just output the content of the
>> field without any label: + if (!annote.empty()) + result << "\n\n"
>> << annote;
>>
Eitan> Good enough for me...
I
Eitan Frachtenberg wrote:
> Hi Angus.
> I've resubscribed to the list with my latest email account. Please use
> this email address on the blanket file (sky8an () gmail ! com), which
> actually does show my family name (Frachtenberg). Thanks,
> --Eitan.
Got it. Thanks, Eitan.
--
Angus
> Hi, Eitan.The entry in blanket-permissions.txt would currently appear as:
>
> Eitan
> See lyx-devel list message entitled "BibTeX annotation support" of 18
> March 2005.
>
> I think it would be better if you had a family name. (Rather, it would be
> better if you told us what your family
Eitan wrote:
>> Fine, and do I have your permission to release this code and later
>> contribution to LyX under the term of the GPL v2 or later?
>
> Certainly. And I hope to have more contributions coming soon :)
Hi, Eitan.The entry in blanket-permissions.txt would currently appear as:
Eitan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> Eitan,
>>
>> I modified your patch a bit (removed rfind usage, tweaked display of
>> annotation).
>>
>> I will commit this soon (to 1.3.x too).
>
> Maybe you should ask him about that general GPL thingy that Angus
> Fine, and do I have your permission to release this code and later
> contribution to LyX under the term of the GPL v2 or later?
Certainly. And I hope to have more contributions coming soon :)
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our n
> "Eitan" == Eitan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eitan> --- Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Another possibility would be to just output the content of the
>> field without any label: + if (!annote.empty()) + result << "\n\n"
>> << annote;
>>
Eitan> Good enough for me...
Fi
--- Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another possibility would be to just output the content of the field
> without any label:
> + if (!annote.empty())
> + result << "\n\n" << annote;
>
Good enough for me...
__
Do
> "Eitan" == Eitan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eitan> --- Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I modified your patch a bit (removed rfind usage, tweaked display
>> of annotation).
Eitan> At the risk of sounding petty, changing "Annote: " to "Note: "
Eitan> might conflict in the
--- Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I modified your patch a bit (removed rfind usage, tweaked display of
> annotation).
At the risk of sounding petty, changing "Annote: " to "Note: " might conflict
in the future if we decide display the BibTeX note field as well.
>
> I will co
--- Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't the test be
> + if (idx == 0 || dummy[idx - 1] != '\\')
> ?
>
Of course - I wasn't even aware that C++ strings have a [] operator (serves me
right for not having used c++ in years :)
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Eitan,
>
> I modified your patch a bit (removed rfind usage, tweaked display of
> annotation).
>
> I will commit this soon (to 1.3.x too).
Maybe you should ask him about that general GPL thingy that Angus (or was
it Andre?) did a little while
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Eitan" == Eitan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eitan> Second try, this time with contextual diff and a changelog.
Eitan> + // Check if this is really a comment or just "\%" + if (idx
Eitan> == 0 || dummy.rfind('\\',idx) !=
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Eitan" == Eitan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Eitan> Second try, this time with contextual diff and a changelog.
>
| Eitan> + // Check if this is really a comment or just "\%"
| Eitan> + if (idx == 0 || dummy.rfind('\\',idx) !=
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Lars, these change seem very reasonable to me, especially the check
> for \% is a real bug fix.
I agree. Unfortunately the homegrown bibtex parser has some more errors, and
we should replace it by something reasonable after 1.4.
Georg
> "Eitan" == Eitan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eitan> Second try, this time with contextual diff and a changelog.
Eitan> +// Check if this is really a comment or just "\%"
Eitan> +if (idx == 0 || dummy.rfind('\\',idx) != idx - 1)
Eitan> +dummy.erase(idx, strin
Second try, this time with contextual diff and a changelog.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ Index: src/frontends/controllers/ChangeLog
==
> "Eitan" == Eitan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eitan> Friends, I have used LyX for ages now, but this is my first
Eitan> patch, so please be kind (i.e., instuctional) if I'm doing this
Eitan> entirely wrong.
Eitan> I'm attaching a tiny patch that will show a BibTeX's entry
Eitan> annotation
Friends,
I have used LyX for ages now, but this is my first patch, so please be kind
(i.e., instuctional) if I'm doing this entirely wrong.
I'm attaching a tiny patch that will show a BibTeX's entry annotation text in
the citation preview dialog. Myself and several other researcher I know
annota
19 matches
Mail list logo
