>>>>> "Eitan" == Eitan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eitan> --- Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I modified your patch a bit (removed rfind usage, tweaked display >> of annotation). Eitan> At the risk of sounding petty, changing "Annote: " to "Note: " Eitan> might conflict in the future if we decide display the BibTeX Eitan> note field as well. That's not petty, I wondered about it too... The fact is, we do not display the name of the bibtex fields and "note" would just be text added to the main block of text. And "Annote:" just looks ugly from an UI point of view (if you put aside the fact that it is the name of the field). Another possibility would be to just output the content of the field without any label: + if (!annote.empty()) + result << "\n\n" << annote; Would you prefer that? JMarc
