Re:Toolbar garbage

2008-08-18 Thread instanton
I also observed some toolbar problem in Rc1, but may not be the same one discussed above. Until Beta4, I can dock the preview/update toolbar next to the standard toolbar, and if I did so, the preview/update toolbar will stay next to the standard toolbar at next startup of LyX. However, in Sc1,

Re: MiKTeX, ghostscript, lmodern and LyX

2008-07-19 Thread instanton
easoning for LyX to install the tex components which it needs. I can just keep interupting the LyX installation process in the future. Thank you very much for all the replies. instanton

Re: Re: MiKTeX, ghostscript, lmodern and LyX

2008-07-19 Thread instanton
installation process while it is downloading lmodern,and then after LyX setup exits, modify configure.py (by commenting out the line which checks lmodern) and then run this script. Can LyX avoid checking lmodern at setup and just display a message somewhere during the setup saying that lmodern is recommended to use LyX? Regards instanton

MiKTeX, ghostscript, lmodern and LyX

2008-07-18 Thread instanton
Hello, I use LyX [1.5.5, 1.6Beta] on top of a small installation of MiKTeX on Windows. For all postscript related tasks I use the internal version of ghostscript (mgs) and it works all the time. However, LyX always install another version of ghostscript which is redundant in my environment. So

Re: Doc problem in Beta4 on Windows

2008-07-18 Thread instanton
important here. I am just used to the way the "official" setup organises its files. However I am also confused with your answer: if the setup searches the system for existing python installation, why does it install another version when I indeed have already installed python myself? Regards instanton

Doc problem in Beta4 on Windows

2008-07-16 Thread instanton
Hello, I installed the Windows version of Beta4 from BerliOS website and got some problem in openning some of the standard documentations. For instance the documents FAQ.lyx and shortcuts.lyx cannot be open in Beta4. It says that the document was prepared by an earlier version of LyX and lyx2ly

Re: Re: [patch] support CJK font argument

2008-06-10 Thread instanton
-devel,soft_share Sent: 2008-06-10, 16:23:19 Subject: Re: [patch] support CJK font argument instanton wrote: > Nowadays there are a number of document classes supporting Chinese in > LaTeX. Besides using the standard document classes like article, book, > report etc with the aid o

Re: [patch] support CJK font argument

2008-06-06 Thread instanton
> First, I am sorry if my sentence above seemed a bit definitive to you. > It was intended as a joke, and a way to concede Juergen's point about > the need for variation... Never mind. I just need to explain my stand point. > However, I am not sure of one thing: do these different classe

Re: [patch] support CJK font argument

2008-06-06 Thread instanton
> We also want to support users who want to cite CJK > content in non-CJK documents (linguists come to mind). In that case, I would suggest to implement adding \RequirePackage{CJK} \AtBeginDocument{\begin{CJK*}{GBK}{}\CJKtilde\CJKcaption{GB}} \AtEndDocument{\end{CJK*}} in the preamble, rat

Re: [patch] support CJK font argument

2008-06-06 Thread instanton
JMark, > Who are you to decide that they appreciate variation? Let them choose > whether they do! As I am Chinese and also am the maintainer of a special MiKTeX bundle called MiCTeX for Chinese users (which takes special care of all relevant packages which LyX might need to run), I might

inclusion of ghostscript and imagemagic in 1.5.5

2008-05-15 Thread instanton
In LyX-1.5.5-1-Installer.exe both ghostscript and imagemagic are included and there isn't an option for users to decide whether to install these components or use the ghostscript and imagemagic already installed on the system. Given that most LyX-1.5.5 users are already LaTeX users or have alrea