Re: Anyone intested in such a feature?

2006-04-11 Thread Drop Box
Unfortunately what you describe doesn't work. LyX still parses whatever you C-M, and this is precisely why we need something like a \rawtex box. For example, suppose we want TeX code that says "x^-{y}". (You must be able to write stuff like this if you want to use xy-pic for commutative diag

Re: Anyone intested in such a feature?

2006-04-11 Thread Drop Box
I agree that rendering ERT obsolete is a worthy goal. However, there have been several instances in which I was unable to do something within LyX due to poor math ERT support. Personally, I greatly prefer typing LyX math instead of raw LaTeX, but I think lots of people are turned off by LyX's

Re: Mathfrak fonts broken in Windows version

2006-01-05 Thread Drop Box
I managed to fix it myself after a little detective work... I grepped the source code for cmsy10, which provides mathcal, and found qfont_loader.C. In here, one sees that the missing font is called eufm10: { LyXFont::MSB_FAMILY, "msbm10", "-*-msbm10-*-*-*

Math mode ERT problems

2005-12-10 Thread Drop Box
Hello, I'm unsure whether this qualifies as a bug report or a feature request. I've found that it's (almost) impossible for me to achieve certain desirable LaTeX character sequences from within math mode. See my previous post at: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg43675.ht