On 07/31/2017 02:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I do not think so. Maybe after 2.3.0, it will be up to Richard, since the
> amount of code is small.
I guess we will need to see, as usual, if there's a need for fast
release of 2.3.1. But, if not, then we can think about merging early so
it g
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I did not hear your reaction to it either.
I see you just did that, sorry... P
Hi,
Regarding safe behaviour or not, I happened to remember an aspect related
to MS Word and macros.
Some years ago Microsoft changed the old DOC format and as default
introduced the DOCX format. One change was of course the use of XML, but
another is that DOCX does _not_ allow macros --- at all.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I do not think so. Maybe after 2.3.0
:(
> But I suspect that there are dark corners that we have not visited yet.
What is your strategy with features/properpaint? To continue piling up new
patches on top of if or leave it for testing?
Pavel
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Please note that I'm _not_ wholly against something like needauth, I'm simply
> not convinced it's good enough. In fact, I'm still unclear on exactly how it
> currently works, or perhaps rather, how it's intended to work in LyX 2.3.
I already wrote you possible ways
I do not think so. Maybe after 2.3.0, it will be up to Richard, since the
amount of code is small.
Thanks for testing. I am happy that it works. But I suspect that there are dark
corners that we have not visited yet.
JMarc
Le 31 juillet 2017 19:45:09 GMT+02:00, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>
>Whoaa!
Hi Scott,
On 31 July 2017 at 16:50, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I'm concerned that since this issue has left us all exhausted, there is
> > a feeling of "let's just get this over so we can move on". I encourage
> > all of us to give one more cognitive spurt and give a vote.
>
On 31 July 2017 at 20:44, Guillaume MM wrote:
> Le 31/07/2017 à 13:31, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
>
>> I meant it in this sense. If a vote only means "I did not have a
>> look at
>>
>> the patch but I am fed-up so let us go ahead" then it is not taking
>> responsibilitie
On 27 July 2017 at 00:06, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> commit 8a4fcd3d95ca4aeed1c46152cecadf29ed21e774
> + _("SECURITY WARNING!"), _("Unchecking this option has the
> effect that potentially harmful converters would be run without asking your
> permission first. This is UNSAFE and NOT
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:07:11PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote:
>
> I am sure that Scott meant to include in some way the option that I have
> been advocating constantly from the beginning, which I understand is
> probably 1. (Otherwise, I do not see what the option 1. refers to nor
> who proposed i
Per stats on https://www.lyx.org/I18n-trunk it might be proper time to drop
support for languages having less %50 than translation status.
Those would be the winners: Russian, Danish, Greek, Serbian,
Galician, Catalan, Romanian, Dutch.
Any resistance?
Pavel
diff --git a/po/LINGUAS b/po/LINGUAS
i
On 31 July 2017 at 19:52, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > It is not a demo. Only if you want to have all features like e.g.
> > > splitting PDF pages one has to buy another version. So it is the same
> as
> > > with Acrobat Reader, for the full feature set of Acrobat one has to
> p
This looks weird.
As far as I could see, reading preferences is done via
LyXRC::read(FileName const & filename, bool check_format)
which return true if everything is OK.
But if using '\input "some file"', we land at src/LyXRC.cpp:464
Changing as attached, cures it for me.
Kornel
Le 31/07/2017 à 13:00, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:01:39PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:57:01AM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote:
A key point to me is that, according to your other message, going with
3. locks 2.3 into implementing Pygments us
Le 31/07/2017 à 13:31, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
I meant it in this sense. If a vote only means "I did not have a
look at
the patch but I am fed-up so let us go ahead" then it is not taking
responsibilities.
A vote is a vote. If the given voting will be Rates differe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> There's one certainty, regardless of the OS: no matter which order you
>> specify, /someone/ is going to complain. ;-)
>
> Yes. So to avoid a discussion about it I have undone the sort order change
> in the attached updated patch.
Actually you did not. 'masterpdfeditor4' is n
Kornel Benko wrote:
> > It is not a demo. Only if you want to have all features like e.g.
> > splitting PDF pages one has to buy another version. So it is the same as
> > with Acrobat Reader, for the full feature set of Acrobat one has to pay.
>
> Do we really try to promote commercial programs?
On 30 July 2017 at 23:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >Under Linux I was looking for a PDF program with which I can properly
> >fill out and submit PDF forms. I found the Program Master PDF editor
> >and
> >would therefore like to support it in LyX.
>
> To be frank I never heard of it before to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 25/07/2017 ?? 11:37, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>>> Preliminary testing shows that the performance of pressing cursor down
>>> repeatedly is the same, but the performance of Page Down is much better.
>> Is this supposed to change only perf of going down or it also affect
Le 31/07/2017 à 18:09, Kornel Benko a écrit :
I don't understand, I can load bin/lyx2.3 all right now.
So everything works again?
Seems to work, I've recompiled from scratch after editing the options,
I'll keep you posted.
--
Jean-Pierre
Am Montag, 31. Juli 2017 um 17:55:01, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> Le 31/07/2017 à 17:28, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > Am Montag, 31. Juli 2017 um 15:08:36, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> >
> >> Hello Kornel
> >>
> >> After:
> >>
> >> $ cd ../buildmastercmake/
> >> $ rm -rf *
> >> $ cmake -DLY
Le 31/07/2017 à 17:28, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Am Montag, 31. Juli 2017 um 15:08:36, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Hello Kornel
After:
$ cd ../buildmastercmake/
$ rm -rf *
$ cmake -DLYX_ENABLE_EXPORT_TESTS=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=ONb -DLYX_PROGRAM_SUFFIX=ON
-DLYX_ENABLE_CXX11=AUTO -DLYX_USE_QT=QT5 -
Am Montag, 31. Juli 2017 um 15:08:36, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> Hello Kornel
>
> After:
>
> $ cd ../buildmastercmake/
> $ rm -rf *
> $ cmake -DLYX_ENABLE_EXPORT_TESTS=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=ONb
> -DLYX_PROGRAM_SUFFIX=ON
> -DLYX_ENABLE_CXX11=AUTO -DLYX_USE_QT=QT5 -DLYX_INSTALL_PREFIX="git-" ..
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I'm concerned that since this issue has left us all exhausted, there is
> a feeling of "let's just get this over so we can move on". I encourage
> all of us to give one more cognitive spurt and give a vote.
>
> From what I understand, the three options are still what I pro
Hello Kornel
After:
$ cd ../buildmastercmake/
$ rm -rf *
$ cmake -DLYX_ENABLE_EXPORT_TESTS=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=ONb -DLYX_PROGRAM_SUFFIX=ON
-DLYX_ENABLE_CXX11=AUTO -DLYX_USE_QT=QT5 -DLYX_INSTALL_PREFIX="git-" ../master
$ make
$ bin/lyx2.3
I get this:
support/Messages.cpp (247): No language giv
Am Montag, 31. Juli 2017 um 12:51:15, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 02:27:02PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > Testing the patch shell-escape-auth-5.diff, there is 1 issue from my side:
> > The session entry is totally ignored if using 'lyx -E', therefore I'd prefer
> > t
I meant it in this sense. If a vote only means "I did not have a look at
>
the patch but I am fed-up so let us go ahead" then it is not taking
responsibilities.
A vote is a vote. If the given voting will be Rates differently, this will
be have been the last voting I have participated on this list
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:01:39PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:57:01AM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote:
>
> > A key point to me is that, according to your other message, going with
> > 3. locks 2.3 into implementing Pygments using minted. For this reason
> > and that it
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 02:27:02PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> Testing the patch shell-escape-auth-5.diff, there is 1 issue from my side:
> The session entry is totally ignored if using 'lyx -E', therefore I'd prefer
> to save the entries in some other file (for instance "session.shellEscape"),
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:57:01AM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote:
> A key point to me is that, according to your other message, going with
> 3. locks 2.3 into implementing Pygments using minted. For this reason
> and that it does not solve fundamental issues, there are more reasonable
> solutions than
Le 31/07/2017 à 10:57, Guillaume MM a écrit :
I spotted various areas of improvement:
...
* The new buffer param and the boolean argument in the session file are
superfluous and make the code much more complicated than needed.
...
I now understand better that this is by design, but it (still
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 11:01:18PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 07:51:08PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > If I remove the python-pygments module (and reconfigure) and test, I get
> > the following error:
> >
> > The driver command necessary to use the mint
Le 29/07/2017 à 23:57, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 03:30:14PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
On 07/20/2017 01:21 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 19.07.2017, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
The attached patch takes into account all of these ideas. As a
di
Le 27/07/2017 à 00:06, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
commit 8a4fcd3d95ca4aeed1c46152cecadf29ed21e774
Author: Tommaso Cucinotta
Date: Thu Jul 27 00:01:51 2017 +0200
prefs/needauth: added warning if user tries to disable authorization for
needauth converters.
---
+ _("SECURITY
Le 29/07/2017 à 23:54, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 04:09:56PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote:
* Having to use -shell-escape for running Pygments.
Yes, and if we go the way of the patch, I don't think any other
improvements (e.g. post-beta1) will be made to address this, until
35 matches
Mail list logo
