Kornel Benko wrote: > > It is not a demo. Only if you want to have all features like e.g. > > splitting PDF pages one has to buy another version. So it is the same as > > with Acrobat Reader, for the full feature set of Acrobat one has to pay. > > Do we really try to promote commercial programs?
There is free version, with slightly less features, but otherwise if we support acrobat reader which is not open source either why we could not support another closed source but free app? Pavel PS: Out of curiosity I tried it now and was fairly surprised, how _good_ this editor is. It's not the first attempt for pdf editor on Linux, but it's a first one which seems to work just perfectly under my 10 min testing.
