On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:33:03PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:42:10PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The
> > > > slightly weird thing would be that t
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:56:04AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 07/03/2017 à 10:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> > Le 07/03/2017 à 09:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > I get the following output:
> >
> > Indeed the disk is full (50G). It turns out that trac.log is now 10G
> > (sin
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 10:10:58PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> I am not sure to understand since I am not familiar with this part of LyX.
> But I will push a patch that makes "buffer-export *" synonymous to
> buffer-export so that your patch becomes simpler.
Thanks, that does make things more
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:42:10PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The
> > > slightly weird thing would be that the release manager would be in
> > > charge of the 2.3.x branch until 2
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:42:10PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The
> > slightly weird thing would be that the release manager would be in
> > charge of the 2.3.x branch until 2.3.0 and then the stable branch
>
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:03:13AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 07/03/2017 à 01:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The
> > slightly weird thing would be that the release manager would be in
> > charge of the 2.3.x branch until
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:23:13AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 00.06.24 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [...]
>
> Thank you Scott for all distilling your experience as release manager, as
> this
> is important to improve the development process. :-)
>
> I will left t
It looks as if we have once again for some reason lost the entire
trac.htpasswd file. I noticed this because trac refused to accept my
password. I was able to reset it but then remembered what had happened
before. This may have been due to the disk's being full. In any event,
I've restored the file
On 03/06/2017 07:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 09:53:08PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>> If you create a 2.4 milestone then I can already re-target the bugs that
>> I care about so as to have a better picture of 2.3.
> +1
I've created 2.4.0 and 2.4.x milestones.
Richar
Le 07/03/17 à 21:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
It is not necessary to resize the screen, just get to section 2.1.1 of
the Tutorial. Scrolling or searching for "Typing, Viewing" will do it.
I can't reproduce this, though I am not using Qt5, so perhaps that is
part of the issue.
FWIW, I can reprod
On 03/04/2017 03:53 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 24/02/2017 à 18:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>> Hi there,
>>
>> A good subject before the week-end: what do we need to do before
>> declaring feature freeze for 2.3? Personally I have finished a cycle or
>> breaking/fixing the math editor an
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The
> slightly weird thing would be that the release manager would be in
> charge of the 2.3.x branch until 2.3.0 and then the stable branch
2.3.x is good for devs and less good for 2.3 because it gets less att
On 03/07/2017 05:40 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
> I compiled & installed lyx 2.2.3, in order to check some things in the
> tutorial.
>
> git pull
>
> ./autogen.sh
>
> ./configure --enable-qt5 --with-gnu-ld --with-version-suffix=test
> CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=native"
>
> make -j
On 03/07/2017 06:16 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 07/03/2017 à 12:08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>> commit dc126bad0441eb8721043e597657d5c18bdf6c90
>> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>> Date: Tue Mar 7 12:02:54 2017 +0100
>>
>> Fix typo found by coverity
>>
>> We were not testing
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:06:12AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Monday, 6 March 2017 22.27.25 WET Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > The problem is that the file starts with a U+FEFF BOM mark, and most
> > probably lyx2lyx doesn't expect to deal with BOM marks. Actually, the
> > conversion succee
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/92/
Le 07/03/2017 à 12:08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
commit dc126bad0441eb8721043e597657d5c18bdf6c90
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Date: Tue Mar 7 12:02:54 2017 +0100
Fix typo found by coverity
We were not testing for the right end(), although it is not sure that
an actual bug co
The attached patch fixes the regression introduced in 2.2 about the
output of en- and em-dashes. In 2.2 en- and em-dashes are output as
the \textendash and \textemdash macros, causing changed output in
old documents and also bugs (for example, #10490).
With this patch, documents produced with olde
I compiled & installed lyx 2.2.3, in order to check some things in the
tutorial.
git pull
./autogen.sh
./configure --enable-qt5 --with-gnu-ld --with-version-suffix=test
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=native"
make -j 5
#make install
I started up LyX, english version: lan
Le 07/03/2017 à 10:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
OK, the file is gone now. A big part of the remaining space taken is 18G
in tracdumps, which holds... backups of our gigantic trac log file :) I
did not touch it for now, since this disk space will naturally be
reclaimed as old backups get del
Le 27/02/2017 à 08:56, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
Hi,
This is a CI job I'm working on that's intended to run automated tests:
Hi Christian,
The next natural step could be to use your CI stuff to update our
coverity builds:
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/4164
Currently the build ar
Le 07/03/2017 à 04:01, ci-...@inria.fr a écrit :
Makefile:773: recipe for target 'dist' failed
Command 'make distcheck' failed, exiting
make[3]: *** No rule to make target '1.2.5/myspell.hxx', needed by 'distdir'.
Stop.
make[2]: *** [distdir] Error 1
make[1]: *** [distdir] Error 1
make: *** [di
Le 07/03/2017 à 01:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The
slightly weird thing would be that the release manager would be in
charge of the 2.3.x branch until 2.3.0 and then the stable branch
maintainer would be in charge of the branch afte
Le 07/03/2017 à 10:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 07/03/2017 à 09:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I get the following output:
Indeed the disk is full (50G). It turns out that trac.log is now 10G
(since 2013!).
I am currently downloading it, just in case, and will then delete it.
OK, the
Le 07/03/2017 à 09:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I get the following output:
Indeed the disk is full (50G). It turns out that trac.log is now 10G
(since 2013!).
I am currently downloading it, just in case, and will then delete it.
JMarc
On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 00.06.24 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote:
[...]
Thank you Scott for all distilling your experience as release manager, as this
is important to improve the development process. :-)
I will left the other issues that you have raised for others.
> In case someone is craving wants
I get the following output:
$ git push -n
To g...@git.lyx.org:lyx
15babdc..cd87bd7 master -> master
$ git push
Counting objects: 8, done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (8/8), done.
Writing objects: 100% (8/8), 1012 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done.
Total 8 (delta 6)
27 matches
Mail list logo
