Scott Kostyshak wrote: > When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The > slightly weird thing would be that the release manager would be in > charge of the 2.3.x branch until 2.3.0 and then the stable branch
2.3.x is good for devs and less good for 2.3 because it gets less attention. OTOH if the manager is sloppy with deadlines people get very frustrated about the freeze and that is not good either. Anyway I think that the manager should have major word in decisions like this because he will have the burden/responsibility for whatever decision is taken. So let's get to the point: Are you willing to be release manager for 2.3? Pavel
