Re: LyX 2.2 slowness

2017-01-09 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 10.01.2017 um 00:24 schrieb Stephan Witt : > > Am 08.01.2017 um 19:09 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : >> >> Le 08/01/2017 à 18:59, Stephan Witt a écrit : >>> Ok, I don’t see this with current 2.2.x. AFAIK, you did the backport and >>> applied it there too. >>> The patch seems to be innocent :)

Re: LyX 2.2 slowness

2017-01-09 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 08.01.2017 um 19:09 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > Le 08/01/2017 à 18:59, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> Ok, I don’t see this with current 2.2.x. AFAIK, you did the backport and >> applied it there too. >> The patch seems to be innocent :) > > A bisect would be appreciated :) Note that I have

Re: doc/UserGuide systemF tests failing

2017-01-09 Thread Günter Milde
On 9.01.17, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 09:12 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > > > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 sch

Re: doc/UserGuide systemF tests failing

2017-01-09 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Montag, 9. Januar 2017 um 17:07:01, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Montag, 9. Januar 2017 um 10:55:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:50:55PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > I'd prefer to make the behaviour be document specific. Ignoring errors in > > > tests > > >

Re: pasted non-acceptable symbol

2017-01-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 05/12/2016 à 09:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 10/11/2016 à 10:19, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : So shall I apply it? Yes, please. Done in master at 6dfbab31. Richard, this is candidate for branch too, since it leads to crashes. Ping :) Richard, is this OK for branch? Ping Pin

Re: doc/UserGuide systemF tests failing

2017-01-09 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Montag, 9. Januar 2017 um 10:55:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:50:55PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > I'd prefer to make the behaviour be document specific. Ignoring errors in > > tests > > does not feel right if used in general. > > Sounds good to me. Seems like

Re: doc/UserGuide systemF tests failing

2017-01-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:50:55PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > I'd prefer to make the behaviour be document specific. Ignoring errors in > tests > does not feel right if used in general. Sounds good to me. Seems like you and Jürgen agree on this. Kornel, would it be difficult to incorporate thi

Re: doc/UserGuide systemF tests failing

2017-01-09 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Montag, 9. Januar 2017 um 10:15:56, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 09:12 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > > > Am Sonntag, de

Re: doc/UserGuide systemF tests failing

2017-01-09 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 10:15 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > Let's first ask Kornel and Günter. Do you think we should turn this > option on by default for the tests? I don't know too much about this, > but it makes sense to me because it will help make the tests less > sensitive to font choic

Re: doc/UserGuide systemF tests failing

2017-01-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 09:12 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > > Ignoring the

Re: Biblatex

2017-01-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 01/09/2017 04:40 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 09/01/2017 à 10:22, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : >> Having said that, I agree that LyX 2.3 could be released rather soon >> after this has settled. We also already have some other nice new >> features and substantial code refactoring (esp. dr

Re: Biblatex

2017-01-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 01/08/2017 10:03 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 9/01/2017 7:50 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: >> >> Thanks so much for doing this. I've not yet moved to biblatex myself, >> but this will encourage me to give it a try. >> >> Richard >> >> >> On 01/08/2017 04:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >>> Biblat

Re: doc/UserGuide systemF tests failing

2017-01-09 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 09:12 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > Ignoring the > > > > missing glyphs warning strikes me a better alternative. > > >  > >

tex2lyx tests are failing on master

2017-01-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
tex2lyx tests are failing on recent master. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: doc/UserGuide systemF tests failing

2017-01-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > Ignoring the > > > missing glyphs warning strikes me a better alternative. > > > > Perhaps. Does anyone volunteer to do this work? > > Please try the attach

Re: doc/UserGuide systemF tests failing

2017-01-09 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > Ignoring the > > missing glyphs warning strikes me a better alternative. > > Perhaps. Does anyone volunteer to do this work? Please try the attached patch. The lyx option  --ignore-error-message missing_glyphs does what you need

Re: Biblatex

2017-01-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 09/01/2017 à 10:22, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Having said that, I agree that LyX 2.3 could be released rather soon after this has settled. We also already have some other nice new features and substantial code refactoring (esp. drawing improvements). But it's not my call. I would second

Re: Biblatex

2017-01-09 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 16:03 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: > Given the age of this enhancement request and the number of people > over  > the years who have enquired about biblatex support in LyX, I wonder > if  > any thought has been given to its release? It feels more like the  > centrepiece