On 20/04/16 17:21, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:32:20AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to compile rc1 with limited success.
Compilation occurs, but when tested, on existing 2.1 files and on a
new file (using src/lyx) it is not possible to insert or e
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:32:20AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to compile rc1 with limited success.
Compilation occurs, but when tested, on existing 2.1 files and on a new file
(using src/lyx) it is not possible to insert or edit citations. Everything else
appears to work
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:19:51PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
>
> On 20/04/16 14:32, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:21:02AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>From: Scott Kostyshak
> >>
> >>> Yes, this is all great information. Thank you for investigating.
On 20/04/16 14:32, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:21:02AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
>>
>>
>>From: Scott Kostyshak
>>
>>> Yes, this is all great information. Thank you for investigating. It
>>> would be useful to figure out why 2.1.4 works for you and 2.2.0rc1
doe
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:21:02AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
>
>
> From: Scott Kostyshak
>
> >Yes, this is all great information. Thank you for investigating. It
> >would be useful to figure out why 2.1.4 works for you and 2.2.0rc1 does>not.
> >Can you run the command "ldd" on the comp
From: Scott Kostyshak
To: Bruce Muirhead
Cc: LyX Developers
Sent: Wednesday, 20 April 2016, 13:20
Subject: Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 insert-citation problems
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:56:08AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
>
>
> From: Scott Kostyshak
> To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:56:08AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
>
>
> From: Scott Kostyshak
> To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 April 2016, 12:10
> Subject: Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 insert-citation problems
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:32:20AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:32:20AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been trying to compile rc1 with limited success.
>
> Compilation occurs, but when tested, on existing 2.1 files and on a new file
> (using src/lyx) it is not possible to insert or edit citations. Everything
> else appe
Hi,
I've been trying to compile rc1 with limited success.
Compilation occurs, but when tested, on existing 2.1 files and on a new file
(using src/lyx) it is not possible to insert or edit citations. Everything else
appears to work efficiently and effectively.
I suspect a configuration problem c
On 04/19/2016 05:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:19:15PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 17:01:58, schrieb Richard Heck
>>
>>>
>>> Note that nothing goes to 2.2.x-staging that is not in 2.3-staging. This
>>> is the same as usual procedure: C
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:37:23PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:08:50PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> >
> >> PS: Since RC is "Release candidate" we should IMHO only allow really
> >> critical bug fixes between RC1 and 2.2.0 final. In particular I
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:58:42AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 15/04/2016 21:56, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 09:48:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Le 15/04/16 21:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:19:20PM +0200, Jean-
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:19:15PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 17:01:58, schrieb Richard Heck
> > On 04/19/2016 04:58 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 15:09:40, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> > >
> > >> Le 19/04/2016 14:05, Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 17:01:58, schrieb Richard Heck
> On 04/19/2016 04:58 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 15:09:40, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >
> >> Le 19/04/2016 14:05, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >>> Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 12:04:19, schrieb Jean-M
On 04/19/2016 04:58 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 15:09:40, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
>> Le 19/04/2016 14:05, Kornel Benko a écrit :
>>> Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 12:04:19, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>
commit 6a1803e18dfac1720920a4fc8c500300658bc7d7
Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 21:05:57, schrieb Georg Baum
> Richard Heck wrote:
>
> > The other two 2.2.x-staging branches are entirely for book-keeping
> > purposes. It is just easier for me to have the various fixes that are
> > intended for 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 in git branches rather than to try
Since there seems still to be some confusion about this, let me just try
to put it
all down in the simplest form I can:
1. Anything that would ordinary have gone to master should go to
2.3-staging.
2. The rules for 2.1.x are as normal.
3. Anything that goes to 2.3-staging is also eligible, in pri
On 04/19/2016 03:05 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> The other two 2.2.x-staging branches are entirely for book-keeping
>> purposes. It is just easier for me to have the various fixes that are
>> intended for 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 in git branches rather than to try to keep
>> track of the
Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 15:09:40, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 19/04/2016 14:05, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 12:04:19, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >
> >> commit 6a1803e18dfac1720920a4fc8c500300658bc7d7
> >> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >> Date:
Richard Heck wrote:
> The other two 2.2.x-staging branches are entirely for book-keeping
> purposes. It is just easier for me to have the various fixes that are
> intended for 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 in git branches rather than to try to keep
> track of them via milestones or keywords or whatever in trac.
Hmm, lots of things here. I will not have time to reply correctly right
now but I will just say two things:
1/ please keep the conversation on the lyx-devel list, it is important
that everybody can chime in
2/ Stephan, do you think that you can give direction for using the
profiler when perf
On 04/19/2016 04:49 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:07:01PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>>> We should already be on 2.2 and not on master, which is the future: 2.3
>>>
>> Yes, that was also my proposal.
>>
>> However, people appear to be afraid to not have the 2.2.0
Le 19/04/2016 14:05, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 12:04:19, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
commit 6a1803e18dfac1720920a4fc8c500300658bc7d7
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Date: Wed Feb 3 10:37:29 2016 +0100
Fix display of InsetCollapsable with split views
May I a
Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 12:04:19, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> commit 6a1803e18dfac1720920a4fc8c500300658bc7d7
> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Date: Wed Feb 3 10:37:29 2016 +0100
>
> Fix display of InsetCollapsable with split views
May I ask why this (and other) commit goes to
Le 18/04/2016 22:35, Richard Heck a écrit :
Factor the code that triggers row/column selection and fix the
logic. Now it is possible to select also at the right of the tabular
inset.
This is candidate for 2.2.2 (it relies on the first patch of ticket
#9756).
OK.
Done now.
JMarc
Le 19/04/2016 01:26, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
This turns InsetMathHull::isTable() into a redefinition of
Inset::isTable().
OK, I missed the definition of InsetMathHull::isTable() at that time.
As I see it, your version of isTable means 'does it handle tabular
features?'
Mine is more like:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:07:01PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >
> > We should already be on 2.2 and not on master, which is the future: 2.3
> >
>
> Yes, that was also my proposal.
>
> However, people appear to be afraid to not have the 2.2.0 tag in master.
Yes, I was the scared one.
27 matches
Mail list logo
