Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 17:01:58, schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> > On 04/19/2016 04:58 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 15:09:40, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > <lasgout...@lyx.org> > >> Le 19/04/2016 14:05, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >>> Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 12:04:19, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > >>> <lasgout...@lyx.org> > >>>> commit 6a1803e18dfac1720920a4fc8c500300658bc7d7 > >>>> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> > >>>> Date: Wed Feb 3 10:37:29 2016 +0100 > >>>> > >>>> Fix display of InsetCollapsable with split views > >>> May I ask why this (and other) commit goes to 2.2.2-staging? When will it > >>> make into 2.3-staging? > >>> I thought, that new things go first to later versions and will eventually > >>> be backported. > >> I put it there yesterday at b31a9937d. > >> > >> JMarc > > It is too easy to lose track ATM. Something like 'backported from' or > > 'cherry picked from' in the commit message would be helpful. At least for > > me. > > Note that nothing goes to 2.2.x-staging that is not in 2.3-staging. This > is the same as usual procedure: Commit to master, then ask if it's ok to > commit to 2.1.x. It's just that 2.3-staging is playing the role of > master now and 2.2.x-staging is playing the role of 2.1.x.
I understood it from your other mail. BUT if 2.3-staging is playing the role
of master, why not use master
and get rid of this 2.3-staging? What is the role of master now? Being closed
(which it is not because there are
commits! E.g. c46d5cc) is not very satisfying.
> Richard
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
