On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:58:42AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 15/04/2016 21:56, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 09:48:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Le 15/04/16 21:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:19:20PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > > Le 13/04/2016 21:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > > > > > > It is indeed in SOURCEFILES, and it had been there all the time. I > > > > > > guess > > > > > > it should be removed, but with care. > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you build before doing "make dist"? > > > > > > > > > > I'd say that this patch is all we need. > > > > > > > > If "I'd say" means you are confident, then go ahead. Let me know if you > > > > want me to test something (e.g. apply your patch and make the tar file > > > > and check). > > > > > > I am confident, but then the makefile was like that from the start in > > > 2007, > > > so that makes me more nervous. But then, what could possibly go wrong? ;) > > > > Normally I probably wouldn't want to change something at this point, but > > on 2.2.0rc1 that file takes up 24MB in the extracted tar ball so it > > would be nice to get rid of it. > > Is this a +1 for 2.2.0?
Yes. Since you are confident, I think decreasing the tar ball by 20% is significant. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
