The implementation of separators in this version is a little different and
confusing. Frame separators that show up as lines in 2.1 appear as an
unfamiliar character, but not as a separator in the paragraph style. In
fact, separators don't appear with the rest of the styles on the left, and
it seem
Am 09.03.2016 um 04:37 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
8. What am I missing?
- I need for Qt 5.6 this patch from Peter to be applied:
https://github.com/syntheticpp/lyx/commit/2470fb442cb2b04a69b2030f28f1da60221556a7?diff=unified
- bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10009
- we still haven't done an
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I think we are getting close to being able to release 2.2.0rc1. We have
> not discussed whether to release a beta3 or move directly to rc1. If
> others disagree with moving directly to rc1, please do speak up and
> let's discuss.
rc1 is fine.
> Below are t
Actually the concept was :
1. Take a quick look at the relevant makefile
2. If it looks difficult to fix then
2.1 pretend you don't have time for pointless stuff
Else
2.2 fix the bug and brag about it.
I will apply ASAP.
Jmarc
Le 9 mars 2016 20:06:30 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On 2016-03-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 09:36:43PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> After all, this is a know upstream bug, not a "real" LyX issue (although LyX
>> may add a workaround as suggested in #8035).
> Do yo
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:55:33AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 09/03/2016 09:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> >AFAICS what you do does not test that the distributed LyX works with
> >monolithic builds, but that the "make dist" machinery still works when
> >configuring with monolithi
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:23:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2016-03-08 5:11 GMT+01:00 Scott Kostyshak :
>
> > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 01:42:15PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > When using beamer article I get an error if I try to add the color
> > > purple to some text:
> > >
> > > \
On Wednesday, March 09, 2016 01:51:26 PM Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Moving to rc1 is OK.
+1
--
José Abílio
On Friday, February 26, 2016 02:45:08 PM Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 26/02/2016 05:07, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >> We don't have a patch.
> >
> > Nevermind. A patch was proposed here:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=56B365D0.4040203%40free.fr
>
> So someone has to update i
Am 09.03.2016 um 04:37 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> Dear all,
>
> I think we are getting close to being able to release 2.2.0rc1. We have
> not discussed whether to release a beta3 or move directly to rc1. If
> others disagree with moving directly to rc1, please do speak up and
> let's discuss.
Le 09/03/2016 04:37, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Dear all,
I think we are getting close to being able to release 2.2.0rc1. We have
not discussed whether to release a beta3 or move directly to rc1. If
others disagree with moving directly to rc1, please do speak up and
let's discuss.
Moving to rc1
> Am 09.03.2016 um 13:00 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>
> Am 09.03.2016 um 11:37 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>>
>> Le 09/03/2016 11:30, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>
Personally, I did not know this -e option, and it is not very standard IMO.
I do not know what is a standard way to add a line
Am 09.03.2016 um 11:37 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> Le 09/03/2016 11:30, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> If this is a bug I cannot decide - indeed this is a little bit weird:
>>
>> $ echo -e x
>> x
>> $ which echo
>> /bin/echo
>> $ type echo
>> echo is a shell builtin
>> $ sh
>> sh-3.2$ type echo
2016-03-08 5:11 GMT+01:00 Scott Kostyshak :
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 01:42:15PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > When using beamer article I get an error if I try to add the color
> > purple to some text:
> >
> > \fi
> >
> > The package xcolor has already been loaded with options:
> > []
> > T
Le 09/03/2016 11:30, Stephan Witt a écrit :
If this is a bug I cannot decide - indeed this is a little bit weird:
$ echo -e x
x
$ which echo
/bin/echo
$ type echo
echo is a shell builtin
$ sh
sh-3.2$ type echo
echo is a shell builtin
sh-3.2$ echo -e x
-e x
sh-3.2$
And "help echo"?
Personally
Am 09.03.2016 um 11:03 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> Le 08/03/2016 22:49, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> 1. What’s the point of using --enable-monolithic-build=yes ?
>>
>> I cannot compile LyX with it on Mac.
>>
>>
>> CXX liblyxqt4.o
>> liblyxqt4.cpp:1:1: erro
Le 08/03/2016 22:49, Stephan Witt a écrit :
1. What’s the point of using --enable-monolithic-build=yes ?
I cannot compile LyX with it on Mac.
CXX liblyxqt4.o
liblyxqt4.cpp:1:1: error: expected external declaration
-e
^
liblyxqt4.cpp:1:2: error: unknown type
Le 09/03/2016 09:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
AFAICS what you do does not test that the distributed LyX works with
monolithic builds, but that the "make dist" machinery still works when
configuring with monolithic builds. I tend to think that it is pointless.
But since I am fundamentally
Le 08/03/2016 23:47, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
1. What’s the point of using --enable-monolithic-build=yes ?
See Pavel's response for what you were probably most interested in. My
response is simply that as the release manager I want to test as many
options as possible.
AFAICS what you do does
19 matches
Mail list logo
