Am Donnerstag, den 03.12.2015, 02:23 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Lange:
> log.idx is not very informative (No error report). So implementing
> this is
> not useful.
It can be implemented with some effort, see
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2569
Jürgen
>
> Regards
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:44:12AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:13:02PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> > Sorry for opening a new thread, but gmane did already expire the old thread
> > in the nntp interface, and I do not keep lyx-devel mails.
> >
> > The attached p
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:13:02PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Sorry for opening a new thread, but gmane did already expire the old thread
> in the nntp interface, and I do not keep lyx-devel mails.
>
> The attached patch implements the third option I described in the starting
> message of the o
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 05:32:17PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 05:29 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 06:57:23PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >> I also have another bug to report (very subtle and better seen in
> >> combination with the view source panel).
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 05:31:37PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 05:24 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 12:34:47AM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >> Le 11/12/2015 22:47, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 06:52:19PM +, Guillaume Munc
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 11:58:16AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.01.2016 um 01:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> >S1. Would it be reasonable to build beta1 installers with both Qt 5.5.1
> >and 5.6.0beta1?
>
> There will be no downloadable msvc2010 builds for 5.6. ATM only 5.5.1:
>
> http:
On 01/09/2016 05:29 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 06:57:23PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>> I also have another bug to report (very subtle and better seen in
>> combination with the view source panel). There seems to be two cursor
>> positions before and after the separat
On 01/09/2016 05:24 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 12:34:47AM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>> Le 11/12/2015 22:47, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 06:52:19PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> [...]
• Defect: They tend to accumulate and they are re
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 06:57:23PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>
> I also have another bug to report (very subtle and better seen in
> combination with the view source panel). There seems to be two cursor
> positions before and after the separator, both being displayed before
> the separator. On
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 12:34:47AM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 11/12/2015 22:47, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 06:52:19PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
[...]
> >>• Defect: They tend to accumulate and they are redundant because there
> >> is only one additional '\n'
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 09:23:43PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-01-09, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 17:51:06, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >
> >> On 2016-01-08, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> ...
>
> > for the tests to do the best job they can at testing the use of system
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 11:03:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 03:36:52PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> > On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > >> Georg's patch still needs a final +1:
> > >> http
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 03:36:52PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >> Georg's patch still needs a final +1:
> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org
> >>
>
Since we now require a +1 from another developer before a patch goes in,
I have seen some confusion because some reviewers have written something
like "looks OK" or "I have tested and nothing broke" and the author of
the patch is understandably not sure if what was written was a +1 or
not. If these
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 03:36:52PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >> Georg's patch still needs a final +1:
> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org
> >>
>
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 02:27:46PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 08.01.2016 um 10:26 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> >
> > Le 08/01/2016 10:08, Stephan Witt a écrit :
> >> Am 08.01.2016 um 09:28 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> >>> Yes, unless somone has a different brilliant idea.
> >>
> >> A
On 2016-01-09, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 17:51:06, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
>> On 2016-01-08, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
...
> for the tests to do the best job they can at testing the use of system
>> > fonts.
...
>> However, "the best job they can" (for me) does not imply
On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> Georg's patch still needs a final +1:
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org
>>
>> JMarc did you have any other concerns with it? Does anyone else?
>
> Un
Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Georg's patch still needs a final +1:
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org
JMarc did you have any other concerns with it? Does anyone else?
Unfortunately I do not know much about this origin business. My comm
Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 17:51:06, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2016-01-08, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
>
> > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 08:11:19PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 12:21:44, schrieb Scott Kostysh
On 2016-01-09, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 15:07:32, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
>> On 2016-01-09, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> > After the last commit, this tests fail:
>> >1770 - EXAMPLES_export/examples/linguistics_dvi3_systemF (Failed)
>> >1775 - EXAMPLES_export/example
On 2016-01-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I have gone through this thread and tried to make a summary of the questions
> and discussion for Uwe. Please add more questions if you have any or edit my
> misinterpretation of the question/comment.
> The following letters refer to the person that asked t
On 2016-01-08, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 08:11:19PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 12:21:44, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>>
>> > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 07:09:44AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 15:07:32, schrieb Guenter Milde
> Dear Kornel,
>
> thank you for the quick test report.
>
> On 2016-01-09, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > After the last commit, this tests fail:
> > 1770 - EXAMPLES_export/examples/linguistics_dvi3_systemF (Failed)
> > 1775 - EX
Dear Kornel,
thank you for the quick test report.
On 2016-01-09, Kornel Benko wrote:
> After the last commit, this tests fail:
> 1770 - EXAMPLES_export/examples/linguistics_dvi3_systemF (Failed)
> 1775 - EXAMPLES_export/examples/linguistics_pdf4_systemF (Failed)
> 1777 - EXAMPL
Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 14:27:46, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 08.01.2016 um 10:26 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> >
> > Le 08/01/2016 10:08, Stephan Witt a écrit :
> >> Am 08.01.2016 um 09:28 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> >>> Yes, unless somone has a different brilliant idea.
> >>
> >> A
Am 08.01.2016 um 10:26 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> Le 08/01/2016 10:08, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> Am 08.01.2016 um 09:28 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>>> Yes, unless somone has a different brilliant idea.
>>
>> Am I right that it makes explicit what is otherwise implicit? So it is safe
Am 08.01.2016 um 10:26 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :Le 08/01/2016 10:08, Stephan Witt a écrit :Am 08.01.2016 um 09:28 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :Yes, unless somone has a different brilliant idea.Am I right that it makes explicit what is otherwise implicit? So it is safe to commit?Yes, I think s
Am 09.01.2016 um 13:12 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 08.01.2016 um 13:15 schrieb Kornel Benko :
Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 13:09:38, schrieb Stephan Witt
Am 08.01.2016 um 11:53 schrieb Kornel Benko :
Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 09:10:00, schrieb Stephan Witt
OR (maybe)
include_dire
Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 21:47:21, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2016-01-08, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 06:31:37AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2016-01-08, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > Here is the diff:
>
> > $ diff ctests_d7ff8c6e/LastTestsFailed.log
> > ct
Am 08.01.2016 um 13:15 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 13:09:38, schrieb Stephan Witt
>> Am 08.01.2016 um 11:53 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>>>
>>> Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 09:10:00, schrieb Stephan Witt
>>>
> OR (maybe)
> include_directories((BEFORE
>
Am 09.01.2016 um 01:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 10:58:13AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 08:56:38AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 08:05:17PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I don't understand how instal
32 matches
Mail list logo