Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

2015-10-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 05:57:46PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:21:15PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > I'd prefer you to do this. > > OK I'll work on it. Does the attached patch look good? We need to do something similar for the other FIXMEs you put in 1523fc60, r

Re: Minimum compiler version

2015-10-31 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am 29.10.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Georg Baum: BTW, I wanted to try the cross-compiling myself for several montsh now, because I am curious, but did not find the time up to now. The build-bot already cross-compiles for Windows, it is NOT a Windows machine. Recently travis updated their bots to to

Re: Upgrade to boost 1.59?

2015-10-31 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am 25.10.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:13:03PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I have it documented somewhere. Should I put it in development.lyx ? If you are able to find it easily then I would say yes, please do. Even though Peter already did the upd

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

2015-10-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:21:15PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:45:38PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:12:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> >> On 2015-

lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

2015-10-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
The list of tests at the bottom of this message pass on current master [1] but do not pass on current master after exporting the .lyx files to 2.1.x format. So this is in some sense a compilation test of roundtrip lyx2lyx. Any lyx2lyx experts want to take a look? Scott [1] I am running the tests

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

2015-10-31 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am 14.10.2015 um 21:52 schrieb Georg Baum: David Hyde wrote: I'm interested in looking into this at least a bit (may become deterred if some dependency nightmare occurs!). I've looked at the current MSVC dependencies that are in the archive on sourceforge. Which of these are things that shoul

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

2015-10-31 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:45:38PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:12:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> >> On 2015-10-29, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > OK so it seems we're on the same page. T

Re: [patch] update modernCV layout file

2015-10-31 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2015-10-30, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> Ah makes sense. Regarding for example Ubuntu LTS, how should we state >> such a rule? If LyX has a major release on May 1st 2016 does that mean >> we can depend on the latest versions in Ubuntu 16.04? That does not feel >> correct. So th

Re: [patch] use setProcessEnvironment, not shell escape (cmd / env)

2015-10-31 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:36:24PM -0400, PhilipPirrip wrote: > Thanks for responding, Enrico. I appreciate it! > > > >I am sorry, but it still doesn't work. > >As you can see, now it doesn't work because setProcessEnvironment() is used. > > I don't understand what that script (myprog) is exact

Re: Some inverted tests are now compilable

2015-10-31 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 14:51:51, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 07:28:47PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 14:04:48, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > a good guess is that you have a TeX Live that is more updated than mine. > > > I have

Re: Some inverted tests are now compilable

2015-10-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 07:28:47PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 14:04:48, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > a good guess is that you have a TeX Live that is more updated than mine. > > I have intentionally not updated my TeX Live because I wanted to wait > > until we h

Re: Some inverted tests are now compilable

2015-10-31 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 14:04:48, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 06:05:38PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 01:35:53, schrieb Kornel Benko > > ... > > > > Manually tested, system font was DejaVu: > > PDF-comment_dvi

Re: Some inverted tests are now compilable

2015-10-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 06:05:38PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 01:35:53, schrieb Kornel Benko > > > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 20:02:34, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:52:13AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Today I got thes

Re: Some inverted tests are now compilable

2015-10-31 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 01:35:53, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 20:02:34, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:52:13AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Today I got these tests (as failed, e.g. they should be OK now) > > > > > > 1779:INVERTED_

Re: status update on the export tests

2015-10-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:14:39PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Mittwoch 28 Oktober 2015, 11:31:38 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > It may be that we need a new keyword for lib/languages, to tag > > > languages where Babel is superior to Polyglossia also with non-TeX fonts. > > > > > > Then

Re: lyx2lyx strange STDERR output

2015-10-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:11:54PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag 30 Oktober 2015, 19:52:29 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > $ lyx2lyx -t 474 lib/examples/de/linguistics.lyx > /dev/null > > Warning: content: Dies ist > > Warning: content: This is > > Warning: content: Dies ist > > Warnin

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

2015-10-31 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 31-10-2015 om 14:44 schreef PhilipPirrip: On 10/31/2015 09:27 AM, PhilipPirrip wrote: Thanks, David. It did work with Qt 4.8.6 First thing I noticed, though, is that most icons are missing. Have to investigate. I remember seeing a similar issue here on the list recently. The errors reporte

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

2015-10-31 Thread PhilipPirrip
On 10/31/2015 09:27 AM, PhilipPirrip wrote: Thanks, David. It did work with Qt 4.8.6 First thing I noticed, though, is that most icons are missing. Have to investigate. I remember seeing a similar issue here on the list recently. The errors reported in the message pane are of this kind GuiAppli

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

2015-10-31 Thread PhilipPirrip
Thanks, David. It did work with Qt 4.8.6 First thing I noticed, though, is that most icons are missing. Have to investigate. I remember seeing a similar issue here on the list recently. On 10/31/2015 03:53 AM, David Hyde wrote: I experienced this error as well when setting up my LyX build

Re: status update on the export tests

2015-10-31 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Mittwoch 28 Oktober 2015, 11:31:38 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > It may be that we need a new keyword for lib/languages, to tag > > languages where Babel is superior to Polyglossia also with non-TeX fonts. > > > > Then, the "automatic" setting (which is also the default "default") could > > take

Re: lyx2lyx strange STDERR output

2015-10-31 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag 30 Oktober 2015, 19:52:29 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > $ lyx2lyx -t 474 lib/examples/de/linguistics.lyx > /dev/null > Warning: content: Dies ist > Warning: content: This is > Warning: content: Dies ist > Warning: content: full of > > Is that output expected? It is the same on the terminal

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

2015-10-31 Thread David Hyde
I experienced this error as well when setting up my LyX build environment (Windows 10 + MSVC 2010 + Qt 4.8.6). The only insight I can provide is that initially, my cmake config wasn't an exact match to what was described in INSTALL.Win32. That file was written for Qt < 5, so as part of getting