On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 07:28:47PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 14:04:48, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > <skost...@lyx.org> > > a good guess is that you have a TeX Live that is more updated than mine. > > I have intentionally not updated my TeX Live because I wanted to wait > > until we had 0 test failures and then update TeX Live (holding fixed the > > LyX hash I tested at) to see what changes. I'm not sure if that day will > > come though so perhaps I should update also. > > > > In your commit message with regards to ectaart can you reference commit > > 8a4c9b6 and put that we think the reason these exports started passing > > is because of your updated LuaTeX version? Put what LuaTeX your version > > is as the "good" version and mine as the "bad" version: > > > > Version beta-0.80.0 (TeX Live 2015) (rev 5238) > > Interesting, I have the same version. So it may be some new luainputenc.sty > and/or ectaart.cls. > But luainputenc.sty and ectaart.cls did not change at least from TL2013. > > > Do you think your TeX Live update broken any non-inverted tests? > > I don't think so.
Good. > > This is good news. > > Now I am confused, what else may be the difference between our installations? Probably several other package versions. We can compare our LaTeX logs, but I'm not sure it's worth the time. I think it would be worth the time if an export went from successful to failing. But if you are curious I do not mind at all. In any case, once I update TeX Live (soon), I will be able to confirm that it was a package update. Scott
