Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 14:04:48, schrieb Scott Kostyshak 
<skost...@lyx.org>
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 06:05:38PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 01:35:53, schrieb Kornel Benko 
> > <kor...@lyx.org>
...
> > 
> > Manually tested, system font was DejaVu:
> >     PDF-comment_dvi                         #OK, through export as dvi, 
> > open with xdvi
> >     PDF-comment_pdf                         #OK
> >     PDF-comment_pdf3                        #OK, through dvipdfm
> >     PDF-comment_pdf4_systemF        #OK
> >     aas_sample_pdf4_systemF         #OK
> >     fr/simplecv_pdf4_systemF        #OK
> >     ectaart_dvi3_texF                       #OK, through export as dvi3, 
> > open with xdvi
> >     ectaart_dvi3_systemF            #OK, through export as dvi3, open with 
> > xdvi
> >     ectaart_pdf5_texF                       #OK
> >     ectaart_pdf5_systemF            #OK
> > 
> > I think, the docs are all OK.
> 
> I would say go ahead and invert then. I just checked and I cannot
> reproduce the good failures of your ectaart results. Looking at the
> following commit that reverted the tests
> 
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/8a4c9b6/lyxgit
> 
> a good guess is that you have a TeX Live that is more updated than mine.
> I have intentionally not updated my TeX Live because I wanted to wait
> until we had 0 test failures and then update TeX Live (holding fixed the
> LyX hash I tested at) to see what changes. I'm not sure if that day will
> come though so perhaps I should update also.
> 
> In your commit message with regards to ectaart can you reference commit
> 8a4c9b6 and put that we think the reason these exports started passing
> is because of your updated LuaTeX version? Put what LuaTeX your version
> is as the "good" version and mine as the "bad" version:
> 
>     Version beta-0.80.0 (TeX Live 2015) (rev 5238)

Interesting, I have the same version. So it may be some new luainputenc.sty 
and/or ectaart.cls.
But luainputenc.sty and ectaart.cls did not change at least from TL2013.

> Do you think your TeX Live update broken any non-inverted tests?

I don't think so.

> This is good news.

Now I am confused, what else may be the difference between our installations?

> Scott

        Kornel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to