On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:44:55AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:57:53PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 18:44:46, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> > > I am working on documentation for the export tests and other tests (e.g.
> > > check_lo
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 07:40:47PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:36:38AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:25:24, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:33:40PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > > But ATM all tests
Hello!
I'm trying to compile LyX for Windows: WinXP VirtualBox, Visual Studio
2010, Qt 5.5, all by the instructions in INSTALL.Win32
No matter what I do in CMake config, the compilation ends with the
messages I give below, and I have no idea what's happening and how to
fix it.
24> -- Inst
Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 20:02:34, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:52:13AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Today I got these tests (as failed, e.g. they should be OK now)
> >
> > 1779:INVERTED_SEE-README.ctest_export/examples/PDF-comment_dvi
> > 1782:INVERTED_SEE-READM
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:52:13AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Today I got these tests (as failed, e.g. they should be OK now)
>
> 1779:INVERTED_SEE-README.ctest_export/examples/PDF-comment_dvi
> 1782:INVERTED_SEE-README.ctest_export/examples/PDF-comment_pdf
> 1784:INVERTED_SEE-README.ctest_expor
Today I got these tests (as failed, e.g. they should be OK now)
1779:INVERTED_SEE-README.ctest_export/examples/PDF-comment_dvi
1782:INVERTED_SEE-README.ctest_export/examples/PDF-comment_pdf
1784:INVERTED_SEE-README.ctest_export/examples/PDF-comment_pdf3
1786:INVERTED_SEE-README.ctest_export/exampl
$ lyx2lyx -t 474 lib/examples/de/linguistics.lyx > /dev/null
Warning: content: Dies ist
Warning: content: This is
Warning: content: Dies ist
Warning: content: full of
Is that output expected? It is the same on the terminal as in the GUI
(exporting to 2.1.x).
Scott
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:36:38AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:25:24, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:33:40PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > But ATM all tests satisfying 'R tex2lyx' are identical to all tests
> > > inside the src/tex
Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:25:24, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:33:40PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 23:25:58, schrieb Georg Baum
> >
> > > Kornel Benko wrote:
> > >
> > > > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 17:51:10, schrieb Scott
Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:11:52PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:33:22PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > >> However, if the exit status of
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:33:40PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 23:25:58, schrieb Georg Baum
>
> > Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 17:51:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> > >
> > >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:44:17PM +0100, Georg Baum wr
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:11:52PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:33:22PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> However, if the exit status of an export test changes (from fail to
> >> pass or vice versa), we should check wh
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:45:38PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:12:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2015-10-29, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > words, the only place that knows whether the inputenc package is
> >
On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:33:22PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
...
>> However, if the exit status of an export test changes (from fail to
>> pass or vice versa), we should check whether this is due to a new bug,
>> a fix or just exposing previously hidden p
Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 22:54:43, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-10-30, Georg Baum wrote:
> > Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> >> This is easy, just add them in one of the scanned directories.
> >> To activate, rerun the configuration part (cmake .)
>
> >> After this they are accessible wit
Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 23:30:46, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 22:33:14, schrieb Georg Baum
> >
> >> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >>
> >> > Would another approach be to add a label? You can see the current
> >> > labels we have with:
> >> >
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Ah makes sense. Regarding for example Ubuntu LTS, how should we state
> such a rule? If LyX has a major release on May 1st 2016 does that mean
> we can depend on the latest versions in Ubuntu 16.04? That does not feel
> correct. So then something like "6 months after an LTS
On 2015-10-30, Georg Baum wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>> This is easy, just add them in one of the scanned directories.
>> To activate, rerun the configuration part (cmake .)
>> After this they are accessible with e.g.
>> ctest -R
>> The scanned directories (and subdirectories) are ATM
>>
On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:12:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-10-29, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
...
> words, the only place that knows whether the inputenc package is
> loaded is BufferParams::writeEncodingPreamble()
This is my understanding, t
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I was wrong---Qt 5.6 beta has now been delayed to 12 November. You can
> read the short discussion regarding the delay here:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.releasing/1826
> We have a few options as to what we should do about LyX 2.2.0 alpha:
>
> 1. Wait a c
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 22:33:14, schrieb Georg Baum
>
>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> > Would another approach be to add a label? You can see the current
>> > labels we have with:
>> >
>> > ctest --print-labels
>>
>> Since we'll need a new directory anyway (I d
Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 23:25:58, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 17:51:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:44:17PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Why the -R? The old version said to run ctest in the tex
Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 22:31:41, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > This is easy, just add them in one of the scanned directories.
> > To activate, rerun the configuration part (cmake .)
> >
> > After this they are accessible with e.g.
> > ctest -R
> >
> > The scanned
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 17:51:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:44:17PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>> >
>> > Why the -R? The old version said to run ctest in the tex2lyx test
>> > directory. This is more safe than using a regex that will also
Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 22:33:14, schrieb Georg Baum
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > Would another approach be to add a label? You can see the current labels
> > we have with:
> >
> > ctest --print-labels
>
> Since we'll need a new directory anyway (I don't think that pure test files
Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 17:51:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:44:17PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/lib/doc/Development.lyx b/lib/doc/Development.lyx
> > > index 0fbf144..d02aa68 100644
> > > --- a/lib/doc/Development.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:44:17PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/lib/doc/Development.lyx b/lib/doc/Development.lyx
> > index 0fbf144..d02aa68 100644
> > --- a/lib/doc/Development.lyx
> > +++ b/lib/doc/Development.lyx
> > @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ The tex2lyx tests
Richard Heck wrote:
> I guess my question then is what to do shorter term. It seems a bit late
> in the 2.2 cycle to do what we imagined above.
I don't think we need to do anything short-term. What we learned in this
discussion is that adding new styles to an existing layout can cause
problems
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/doc/Development.lyx b/lib/doc/Development.lyx
> index 0fbf144..d02aa68 100644
> --- a/lib/doc/Development.lyx
> +++ b/lib/doc/Development.lyx
> @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ The tex2lyx tests can be run by the commands
> status collapsed
>
> \begin_layout Plain
Kornel Benko wrote:
> This is easy, just add them in one of the scanned directories.
> To activate, rerun the configuration part (cmake .)
>
> After this they are accessible with e.g.
> ctest -R
>
> The scanned directories (and subdirectories) are ATM
> lib/doc, lib/examples, lib/templates
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Would another approach be to add a label? You can see the current labels
> we have with:
>
> ctest --print-labels
Since we'll need a new directory anyway (I don't think that pure test files
which are not installed should show up in any of the listed directories, we
d
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-29, Georg Baum wrote:
>> What do you mean by supported?
>
> I meant the oldest LyX-supported version, in other words the minimal
> required version for flawless working with LyX.
I see, I misunderstood "supported" as "supported by the TeXLive team".
> For 2.2,
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:29:49PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 06:16:30PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 09:13:12PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > > > Any other opinions?
> >
> > OK sounds like there is enough o
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:27:58AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 12:48 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 08:52:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> >>>2. Pavel's idea that for key dependencies such as Qt or TeX we should
> >>>look where stable/future versions on major
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:12:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-29, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> As my FIXME was wrong, so is your patch.
I see.
> > In regards to "Dont forget to keep this check in sync with the check
> > above!" this seems to be a good situation for a helper function in
On 10/29/2015 05:10 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
If we support the added style, then users who both use that style and
use an older version of the package will have non-compilable documents.
So you could have a document that worked perfectly well, you make one
change---use the new
On 10/29/2015 12:48 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 08:52:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
2. Pavel's idea that for key dependencies such as Qt or TeX we should
look where stable/future versions on major linux distros are. e.g.
stable debian. Another possibility is to look at t
On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 04:15:20PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> Dear LyXers,
>> documents that use the mhchem package (which is automatically loaded if
>> required, by default) fail to compile with XeTeX or LuaTeX and TeX fonts.
Actually, a minimal exampl
Dear LyX developers,
State of the art
LyX manuals currently use user-preamble code to set the font depending on
the export route and availability:
* Latin Modern (CM-extension) with PDF(luatex), PDF(pdflatex), if lmodern.sty
is installed
* CM-Super (another CM lookalike) with
On 2015-10-29, Georg Baum wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>1. A layout change can be made if it is supported by the current
>release of TeX Live and the previous release.
Actually also the pre-previous release (at least when I asked last time).
...
>>> I still think there is some use to
40 matches
Mail list logo
