Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Ah makes sense. Regarding for example Ubuntu LTS, how should we state
> such a rule? If LyX has a major release on May 1st 2016 does that mean
> we can depend on the latest versions in Ubuntu 16.04? That does not feel
> correct. So then something like "6 months after an LTS release" ?
> Meaning if we have a major release on May 1st 2016 then we could still
> only depend on Ubuntu 14.04 but if the major release is November 1st
> 2016 then we could depend on Ubuntu 16.04?

We should be able to reasonably run on the stable releases of 
major distros like debian/ubuntu lts, centos, opensuse.
And be rather on the conservative side in doubts (personal opinion :).

Stating more than that sounds like overkill.

Pavel

Reply via email to