On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 07:30:04AM +0100, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> commit 74059f6b5600c92166e66e9b6b78eda2b7b93331
> Author: Scott Kostyshak
> Date: Thu Oct 29 02:24:20 2015 -0400
>
> Document the export tests and other tests
>
> The export tests, check_load tests, and URL tests ar
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33
> Author: Günter Milde
> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39 2015 +0200
>
> Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".
>
> Fixes output for 3 of the 4 test lyx-f
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 08:52:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/28/2015 03:52 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> >It seems there are a few different ideas. Let me see if I can summarize
> >them:
> >
> >1. A layout change can be made if it is supported by the current release
> >of TeX Live and t
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:57:53PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 18:44:46, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > I am working on documentation for the export tests and other tests (e.g.
> > check_load).
> >
> > Kornel and I have often discussed ideas for tests we would li
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:28:00PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:31:50AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2015-10-26, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> > On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> >> Has anything changed in the last co
On 10/28/2015 03:59 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:29:51AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 26.10.2015 um 22:42 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
- There are 2 sorts of layout issues that could violate the rule:
1. Layouts for journals: We often had the discussion about this and my own
On 10/28/2015 03:52 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
It seems there are a few different ideas. Let me see if I can summarize
them:
1. A layout change can be made if it is supported by the current release
of TeX Live and the previous release. This rule can be less strict if
the only change is an added
I've been playing with SystemcallPrivate::startProcess (in
Systemcall.cpp) and latexEnvCmdPrefix (in filetools.cpp), in an attempt
to resolve the issue with missing BIBINPUTS, a 9 year old request at
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2645
Enrico mentioned there that setEnvironment couldn't be use
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 18:44:46, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> I am working on documentation for the export tests and other tests (e.g.
> check_load).
>
> Kornel and I have often discussed ideas for tests we would like to
> implement in the future, and now that others are running the tests
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 22:59:15, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 28.10.2015 um 19:55 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> > Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 18:56:39, schrieb Stephan Witt
> >
> >> Am 28.10.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >>
...
> > 2.) target updatetex2lyxtests, e.
I am working on documentation for the export tests and other tests (e.g.
check_load).
Kornel and I have often discussed ideas for tests we would like to
implement in the future, and now that others are running the tests they
might come up with ideas also. I have the feeling that these ideas do
not
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 23:29:30, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 23:02:08, schrieb Stephan Witt
>
> > Am 28.10.2015 um 22:49 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
> >
> > > > > It is only a bit
> > > > > annoying that I have to wait for a long time without getting an
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 23:02:08, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 28.10.2015 um 22:49 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
>
> > > > It is only a bit
> > > > annoying that I have to wait for a long time without getting any
> > > > feedback on the progress.
> > > >
> > > > Vincent
> > > >
> > >
>
On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:31:50AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2015-10-26, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> > On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> >> Has anything changed in the last couple of days?
>> I'l commit an updated FIXME.
> This does indeed sound
Am 28.10.2015 um 22:49 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
> > > It is only a bit
> > > annoying that I have to wait for a long time without getting any
> > > feedback on the progress.
> > >
> > > Vincent
> > >
> >
> > I don't feel guilty. I don't remember anyone saying anything about the
> > 'env'
Am 28.10.2015 um 19:55 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 18:56:39, schrieb Stephan Witt
>
>> Am 28.10.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:02:33PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 14:33:59, schrieb Korn
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 22:49:27, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > > It is only a bit
> > > annoying that I have to wait for a long time without getting any
> > > feedback on the progress.
> > >
> > > Vincent
> > >
> >
> > I don't feel guilty. I don't remember anyone saying anything ab
> > It is only a bit
> > annoying that I have to wait for a long time without getting any
> > feedback on the progress.
> >
> > Vincent
> >
>
> I don't feel guilty. I don't remember anyone saying anything about the
'env' command before.
>
> What do you mean with feedback about progress?
>
> Probabl
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 22:12:19, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> Using CMake version 2.8.10, all tex2lyx tests fail due to the use of
>
> file( TIMESTAMP .. )
>
> in runtests.cmake. The TIMESTAMP command is available since CMake 2.8.11.
>
> Vincent
Hm, should we now increase the mi
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 21:28:29, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> Op 28-10-2015 om 17:02 schreef Kornel Benko:
> > It looks like the relevant code to set environment for tests added by
> > add_test() command
> > is in the cmake-sources at lest since february 2009. Searching the net,
>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:46:58AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
> Yes, I understood this. But for the first try I didn't want to run it in
> parallel.
> I've observed that e.g. kpsewhich is used heavily while testing and one call
> took ~10ms.
> Perhaps there is some tuning possible?
My guess i
Using CMake version 2.8.10, all tex2lyx tests fail due to the use of
file( TIMESTAMP .. )
in runtests.cmake. The TIMESTAMP command is available since CMake 2.8.11.
Vincent
The entries that are different from the test_lstrings reference file are
for the inputs
{
...
1.3754937356458394574047e17,
1.3754937356458394574047e18,
1.3754937356458394574047e19,
1.3754937356458394574047e20,
...
1e42
}
and the outputs are:
{
...
137549373564583950
1375493735645839400
1375493
Op 28-10-2015 om 17:02 schreef Kornel Benko:
It looks like the relevant code to set environment for tests added by
add_test() command
is in the cmake-sources at lest since february 2009. Searching the net, there
are posts
mentioning cmake2.6 with this feature.
So I cannot imagine, why the patc
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:29:51AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 26.10.2015 um 22:42 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> - There are 2 sorts of layout issues that could violate the rule:
> 1. Layouts for journals: We often had the discussion about this and my own
> experience is that one MUST follow the l
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:16:03PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> > Am 26.10.2015 um 06:31 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> >
> >>> I think it is safe enough to support 2 years old features and would
> >>> therefore like to put it in.
> >>
> >> Do we have any policy on this? What have
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:19:14AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 02:34:54, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
>
> > Am 27.10.2015 um 08:09 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
> >
> > > So, to conclude, you should be able to run the test using:
> > >
> > > "ctest -R moderncv -C debug"
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:47:41PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> In case there was any misunderstanding: I am pretty sure that everybody
> agrees that the autotests (export tests, keytest etc) are not in a state
> that we can expect anybody to run them frequently.
Agreed. These tests are useful, f
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:56:39PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 28.10.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:02:33PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 14:33:59, schrieb Kornel Benko
> >>
> >>> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 12
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:51:28PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-28, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 11:45:46, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:36:26PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> >> > We should also create a directory containing
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 18:56:39, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 28.10.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:02:33PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 14:33:59, schrieb Kornel Benko
> >>
> >>> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 u
Am 28.10.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:02:33PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 14:33:59, schrieb Kornel Benko
>>
>>> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 12:34:47, schrieb Kornel Benko
>>>
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 1
On 2015-10-28, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 11:45:46, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:36:26PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> > We should also create a directory containing some uncompilable lyx-files
>> > which are supposed
>> > to compile in the
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:16:55PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 11:45:46, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:36:26PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > > We should also create a directory containing some uncompilable lyx-files
> > > which a
On 10/25/2015 04:04 AM, Georg Baum wrote:
After thinking more about this I now think it makes sense. I did also
implement the documentation toolbar. I think the toolbar should definitely
go in. What do others think about the renaming?
Thanks Georg. And +1 for the toolbar.
(apologies, posting
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:02:33PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 14:33:59, schrieb Kornel Benko
>
> > Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 12:34:47, schrieb Kornel Benko
> >
> > > Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 11:48:20, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > >
> > >
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 11:45:46, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:36:26PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > We should also create a directory containing some uncompilable lyx-files
> > which are supposed
> > to compile in the future due to corrected handling in lyx.
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 14:33:59, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 12:34:47, schrieb Kornel Benko
>
> > Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 11:48:20, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> >
> > > >>
> > > >> Well yes, there is no "env" command on Windows.
>
> ...
>
> I
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:36:26PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> We should also create a directory containing some uncompilable lyx-files
> which are supposed
> to compile in the future due to corrected handling in lyx.
>
> How about "development/attic/testdocs"?
>
> They would be the first to t
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:24:23AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > OK. I just want to make sure we define "there are no regressions". These
> > tests passed before edd37de8. So it is quite possible that documents
> > that users have that compile with LyX 2
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:33:22PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-26, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> Could this prevent some of the regressions? (We need to look carefully, not
>
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 11:22:31, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:59:05AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:17:15AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> > >> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > >> > -% increase l
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:59:05AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:17:15AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> >> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> >> > -% increase link area for cross-references and autoname them,
> >> > -\AtBeginDocument{\renewc
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:31:50AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-26, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> Has anything changed in the last couple of days?
>
> Today, I found out that the problem is tricky:
>
> As the PDF-Info does not use TeX fonts, Xe/Lu
On 2015-10-21, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:27:29PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
...
>> There are some more "easyfix" patches in the pipeline:
...
>> and a symbols-invdiameter.patch:
>> diff --git a/lib/symbols b/lib/symbols
>> index 89fc41a..992f556 100644
>> --- a/lib/sym
Le 23/10/2015 21:47, Georg Baum a écrit :
I did not know that mechanism. This looks indeed nice. However, I wonder
whether the condition for ignoring hor_pos should be the same as the one
used for LaTeX output. When looking at your patch I could not see whether
both places are equivalent. Anyway
Le 25/10/2015 12:04, Georg Baum a écrit :
PhilipPirrip wrote:
LibreOffice has it as "Special Characters". Fedora Linux has an
application called "Character Map" that lists characters by, I believe,
unicode blocks.
And all those are just single characters. Symbols, though, can be one or
more: Gr
On 2015-10-14, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:26:35AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Benjamin Piwowarski
>> wrote:
...
>> > sorry for the long delay - I started to clean up python scripts to
>> > make them compatible with both python 2 and
On 2015-10-27, Georg Baum wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> A proper fix would be to use lib/unicodesymbols for the content of the
>> hypersetup.
> It has been discussed in the past to use lib/unicodesymbols replacements for
> the preamble, but there was some important reason not to do it (which
On 2015-10-26, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:31:49PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> With the latest 2 fixes (36b9645b5de6d463b4909 and 2aa65fdc8d2cde1ba863),
> all 4 test files compile.
>>> >> >> Includes "FIXME"s at places where fur
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 02:34:54, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 27.10.2015 um 08:09 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>
> > So, to conclude, you should be able to run the test using:
> >
> > "ctest -R moderncv -C debug" or "ctest -R moderncv -C release"
>
> many thanks Vinncent and Kornel!
>
>
51 matches
Mail list logo
