Re: View/compile reduced size PDF within LyX

2015-02-09 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:04 AM, James wrote: >> > > On a similar note, AFAIK most of the size reduction comes from Ghostscript > reducing the size of the raster images and those with raster components. The > next level of usability (beyond using a converter on a whole document) would > be to hav

Re: #8734: Error importing Rnw file to Lyx: Rscript fails on setwd(.cmdargs[4])

2015-02-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 02/09/2015 06:32 PM, Bill Shobe wrote: Thanks for looking into it. I’m still getting the error I originally reported. The file produces a PDF within R, but I can’t get it to import to LYX. An error occurred while running: Rscript --verbose --no-save --no-restore "/Applications/LyX.app/Conten

Re: #8734: Error importing Rnw file to Lyx: Rscript fails on setwd(.cmdargs[4])

2015-02-09 Thread Bill Shobe
Thanks for looking into it. I’m still getting the error I originally reported. The file produces a PDF within R, but I can’t get it to import to LYX. An error occurred while running: Rscript --verbose --no-save --no-restore "/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/scripts/lyxknitr.R" "/Users/wms

Re: 2.2 (was: Re: Retina support)

2015-02-09 Thread stefano franchi
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: > > As far as I am concerned, I'd just like to land the scroll-reloaded > branch > > ASAP. It will not improve any more without testing. > > > > Who has plans for 2.2 that have n

Re: View/compile reduced size PDF within LyX

2015-02-09 Thread James
> > > On a similar note, AFAIK most of the size reduction comes from Ghostscript reducing the size of the raster images and those with raster components. The next level of usability (beyond using a converter on a whole document) would be to have an option within the figure float setting or graphic

Re: Source Tarballs for 2.1.3

2015-02-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 09.02.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Richard Heck: What is about the Japanese beamer example file? It is not part of the tarball? I forgot to add it to the Makefile. You can release a new version if you like with it included. I may do the same, but after the official release. I assumed this and t

Re: View/compile reduced size PDF within LyX

2015-02-09 Thread James
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > > Agreed. I would only propose that we provide two additional > converters: one for TeX fonts and other for non-TeX fonts. Since this > would be for draft, non-final documents, it really should not matter > less which exact converter of eac

Stable Branch is Open Again

2015-02-09 Thread Richard Heck
As said. There were quite a few bugs with 2.1.3 milestones that have been fixed in master. You may get emails about these. It'd be nice to get the fixes pushed to stable if possible as early as we can. Richard

Re: AW: Source Tarballs for 2.1.3

2015-02-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 02/09/2015 03:41 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Uwe Stöhr wrote: OK. Please note that the date was wrong in the original tarball: 2014 instead of 2015. I uploaded a new one earlier today. Hi Richard, I grabbed the new tarball and prepared the installers: https:// ‎sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwinins

Re: View/compile reduced size PDF within LyX

2015-02-09 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Liviu Andronic wrote: > >> Actually my observation would be different, and IMO this is a somewhat >> oft-requested feature: >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/127499 >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/73209 >

Re: Yet more static analysis: Use Coverity?

2015-02-09 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Liviu Andronic wrote: > >> I propose that whenever someone finds some item particularly yummy, >> and they start looking more closely into the issue, that they >> nominally assign themselves to that item so that others would know >> that someone

Re: View/compile reduced size PDF within LyX

2015-02-09 Thread Georg Baum
Liviu Andronic wrote: > Actually my observation would be different, and IMO this is a somewhat > oft-requested feature: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/127499 > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/73209 Sorry, it looks I am suffering from the selective memory d

Re: Yet more static analysis: Use Coverity?

2015-02-09 Thread Georg Baum
Liviu Andronic wrote: > I propose that whenever someone finds some item particularly yummy, > and they start looking more closely into the issue, that they > nominally assign themselves to that item so that others would know > that someone is already working on it. (OK, that was unnecessarily > ve

Re: AW: Source Tarballs for 2.1.3

2015-02-09 Thread Georg Baum
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > OK. Please note that the date was wrong in the original tarball: 2014 > instead of 2015. I uploaded a new one earlier today. > > Hi Richard, > > I grabbed the new tarball and prepared the installers: > https:// ‎sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/ > > I also fine-tun

Re: AW: Source Tarballs for 2.1.3

2015-02-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 02/09/2015 10:11 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: OK. Please note that the date was wrong in the original tarball: 2014 instead of 2015. I uploaded a new one earlier today. Hi Richard, I grabbed the new tarball and prepared the installers: https:// ‎sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/ I also fine

AW: Source Tarballs for 2.1.3

2015-02-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr
OK. Please note that the date was wrong in the original tarball: 2014 instead of 2015. I uploaded a new one earlier today. Hi Richard, I grabbed the new tarball and prepared the installers: https:// ‎sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/ I also fine-tuned the status21 file a bit. What is