Re: Feature Suggestion: Copy Selection as Latex

2013-08-20 Thread Liviu Andronic
Dear Sebastien, As Pavel suggested LyX already has basic support for various Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) - Maple, Maxima, Octave, Mathematica. Usually you write some math, c-menu on the math inset and select your favourite CAS. The trouble with this support, and it has been discussed previously

Re: trunk: Style Chunk

2013-08-20 Thread Richard Heck
On 08/20/2013 03:36 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: In lyx2.0 we had "Style Chunk" and now we have only "InsetLayout Flex:Chunk". But we have also files using the style (which is ATM 'unknown') Can we please get it back? Inserted maybe in litinsets.inc? The chunk styles are meant to be converted

Re: AGUTeX template: agutex.cls -> AGUTeX.cls

2013-08-20 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> The cls has changed case and thus breaks compilation of the template. >> >> The old file is still there: >> ftp://ftp.agu.org/journals/latex/journals/Manuscript-Preparation/ >> >>

Re: AGUTeX template: agutex.cls -> AGUTeX.cls

2013-08-20 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > The cls has changed case and thus breaks compilation of the template. > > The old file is still there: > ftp://ftp.agu.org/journals/latex/journals/Manuscript-Preparation/ > > but I contacted the journal (la...@agu.org) and was told to use t

trunk: Style Chunk

2013-08-20 Thread Kornel Benko
In lyx2.0 we had "Style Chunk" and now we have only "InsetLayout Flex:Chunk". But we have also files using the style (which is ATM 'unknown') Can we please get it back? Inserted maybe in litinsets.inc? Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Unicodesymbols requirements ignored

2013-08-20 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 20.08.2013 um 16:38 schrieb Stephan Witt : > Am 19.08.2013 um 10:44 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > >> Stephan Witt wrote: >>> So, we have to revert the addition of subdir-objects to the AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE >> >> I'll do this in a minute. >> >>> option list. But there will be a problem in the fu

Re: Unicodesymbols requirements ignored

2013-08-20 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 19.08.2013 um 10:44 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Stephan Witt wrote: >> So, we have to revert the addition of subdir-objects to the AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE > > I'll do this in a minute. > >> option list. But there will be a problem in the future. One idea I have to >> solve this: Split the Encodin

Re: Reviews of commits

2013-08-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
01/08/2013 20:19, Hashini Senaratne: I carefully followed your reviews and modified the code accordingly. Your comments on them were really useful. Hello Hashini, I am now back from vacation for a week and took the time to review the current code and change it according to the ideas that we h

Re: Instant Preview tag in flex insets?

2013-08-20 Thread Richard Heck
On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: I tinker, and in a number of the resulting custom insets it is natural to place the inset in an instant preview inset. That means two steps: inserting the custom inset and putting it in an instant preview inset. One step would be better. I envisage

Re: cmake build: man pages

2013-08-20 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag, 16. August 2013 um 10:04:15, schrieb Pavel Sanda > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > This can be overridden by call to cmake. It's a default only. > > > > > > I see it's even default for autotools, let it be this way. > > > > > > Pavel > > > > Thanks. If nobody else screams, I will commit

Re: unicodesymbols and tex2lyx

2013-08-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
20/08/2013 12:32, Guenter Milde: While there is always one unique code point per Unicode character, there are many characters with multiple LICR LaTeX macros. This means that for tex2lyx, we should rather use an additional ressource for the LICR alias -> Unicode mappings. We could either extend

Re: unicodesymbols and tex2lyx

2013-08-20 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2013-08-20, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 20/08/2013 01:03, Guenter Milde: >> I cannot say when. Have a look inside t1enc.def, there you see definitions >> like >> \DeclareTextComposite{\`}{T1}{\i}{236} >> \DeclareTextComposite{\'}{T1}{i}{237} >> ... > It looks like this happened in May 2001,

Re: unicodesymbols and tex2lyx

2013-08-20 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > It looks like this happened in May 2001, and nobody told me... I'm shocked. And one day you will wake up into the world when 'k' will be no more. And no one will tell you because there will be no way how to point at it :) Pavel

Re: unicodesymbols and tex2lyx

2013-08-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
20/08/2013 01:03, Guenter Milde: I cannot say when. Have a look inside t1enc.def, there you see definitions like \DeclareTextComposite{\`}{T1}{\i}{236} \DeclareTextComposite{\'}{T1}{i}{237} ... It looks like this happened in May 2001, and nobody told me... I'm shocked. One less LaTeX idiosync