Am 20.03.2013 00:27, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
can the following things go in to branch too?:
- make Kazakh documents compilable:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/5619ebeda25cee690006876a9ded0c375573e530/lyxgit
I retract this one because it is not worth to backport this piece as Kazakh will anyway
ping!
Hello all!
I have tried to make this template to work, but there is something wrong
with my javascript.
Could anyone please help me to get this running
Best Regards
Alex
pdf-forms.lyx
Description: application/lyx
On 2013-03-18, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> As there seems to be a consensus about releasing 2.1. I want to ignite
> the LyX 2.1 release procedure.
> Before I come up with a planning and/or a feature freeze, I would like
> to know what the status of the current trunk is.
> - What is the ove
On 2013-03-19, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 19.03.2013 12:27, schrieb Guenter Milde:
> I found now a babel support for Serbian Cyrillic:
> http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/babel-contrib/serbianc
> it works fine, the same as the other non-native babel support files
> like e.g. for Lit
2013/3/20 Pavel Sanda:
> GuiCharacter.cpp:
> // FIXME: hack to work around resizing bug in Qt >= 4.2
> // bug verified with Qt 4.2.{0-3} (JSpitzm)
> #if QT_VERSION >= 0x040200
> // qt resizes the comboboxes only after show(), so ...
> QDialog::show();
> #endif
>
> GuiDocument.cpp:
>
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > Did we decide on 4.5.0? I seem to remember that we did, but we should
> > perhaps make sure everyone still agrees with that decision.
>
> Yes we did and most ifdefs are already deleted by me together with changes
> in README/INSTALL.
Looked back on the
Richard Heck wrote:
> Did we decide on 4.5.0? I seem to remember that we did, but we should
> perhaps make sure everyone still agrees with that decision.
Yes we did and most ifdefs are already deleted by me together with changes
in README/INSTALL.
Pavel
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2013 um 18:57:55, schrieb Kornel Benko
>
>
>> > Attached are three CMake logs. "afterchange" refers to 0f26aabe
>
>> > (current trunk). "beforechange" refers to d4c2fce8 (the commit before
>
>> > your CMake commit).
>
>>
Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2013 um 18:57:55, schrieb Kornel Benko
> > Attached are three CMake logs. "afterchange" refers to 0f26aabe
> > (current trunk). "beforechange" refers to d4c2fce8 (the commit before
> > your CMake commit).
> >
> > "oldcmake" refers to using CMake version 2.8.7 and "newcmake"
On 03/20/2013 12:08 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 18/03/2013 21:17, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit :
Hi all,
As there seems to be a consensus about releasing 2.1. I want to ignite
the LyX 2.1 release procedure.
Before I come up with a planning and/or a feature freeze, I would like
to know
Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2013 um 13:40:30, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2013 um 11:31:14, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >
> >
> >> Le 20/03/2013 11:07, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >
> >> > No one? I am tempted to commit.
> >
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2013 um 11:31:14, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
>
>> Le 20/03/2013 11:07, Kornel Benko a écrit :
>
>> > No one? I am tempted to commit.
>
>>
>
>> I think you should. It is always better to use the standard tools when
>
Hello all!
I have tried to make this template to work, but there is something wrong
with my javascript.
Could anyone please help me to get this running
Best Regards
Alex
pdf-forms.lyx
Description: application/lyx
Le 18/03/2013 21:17, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit :
Hi all,
As there seems to be a consensus about releasing 2.1. I want to ignite
the LyX 2.1 release procedure.
Before I come up with a planning and/or a feature freeze, I would like
to know what the status of the current trunk is.
- What is
- Original Message -
From: Neal Becker
To: Alex Vergara Gil
Cc: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org ; lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: editing math in lyx
Any convenient shortcut to select the content of the formula? I thought
clicking in
Any convenient shortcut to select the content of the formula? I thought
clicking inside the math formula and choosing 'select whole inset' from
edit menu would do it, but seems to insist on selecting entire document!
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
>
>> I would really
Sorry for the wrong thread answer! This is the correct one
Attached there is a MWE of how to produce this forms in LyX (is in spanish
but the idea remains for every language).
HTH, if anyone is so kind to translate this and upload to the wiki please
be
welcome
Alex
pdf-forms.lyx
Descript
I would really love to be able to conveniently edit the TeX code
directly - I'd
be vastly more productive. I find lyx gui editing - as all other math
editors -
to be terribly frustrating and unproductive. I used LaTeX since 1980s,
and the
lack of this is the only thing that makes me think tw
I would really love to be able to conveniently edit the TeX code
directly - I'd
be vastly more productive. I find lyx gui editing - as all other math
editors -
to be terribly frustrating and unproductive. I used LaTeX since 1980s,
and the
lack of this is the only thing that makes me think tw
On 03/20/2013 07:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2013/3/20 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This looks like a great solution. I propose that you put it in.
Actually, it isn't that great, since it covers the real problem, and
also I discovered that the toolbar _position_ is still wrong if you
try to
2013/3/20 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This looks like a great solution. I propose that you put it in.
Actually, it isn't that great, since it covers the real problem, and
also I discovered that the toolbar _position_ is still wrong if you
try to show the affected toolbar (fixed size delimiters i
Le 15/03/2013 21:44, Georg Baum a écrit :
Some time ago we had a discussion about what changes to layout files are
allowed in a stable release. There were several proposals, from simple but
limited to powerful but complicated. Meanwhile I had another idea which is
IMHO quite simple but still powe
Le 20/03/2013 09:42, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
2013/3/20 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
2013/3/20 Jürgen Spitzmüller:
The attached patch fixes the problem for me. Looks straightforward
enough, doesn't it?
OK, this causes toolbar flickering. The attached one performs better.
Thoughts?
I digged fur
Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Guenter Milde"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 3:35 AM
> Subject: Re: editing math in lyx
>
>
>> Third method:
>>
>> * select and cut the fraction
>> * paste into text - will appear as LaTeX macros
>> * edit
>> * cut and pa
Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2013 um 11:31:14, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 20/03/2013 11:07, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > No one? I am tempted to commit.
>
> I think you should. It is always better to use the standard tools when
> possible.
>
> JMarc
Thanks, done. We shall see, if there are prob
Le 20/03/2013 11:07, Kornel Benko a écrit :
No one? I am tempted to commit.
I think you should. It is always better to use the standard tools when
possible.
JMarc
Am Dienstag, 19. März 2013 um 13:53:10, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Dienstag, 19. März 2013 um 13:01:42, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
> > for frontend in $FRONTENDS ; do
> >case "$frontend" in
> > qt4)
> > - QT4_DO_IT_ALL
> > + QT4_DO_IT_ALL([4.5.0])
> > FRONT
2013/3/20 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> 2013/3/20 Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> The attached patch fixes the problem for me. Looks straightforward
>> enough, doesn't it?
>
> OK, this causes toolbar flickering. The attached one performs better.
>
> Thoughts?
I digged further, and it turned out that it is enough
2013/3/20 Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> The attached patch fixes the problem for me. Looks straightforward
> enough, doesn't it?
OK, this causes toolbar flickering. The attached one performs better.
Thoughts?
Jürgen
8520-2.diff
Description: Binary data
2013/3/19 Georg Baum:
>>> Actually my minor quibble here is the unwanted appearance of the IPA
>>> toolbars any time I start lyx
>>
>> Yeah, they are a real PITA.
>
> This is caused by reading/writing the session info at the wrong time. I did
> some analysis of the problem at http://www.lyx.org/tra
2013/3/19 Georg Baum:
> The only thing I want to see in 2.1.0 is any solution for the layout
> backward compatibility problem: It should be possible to introduce new
> styles in 2.1.x releases that would still work with 2.1.x-1. Without this
> feature we would probably get lengthy discussions again
31 matches
Mail list logo
