Re: Inset::editable and inset-settings

2009-04-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Ok ? Could you wait just a bit with this until my indices patch is in? Jürgen

Re: r29245 & r29246

2009-04-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > To branch ? OK. Jürgen

Re: r29248 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-04-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > This reverts the previous fix which caused the regression in branch. > Shall I revert the previous fix in branch and postpone the new bug fix > to 1.6.4 so that it can be tested for a while. Good idea. Jürgen

Re: [patch] bug 2213: previous change in GuiChanges

2009-04-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > The patch consists now of r29108 -- r29111, r29115, r29250 and r29251. > > Still ok fro branch ? It is OK. But I do not mind either if you postpone it to 1.6.4. Jürgen

Re: Insert->Bibtex Entry.. ?

2009-04-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Is there a reason, you can't insert a bibitem from the menu ? Otherwise > I'll add it. When would it be needed? The item is automatically added if you insert a new paragraph in a Bibliography environment > + Item "BibTeX Item..." "dialog-show-new-ins

Re: Insert->Bibtex Entry.. ?

2009-04-15 Thread Richard Heck
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, Is there a reason, you can't insert a bibitem from the menu ? Otherwise I'll add it. I think maybe the reason is that bibitems can only go in certain special places, i.e., aren't supposed to appear at random points in the text. So you don't really want

Re: [patch] bug 2213: previous change in GuiChanges

2009-04-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: This patch adds reverse change searching to the GuiChanges dialog. Ok ? Juergen, do you want this in branch too ? Yes, OK. Jürgen The patch consists now of r29108 -- r29111,

LyX home page oddity

2009-04-15 Thread Guenter Milde
On www.lyx.org, I read: On screen, LyX looks like any word processor; its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like nothing else. However, my experience is: ... its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produ

Re: Inset::editable and inset-settings

2009-04-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Richard Heck schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I propose the following to finish up the recoding of LFUN_INSET_SETTINGS. - The getStatus() handling of LFUN_INSET_SETTINGS is handled in Inset and it is now checked whether the argument (if one) corresponds to the current inset. - To dec

Re: Inset::editable and inset-settings

2009-04-15 Thread Richard Heck
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I propose the following to finish up the recoding of LFUN_INSET_SETTINGS. - The getStatus() handling of LFUN_INSET_SETTINGS is handled in Inset and it is now checked whether the argument (if one) corresponds to the current inset. - To decide the status we need a

Insert->Bibtex Entry.. ?

2009-04-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all, Is there a reason, you can't insert a bibitem from the menu ? Otherwise I'll add it. Richard, if I insert a bibitem (with the patch), I always get the message that the label already exists and that the label will be renamed. Could you have a look at this ? Vincent Index: lib/u

Inset::editable and inset-settings

2009-04-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
I propose the following to finish up the recoding of LFUN_INSET_SETTINGS. - The getStatus() handling of LFUN_INSET_SETTINGS is handled in Inset and it is now checked whether the argument (if one) corresponds to the current inset. - To decide the status we need an updated editable() mechanism

Re: Cmake and po building

2009-04-15 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 15/04/2009 09:31, Kornel Benko wrote: Am 2009-04-15 schrieb Kornel Benko: Am 2009-04-15 schrieb Kornel Benko: Am 2009-04-14 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: Hello Kornel, I am a bit annoyed that po building is done at each compilation, couldn't this be made optional or being do

Re: r29248 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-04-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
v...@lyx.org schreef: Author: vfr Date: Wed Apr 15 22:20:42 2009 New Revision: 29248 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29248 Log: Fix bug #5435. Revert the previous fix and fix the DEPM regression. This reverts r28910. Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Cursor.cpp Modified: lyx-devel/tru

Re: r29245 & r29246

2009-04-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
v...@lyx.org schreef: Author: vfr Date: Wed Apr 15 18:42:38 2009 New Revision: 29245 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29245 Log: Fix bug 5894: Inserting tabs with inline selections. Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/insets/InsetListings.cpp Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/insets/InsetListin

Re: Oddity in Intro.lyx

2009-04-15 Thread Richard Heck
Helge Hafting wrote: grep -i -C 8 extended *.lyx Turns up: DocStyle.lyx mentions Extended.lyx, but that use is perhaps ok. The word "extended" occur some times where it is not referring to a manual. The Tutorial mentions "Extended" once, which I hope to remove. The User's Guide mentions "Exte

Re: Oddity in Intro.lyx

2009-04-15 Thread Helge Hafting
Richard Heck wrote: Helge Hafting wrote: I am updating the Norwegian translation of Intro.lyx, which had fallen behind. while doing this, I noticed the following oddity in the original: = You'll also see something like “(See ‘Extended’)” from time to time. We've listed the possible defau

Re: Auto-generation of Labels

2009-04-15 Thread Helge Hafting
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > 1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to > make a "cross reference" to a section or subsection, without adding a > label? So the user might say "As defined in s. 10.91" without having > to go to section 10.91 and adding a label? How should that

Re: Oddity in Intro.lyx

2009-04-15 Thread Richard Heck
Helge Hafting wrote: I am updating the Norwegian translation of Intro.lyx, which had fallen behind. while doing this, I noticed the following oddity in the original: = You'll also see something like “(See ‘Extended’)” from time to time. We've listed the possible default keybindings for a

RE: Oddity in Intro.lyx

2009-04-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>This seems to refer to two documents: "Extended", as well as the >"Additional Features Manual" too. But the "Additional Features Manual" >is named "extended.lyx", so these are the same thing. > >This looks somewhat off to me - or did I misunderstand something? We changed the title of the "Ext

Re: Amir Younes is born

2009-04-15 Thread Helge Hafting
Congratulations! Helge Hafting

Oddity in Intro.lyx

2009-04-15 Thread Helge Hafting
I am updating the Norwegian translation of Intro.lyx, which had fallen behind. while doing this, I noticed the following oddity in the original: = You'll also see something like “(See ‘Extended’)” from time to time. We've listed the possible default keybindings for a function in its entry

Two Trac wishes

2009-04-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
1/ Currently, trac changes come from t...@puben.org (default fedora setting?). This looks weird. Could the from address be changed to some @lyx.org address instead? It would be even nicer to able to answer by e-mail, like we could do with bugzilla. 2/ Lars, can you enable the drop down list for a

Re: Cmake and po building

2009-04-15 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Kornel Benko schreef: Am 2009-04-15 schrieb Kornel Benko: Am 2009-04-14 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW: I'm annoyed that building the documentation is turned on by default. I always have one project failing, because I don't have perl. Could this be turned off by default in MSVC (i

Re: Cmake and po building

2009-04-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am 2009-04-15 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am 2009-04-14 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW: > > > > > > > I'm annoyed that building the documentation is turned on by default. I > > always have one project failing, because I don't have perl. Could this > > be turned off by default in MSVC (if you don

Re: Cmake and po building

2009-04-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am 2009-04-15 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am 2009-04-15 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Am 2009-04-14 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > > > Hello Kornel, > > > > > > I am a bit annoyed that po building is done at each compilation, > > > couldn't this be made optional or being done with "make install" or > > >