On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 01:36:59AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:09:53AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> > > First "Default" is not not enough information as we don't know which
> > > font is default in each of the combo. We should at l
Hi Uwe,
On 01/08/2008, at 3:19 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> A beautiful default would be best.
This is pain. CM are not beautiful? Beauty is a matter of taste, but
to be objective, CM are very well designed.
The only concrete thing that can be said here is that the LM fonts are
an improvement
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:09:53AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > First "Default" is not not enough information as we don't know which
> > font is default in each of the combo. We should at least indicate what
> > is the current default (I assume CM)
>
> You as
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> So sorry for the noise. I updated Peter Gumm's LyX xypic manual and will
> reference it in the docs.
>
> regards Uwe
I have just read the manual and was delighted by this package. I think it would
be good idea to put this manual into our LyX examples directory. For this
small
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:09:53AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> First "Default" is not not enough information as we don't know which
> font is default in each of the combo. We should at least indicate what
> is the current default (I assume CM)
You assume wrong. Default means whatever font
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
what i see now we could do:
1. some better advertisment of lmodern usage. i'm using lyx for years and
without
Will i won't be aware about this.
Me neither. Discoverability is important in GUI design.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> what i see now we could do:
>> 1. some better advertisment of lmodern usage. i'm using lyx for years and
>> without
>> Will i won't be aware about this.
>
> Me neither. Discoverability is important in GUI design.
do you have an idea what could
Pavel Sanda wrote:
what i see now we could do:
1. some better advertisment of lmodern usage. i'm using lyx for years
and without
Will i won't be aware about this.
Me neither. Discoverability is important in GUI design.
2. i wanted to setup lmodern as default at least for me, but ouch, we
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > I personally agree with Will. Most users won't know how to change the
> document font; I barely know > myself.
>
> What? It's just a click in the document settings under fonts. A more
> detailed description is given in the UserGuide.
>
> > A beautiful default would be best.
>
Anders Ekberg wrote:
On 31 jul 2008, at 13.58, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Anders Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the current trunk on Mac (OS X 10.5) the File->Open... dialogue
has in
the Enable-pop-up menu first the entry LyX Documents and then three x
Documen
Pavel Sanda wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
The option to remove paragraph justification would also be nice :)
Menu Edit->Paragraph settings
Oh, I meant for the LyX display of text :)
i rememember there was announced speci
> I personally agree with Will. Most users won't know how to change the document font; I barely
know > myself.
What? It's just a click in the document settings under fonts. A more detailed description is given
in the UserGuide.
> A beautiful default would be best.
This is pain. CM are not be
>> Why do you think we should especially use LM and not TeXGyre or one of the
various other
>> beautiful fonts? There's no special reason to prefer LM over others. So
we'll let the default
>> font the default one - CM.
>
> In that case you shouldn't use the T1 font encoding by default, because t
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:55:45PM +0930, Will Robertson wrote:
> I'm surprised, and happy, to hear that you use T1 only when possible.
Yes, if you launch LyX from a console and look at the output when
reconfiguring, you will see that a check for EC fonts is being made.
If you are not comfortab
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:27:08PM +0200, Máté Salát wrote:
> In an environment like \text{...} is it possible
> (1) to make line break?
No, but it is rather strange that you need a line break in \text.
Maybe you should think better at what you would like to accomplish.
If, for some obscure reaso
On 31/07/2008, at 11:10 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Will Robertson wrote:
On 31/07/2008, at 11:00 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
for this you need to set hyperref settings in document otpions. in
that
case the preamble created by lyx will be of course more complex.
I'm running v1.5.6, and I've triple-
On 31/07/2008, at 11:04 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The glyphs are the same, so that is not the point. The point is that
LM fonts come in a vector (rather than bitmap) format making them
more
suitable to pdf output.
but the main point i got from previous messages was be
On Thursday 31 July 2008 02:58, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I personally agree with Will. Most users won't know how to change the
> document font; I barely know myself. A beautiful default would be best.
:s/beautiful/readable/
SteveT
Will Robertson wrote:
> On 31/07/2008, at 11:00 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
>> for this you need to set hyperref settings in document otpions. in that
>> case the preamble created by lyx will be of course more complex.
>
> I'm running v1.5.6, and I've triple-checked, but I don't see any hyperref
> se
On 31/07/2008, at 11:00 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
for this you need to set hyperref settings in document otpions. in
that
case the preamble created by lyx will be of course more complex.
I'm running v1.5.6, and I've triple-checked, but I don't see any
hyperref settings?
Will
smime.p7s
De
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> The glyphs are the same, so that is not the point. The point is that
> LM fonts come in a vector (rather than bitmap) format making them more
> suitable to pdf output.
but the main point i got from previous messages was better kerning... ?
pavel
Will Robertson wrote:
> Personally, since LaTeX is so hard to master with all its packages, I would
> have thought you'd want to steer LyX users into the more fruitful areas
> (such as hyperref) that are currently a little tricky to get "just right".
for this you need to set hyperref settings in
Hi Enrico,
I'm surprised, and happy, to hear that you use T1 only when possible.
Thanks!
Surely just checking for LM doesn't trigger installation under
MiKTeX?! Instead of using kpsewhich, couldn't you just mechanically
search for the actual files? (After all, you can get the base
direc
On 31/07/2008, at 8:57 PM, Máté Salát wrote:
Actually there are two other issues you could help how it is elegant
to accomplish.
In an environment like \text{...} is it possible
(1) to make line break?
(2) to open an inner math mode?
No, and yes.
For example how would you make the attached
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:46:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> OK, thanks for the explanation. The fact that they are suitable to pdf
> output is a good argument for making them the default, at least for
> pdflatex conversion (which the majority uses I guess by now). Perhaps
> this this a
On 31 jul 2008, at 13.58, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Anders Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the current trunk on Mac (OS X 10.5) the File->Open... dialogue
has in
the Enable-pop-up menu first the entry LyX Documents and then three x
Documents entries. Is this
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 08:58:07AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Will Robertson wrote:
So you don't think it's confusing to have *three* choices in the list
of fonts that look, on casual inspection, exactly the same? And rather
un-helpful to have AE when LM
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 08:58:07AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Will Robertson wrote:
> > On 31/07/2008, at 8:08 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> >
> >> Will Robertson schrieb:
> >>
> Better output is relative, we can another font as well as default.
> >>> No :) The LM fonts ARE better than the CM
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Anders Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the current trunk on Mac (OS X 10.5) the File->Open... dialogue has in
> the Enable-pop-up menu first the entry LyX Documents and then three x
> Documents entries. Is this intentional as placeholders or a bug?
Looks
Thanks for the tips from both of you.
Actually there are two other issues you could help how it is elegant to
accomplish.
In an environment like \text{...} is it possible
(1) to make line break?
(2) to open an inner math mode?
For example how would you make the attached formula? I used \substac
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Will Robertson wrote:
On 30/07/2008, at 5:18 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Will Robertson wrote:
On 30/07/2008, at 4:01 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I confirm this bug. Could you please put this in bugzilla.lyx.org?
Well, it's not so much a bug as a bad design deci
31 matches
Mail list logo
