Dominik Böhm wrote:
Hello again,
bug that makes lyx crash.
I was able to reproduce one critical
Create a new file, insert one section at the beginning and then a
formula with a matrix (it doesn't matter if it's an inline formula or a
display one). Then toggle the outline view. If the cursor i
Dominik Böhm wrote:
Hello again,
I was able to reproduce one critical bug that makes lyx crash.
Create a new file, insert one section at the beginning and then a
formula with a matrix (it doesn't matter if it's an inline formula or a
display one). Then toggle the outline view. If the cursor i
Hello again,
I was able to reproduce one critical bug that makes lyx crash.
Create a new file, insert one section at the beginning and then a formula
with a matrix (it doesn't matter if it's an inline formula or a display
one). Then toggle the outline view. If the cursor is still in the formula,
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 04:49:59PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> > I think this is the wrong fix. There is a reason for using minimalistic,
>> > and right click should always work.
>>
>> I discussed this with Richard in bug 4400 and bug 4401 and he agreed that
>> e.g. indexes an
> > A final question/request (which may go beyond what you want to do, so
> > feel free to ignore it): especially with widescreen monitors
> > (standard on Macs), fullscreen mode as currently implemented results
> > in unreadably long lines. Would it be possible to define line length
> > (or % of s
> Committed:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22928
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22929
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22930
don't forget to add some entry into wiki news for 1.6 :)
pavel
Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wouldn't a zoom/dpi trick result in not simply fewer characters per
> line but also fewer lines per screen? That would seem to defeat one
> of the purposes of going full screen: to maximize the number of lines.
Or rather do not change the width of lines
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I think this is the wrong fix. There is a reason for using
minimalistic,
> and right click should always work.
I discussed this with Richard in bug 4400 and bug 4401 and he agreed
that e.g. indexes and branches should have a label. People would
otherwise have problems to di
Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A final question/request (which may go beyond what you want to do, so
> feel free to ignore it): especially with widescreen monitors
> (standard on Macs), fullscreen mode as currently implemented results
> in unreadably long lines. Would it be possible to
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I wonder how long it takes until he turns to other pages (where similar
vandals are already active).
Can't we just disallow the use of %white% [[ ?
That's less easy I'm afraid :-(
One idea might be to require a password whenever some adds a URI
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Attached please find the latest versions of the visual mode for bidi
cursor movement patches. I fixed them up based on feedback (mainly from
Pavel and Abdel --- thanks!) Also, right movement is now included as
well. If there are no objections I will commit soon.
I b
> I think this is the wrong fix. There is a reason for using minimalistic,
> and right click should always work.
I discussed this with Richard in bug 4400 and bug 4401 and he agreed that e.g. indexes and branches
should have a label. People would otherwise have problems to distinguish between th
Dominik Böhm wrote:
Another thing that I would like to have fixed as soon as possible is the
find/replace dialog. The only thing that isn't working properly is, that LyX
doesn't scroll the current caret position into view.
This is be fixed in latest revision.
Abdel.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 05:21:01PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: uwestoehr
> Date: Sun Feb 10 18:20:59 2008
> New Revision: 22923
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22923
> Log:
> stdinsets.inc: use labels for certain inset types as we do currently in LyX
> 1.5 (fixes bug 4401
Dominik Böhm wrote:
Another thing that I would like to have fixed as soon as possible is the
find/replace dialog.
Known bug I think, we just need someone to look at it.
The only thing that isn't working properly is, that LyX
doesn't scroll the current caret position into view.
Could you expa
Hi Abdel,
thanks for the quick answer. I'll try my best to improve my bugreport.
> I just installed the latest version of LyX from the svn and tried working
> > with it on my thesis. A lot of things work great, but I wasn't able to
> > attach a label to a numbered formula. When I tell LyX to num
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I guess Uwe used Qt4.3. Just open WrapUi.ui with Designer 4.2, save it
> and commit the file.
I did this. Please try again.
Jürgen
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Qt 4.2.1, Linux:
I guess Uwe used Qt4.3. Just open WrapUi.ui with Designer 4.2, save it
and commit the file.
Abdel.
Dominik Böhm wrote:
Hello there,
I just installed the latest version of LyX from the svn and tried working
with it on my thesis. A lot of things work great, but I wasn't able to
attach a label to a numbered formula. When I tell LyX to number a particular
formula, I see (#), but trying to add a l
Qt 4.2.1, Linux:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE
-DQT_GENUINE_ST
R -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_KEYWORDS -Winvalid-pch --include=./pch.h
-I../../../src -I
../../../src/frontends -I../../../images -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/include/qt4
-I/usr/i
nclude/qt4/QtCore -I/usr/include/qt
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
There's one remaining critical bug
(#4534), but I have already uploaded a patch to bugzilla, which just needs
to be tested by one of the Windows people who can reproduce the problem.
Unfortunately, Uwe isn't able to reproduce the problem. So
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 02:18:01AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Linux, Qt 4.2.1, autotools, g++ 4.1.2:
g++ -g -O -o lyx main.o ASpell.o ISpell.o SpellBase.o Box.o Dimension.o
PrinterParams.o Thesaurus.o ./.libs/liblyxcore.a ./.libs/liblyxmathed.a
./.libs/liblyxinsets.a fr
Hello there,
I just installed the latest version of LyX from the svn and tried working
with it on my thesis. A lot of things work great, but I wasn't able to
attach a label to a numbered formula. When I tell LyX to number a particular
formula, I see (#), but trying to add a label doesn't change an
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> There's one remaining critical bug
> (#4534), but I have already uploaded a patch to bugzilla, which just needs
> to be tested by one of the Windows people who can reproduce the problem.
Unfortunately, Uwe isn't able to reproduce the problem. So here is my
proposed, un
From my POV, 1.5.4 is almost ready now. There's one remaining critical bug
(#4534), but I have already uploaded a patch to bugzilla, which just needs to
be tested by one of the Windows people who can reproduce the problem.
I propose to introduce a "soft freeze" now, i.e., only fixes of critical
hi,
> Has anyone taken into serious consideration my patch on the advanced
> search facility ? I was just needing it a few days ago, while changing my
> latest article according to some reviewers comments, but unfortunately
> I'm using the official release for such purposes.
if you are working on
> This is bug http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2556
its related but not the same. i didnt want to delete it but to change it. what
i was proposing was just to add binding the mouse button on mathed to label
dialog.
pavel
> i started work with some old document with labeled equations and want to
change
> the labels. it took me 5 mins to discover that it is a "label" and i can
change
> it through not intuitive Insert->Label
This is bug http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2556
regards Uwe
hi,
i started work with some old document with labeled equations and want to change
the labels. it took me 5 mins to discover that it is a "label" and i can change
it through not intuitive Insert->Label (thanks for your manuals Uwe).
there seems to be _no_ way how to reach the label through keybo
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> yes, you solved the puzzle. time to go for a beer (after 1.5.4 release of
> course:)
Excellent, I commit this. I think we can live with the side effect that chosen
hidden directories keep showing up.
Jürgen
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> yes, the crash disappeared. only strangeness now is that all open file
> dialog contain .lyx directory.
Apparently all hidden directories that have been selected keep showing up now,
independent from the "show hidden" state.
Jürgen
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > sorry i thought its typo. should i revert it?
>
> If you find some time (else, I'll do it on next update).
did it
pavel
> > yes, the crash disappeared. only strangeness now is that all open file
> > dialog contain .lyx directory.
>
> You mean, all crashes disappeared?
yes, you solved the puzzle. time to go for a beer (after 1.5.4 release of
course:)
pvel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> yes, the crash disappeared. only strangeness now is that all open file
> dialog contain .lyx directory.
You mean, all crashes disappeared?
Jürgen
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> sorry i thought its typo. should i revert it?
If you find some time (else, I'll do it on next update).
Jürgen
> > - the work area and in the "View Source" pane (bug 3511).
> > + the work area and in the "View Source" panel (bug 3511).
>
> Actually, I think "pane" is the more appropriate term.
sorry i thought its typo. should i revert it?
pavel
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > the crash with "up" button disappear (but empty field in "Look in" appears
> > after clicking to up button. but ok, better than crash.)
>
> better with the attached?
yes, the crash disappeared. only strangeness now is that all open file dialog
contain .lyx directory.
>
sanda wrote:
> - the work area and in the "View Source" pane (bug 3511).
> + the work area and in the "View Source" panel (bug 3511).
Actually, I think "pane" is the more appropriate term.
Jürgen
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I guess LFUN_FILE_NEW was supposed to work with the lyx server. I
> > don't know why LFUN_BUFFER_NEW is not used instead. Wait until an old
> > dev gives an opinion ;-)
>
> I guess it does not matter as long as it is possible to pass the name
> o
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> the crash with "up" button disappear (but empty field in "Look in" appears
> after clicking to up button. but ok, better than crash.)
better with the attached?
> the original crash (with the recipy in previous mails) remains though.
Hm. And this goes away if you chose "Show
> > Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > i took some time to explore qt sources and it seems that trolltech moved
> > > the part which contains any hidden-files related code of qfiledialog into
> > > private methods/classes (QFileDialogPrivate::_q_showHidden) and theres no
> > > API access to it, which is bit
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > i took some time to explore qt sources and it seems that trolltech moved
> > the part which contains any hidden-files related code of qfiledialog into
> > private methods/classes (QFileDialogPrivate::_q_showHidden) and theres no
> > API access to it, which is bit absurd sin
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess LFUN_FILE_NEW was supposed to work with the lyx server. I
> don't know why LFUN_BUFFER_NEW is not used instead. Wait until an old
> dev gives an opinion ;-)
I guess it does not matter as long as it is possible to pass the name
of the file as
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> i took some time to explore qt sources and it seems that trolltech moved
> the part which contains any hidden-files related code of qfiledialog into
> private methods/classes (QFileDialogPrivate::_q_showHidden) and theres no
> API access to it, which is bit absurd since the dia
I found this sourceforge project quite interesting and
I thought why not tell you because it could be a
shortcut for all the projects:
http://translate.sourceforge.net/wiki/start
Regards
Meeku
__
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarte
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 02:18:01AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Linux, Qt 4.2.1, autotools, g++ 4.1.2:
>
> g++ -g -O -o lyx main.o ASpell.o ISpell.o SpellBase.o Box.o Dimension.o
> PrinterParams.o Thesaurus.o ./.libs/liblyxcore.a ./.libs/liblyxmathed.a
> ./.libs/liblyxinsets.a frontends/.libs/l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> to Site.Blocklist. I'm wondering if it's ok that I remove the last line?
> (I'm worried it's too restricting).
Go ahead. I just got bored by the gui (or script) changing his user name. This
part of the IP was the only constant.
> PS. The PmWiki group now requires a pas
47 matches
Mail list logo
