On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 07:53:34AM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> > IMO this is a bug in the mail programs Bo is using.
>
> This is a feature/bug of sendmail. Considering the dominance of this
> program, I would not say it is only "Bo's mail program".
>
> > The dot mechanism should
> > be completely tra
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Then for pities sake, take this to a sendmail forum. Fix the problem not
> > the symptoms.
>
> Have you read the previous posts? This is a known feature (written in
> the standards), not bug of sendmail.
That's correct. Having read some RFCs on the subje
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:27:15PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 3. Dezember 2005 10:04 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
>
> > The 2136 patch has been revised and works for me (again :-). Waiting for
> > Georg or Helge to give it a try.
>
> It is better now, but still has problems: Multiple parag
Am Samstag, 3. Dezember 2005 10:04 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
> The 2136 patch has been revised and works for me (again :-). Waiting for
> Georg or Helge to give it a try.
It is better now, but still has problems: Multiple paragraphs are allowed
on-screen, but are printed as one paragraph. The rest
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:07:01 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 01:23:38AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
[...]
>> Alas, to my knowledge, XCmail is the only mailer with a GUI which lets me
>> open a mailbox in whatever place on disk or network it is located.
>> I hope that somed
> Then for pities sake, take this to a sendmail forum. Fix the problem not
> the symptoms.
Have you read the previous posts? This is a known feature (written in
the standards), not bug of sendmail.
> The point is: no one has ever complained about this problem here before
> in the 10 years of LyX'
Bo Peng wrote:
>> > > Take this to the developers of
>> > > XCMail or drop XCMail and use a mail client that works.
>
> I do not know other configurations and I never head of XCMail. What
> happened to me is that my .lyx files were changed by sendmail
Then for pities sake, take this to a sendmai
> > > Take this to the developers of
> > > XCMail or drop XCMail and use a mail client that works.
I do not know other configurations and I never head of XCMail. What
happened to me is that my .lyx files were changed by sendmail
(confirmed) and none of my recipients (using MS/OE, linux/mutt,
linux
On Saturday 03 December 2005 18:10, Bo Peng wrote:
> > Take this to the developers of
> > XCMail or drop XCMail and use a mail client that works.
>
> OE is also affected, if it is not causing the problem. How many lyx
> users will be left if you exclude OE users from them?
Almost all of 'em I'd ex
> Take this to the developers of
> XCMail or drop XCMail and use a mail client that works.
OE is also affected, if it is not causing the problem. How many lyx
users will be left if you exclude OE users from them?
Bo
Bo Peng wrote:
>> Several developers have told you that this isn't going to get fixed
>> before LyX 1.4 is released.
>
> I perfectly understand this.
>
>> They've explained why they think that a file format change would be a
>> bad idea at this stage.
>
> This is also fine, and I do understan
> Sendmail, TB and OE all seem innocent, as they would be given their user
> base. Or don't you think non-LyX-users would also sometimes want to send
> "dotty" files transparently?
My sendmail + OE combination has this problem. The user base of those
two are large, just that very few other files h
> Several developers have told you that this isn't going to get fixed before
> LyX 1.4 is released.
I perfectly understand this.
> They've explained why they think that a file format change would be a bad
> idea at this stage.
This is also fine, and I do understand the technical difficulties.
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 05:26:23PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Bo Peng wrote:
...
> > a) his trusty sendmail 50.2.3 that is sending a trillion email a day,
> > b) his MS/OE 10.0 that he paid $1000 for it, or
> > c) lyx 1.3.6 that opens an emailed .lyx file with problem.
> > You figure t
Bo Peng wrote:
>> This is _not_ a LyX problem, so it should not be fixed in LyX,
>> especially when the fix make the LyX code less straight-forward.
>
> I do not agree with you. Lyx is particularly vulnerable to this
> problem since every dot after an inset will be put as the first
> character of
> This is _not_ a LyX problem, so it should not be fixed in LyX,
> especially when the fix make the LyX code less straight-forward.
I do not agree with you. Lyx is particularly vulnerable to this
problem since every dot after an inset will be put as the first
character of a line. In my case, almos
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:23:56AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> 1. If there were some "make environment", by which I mean either an
>> MSVC solution file or a bunch of Makefiles that could be used to
>> invoke the MSVC compiler, then you'd find that the code compiled
>> (p
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:49:05AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> I'd like to announce the arrival of William who arrived on Tuesday 15
>> November, weighing in at 3.55kg (7lb 12oz in old money.) It wasn't
>> easy getting him out (40 hours labour followed by a Cæsarian) but
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Something seems to be wrong in the Danish provinces anyway.
> How come you have time to read mailing list and even join
> discussions?
Everyone needs a distraction from solving his own problems.
--
Angus
Hi
This is just an early warning^H^H^H^H^H^H^H blurb that I'm finally
upgrading the wiki to the new wiki engine. I've finally realised that I'm
unable to guarantee a perfectly smooth transition, so instead I'll just
plunge in and deal with any problems as they occur and get the thing over
with.
W
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:23:56AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> 1. If there were some "make environment", by which I mean either an
> MSVC solution file or a bunch of Makefiles that could be used to
> invoke the MSVC compiler, then you'd find that the code compiled
> (probably) but failed to link.
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:13:43AM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> >So a solution would be to change the format and replace "." by
> >something like \dot (like we do for \backspace). But then lyx2lyx
> >would have to be very very careful to avoid to replace \dot macro
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:49:05AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I'd like to announce the arrival of William who arrived on Tuesday 15
> November, weighing in at 3.55kg (7lb 12oz in old money.) It wasn't
> easy getting him out (40 hours labour followed by a Cæsarian) but now
> he is out both he and
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:04:58AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >> I'm sure you are already know the algorithm by now:
> >>
> >> while (age < 3 months) {
> >> If baby cries,
> >> - want milk?
> >> - change diper?
> >> - need sleep?
> >> if age > 1 month, w
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:23:36PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 2123 and 2137 are OK if tested, and it seems that 2136 needs work :)
2137 was committed.
2123 works IMHO, but Hartmut says is doesn't work. I suspect a
misunderstanding.
The 2136 patch has been revised and works for me (
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 01:23:38AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 23:21:51 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:02:21PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > From the SMTP definition (RFC-822):
> >
> > "1. Before sending a line of mail text
26 matches
Mail list logo
