On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian wrote:
> > It could be argued that the colour theme should resemble
> > that of www.lyx.org/devel.
>
> No.
Ok, I'll take that as a "no" then. ;-)
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 ht
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:58:40 +0100 Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given that the world and his dog appears to be moving not just to XML
> but to OpenDocument http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument, I
> wonder if we should consider going the whole hog when we move to XML?
>
> Seems
Dera Luis and Angus,
> Actually, this seems to be the right solution: one single file solving
> both cases. However, it doesn't seem to be anywhere on the wiki. I'll
> see if I can fix it tomorrow...
I found some info on the wiki about the tex2lyx.cmd script. To have converted
the output of th
--- Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In a nutshell, you need a lyx2lyx.bat
> > file in
> > /Resources/lyx/lyx2lyx, with a single line:
> >
> > python /lyx2lyx %1 %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8
>
> Actually, we'd have something a little more sophisticated. More like:
>
> @echo off
> if "%~1" ==
Luis Rivera wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I was wondering how could I test whether the failure of LyX-1.3.7cvs on
> Win98 was due to the Qt library rather than LyX itself. Is it there
> anything like a torture test for Qt I could grab to see if/how it
> crashes on Win98?
>
> I know this is more a Qt quest
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 22:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Also great! Could you post the exact error message please.
> Here it comes:
Good man!
> Sorry, for the late answers. I don't have too much time, but I do my best.
Please don't apologise. You're doing just great! Thank you.
Angus
Dear Luis and Angus,
>> Beware: Win98 is not %* aware; you need to state the usual set of
>> variables, like %1 %2 ... In a nutshell, you need a lyx2lyx.bat file in
>> /Resources/lyx/lyx2lyx, with a single line:
Yes, you are right. I have played with the script came with the new tex2lyx.
The old
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 20:30, Luis Rivera wrote:
> these binaries indeed work (100%, as predicted) on Win98SE [see below];
> I'm reporting failure on Win95, exclusively... sorry!
Don't worry. I want to know about the failures. I'm sure it has something to
do with the emulation of GetLongP
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 20:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/LaTeX/tex2lyx/tex2lyx_win32_27sep05_testing.zip
> package to useful. It works!
Great!
>>http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/LaTeX/tex2lyx/tex2lyx_win32_27sep05_throwing.zip
> makes those silly exceptions as Angus
Hello!
I was wondering how could I test whether the failure of LyX-1.3.7cvs on
Win98 was due to the Qt library rather than LyX itself. Is it there
anything like a torture test for Qt I could grab to see if/how it
crashes on Win98?
I know this is more a Qt question, but I'm asking this as a LyX u
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Luis,
>
> I have found the
> >
>
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/LaTeX/tex2lyx/tex2lyx_win32_27sep05_testing.zip
> package to useful. It works! The other
>
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/LaTeX/tex2lyx/tex2lyx_win32_27sep05_throwing.zip
> makes those silly exceptions a
On Sep 28, 2005, at 2:55 PM, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:39:29PM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Sep 28, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
1. Undo oddities:
(a) Cut ... paste ... undo works well for undoing the paste;
however,
undoing
Dear Luis,
I have found the
> http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/LaTeX/tex2lyx/tex2lyx_win32_27sep05_testing.zip
package to useful. It works! The other
> http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/LaTeX/tex2lyx/tex2lyx_win32_27sep05_throwing.zip
makes those silly exceptions as Angus explained.
I could not find those
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:39:29PM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> >Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> >>>1. Undo oddities:
> >>>
> >>>(a) Cut ... paste ... undo works well for undoing the paste;
> >>>however,
> >>>undoing again to undo the cut
On Sep 28, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
1. Undo oddities:
(a) Cut ... paste ... undo works well for undoing the paste;
however,
undoing again to undo the cut results in the cursor appearing in
front of the text that was restored; it should be after it
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > 1. Undo oddities:
> >
> > (a) Cut ... paste ... undo works well for undoing the paste; however,
> > undoing again to undo the cut results in the cursor appearing in
> > front of the text that was restored; it should be after it.
could you sketch a scenario? I couldn't
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:19:27AM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2005, at 10:25 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> >>"Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >
> >Martin> Slowly grasping it... perhaps you'll like the attached more.
> >Martin> Note: no change
Christian wrote:
> It could be argued that the colour theme should resemble
> that of www.lyx.org/devel.
No.
--
Angus
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:39:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Alternatively, should we really try to interpret every boolean
> Martin> that gets returned somewhere as a sign that the screen needs
> Martin> updating?
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:10:22PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > > http://wiki.lyx.org/devel/pmwiki.php/DevelFAQ/UsingPatches
> >
> > Is this your new wiki engine in action? It's looking very nice!
Thanks, although I can't take credit for the appeara
Daniel Watkins wrote:
> I'm trying to install attachment 650
> (http://bugzilla.lyx.org/attachment.cgi?id=650&action=view) as a patch,
> but am so far having no success.
The patch is too old (i.e. the code has changed too much in the meantime), so
it's not your fault.
Don't waste your time on it
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 14:24 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >From the command line:
> man patch
>
I did try to decipher it, honest. :p
>
I'm trying to install attachment 650
(http://bugzilla.lyx.org/attachment.cgi?id=650&action=view) as a patch,
but am so far having no success. I've had to switch t
On Sep 28, 2005, at 10:25 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Slowly grasping it... perhaps you'll like the attached more.
Martin> Note: no change to lyxfunc. Same functionality (I checked)
This looks much less intrusive indeed. Than
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:10:22PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > http://wiki.lyx.org/devel/pmwiki.php/DevelFAQ/UsingPatches
>
> Is this your new wiki engine in action? It's looking very nice!
I wonder if we could rewrite the URLs so we don't have to see the
(spurious) pmwiki.php
john
Christian wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> ... here's how to use "patch" in a nutshell:
> I inserted your answere here for future reference
> http://wiki.lyx.org/devel/pmwiki.php/DevelFAQ/UsingPatches
Is this your new wiki engine in action? It's looking very nice!
--
Angus
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It does not really make more sense than what we have, IMO. I propose
> to leave this code alone (I have no evidence that it is actually
> broken), apply the autoopen patch and revert andre's patch.
OK, it's in. Many thanks for being such a patient and careful reviewer
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Angus Leeming wrote:
> ... here's how to use "patch" in a nutshell:
I inserted your answere here for future reference
http://wiki.lyx.org/devel/pmwiki.php/DevelFAQ/UsingPatches
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> - remove *TOC.lyx from CVS - add Makefile.depend to CVS (not
> Georg> needed for GNU make, but might be needed for other flavours of
> Georg> make) - apply the patch
>
> Georg> Is this O
Jean-Marc,
have we decided on how best to proceed with this?
The patch does two, orthogonal things.
1. It defines LYX_ABS_TOP_SRCDIR, LYX_ABS_INSTALLED_LOCALEDIR and
LYX_ABS_INSTALLED_DATADIR in a fashion that "makes sense" on Windows
and passes these definitions to package.C through the compile
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Slowly grasping it... perhaps you'll like the attached more.
Martin> Note: no change to lyxfunc. Same functionality (I checked)
This looks much less intrusive indeed. Thanks.
Could people test this? Bennett, Helge, everyone?
J
The attached patch moves win32-specific code out of package.C and into
os_win32.[Ch]. It will also allow said code to run of older versions
of Windows when compiled with the preprocessor macros
WANT_GETLONGPATHNAME_WRAPPER and WANT_GETFILEATTRIBUTESEX_WRAPPER
defined. We haven't got there yet.
OK
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:28:33AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Alternatively, should we really try to interpret every boolean
> Martin> that gets returned somewhere as a sign that the screen needs
> Martin> updating?
I'd like to proceed in small steps to apply the fixes needed to get
things working under older versions of Windows.
Here's patch 1, to Boost.Filesystem. Beman Dawes, the libraries
author, has indicated that he's "sympathetic" to the patch:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/131958
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: That does not particularly
Juergen> disqualify my approach, no?
>> Did I write that?
Juergen> I just wanted to make clear that I got you right. Seems that
Juergen> misunderstandings scale ver
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Here is an updated patch. It fixes the problem that the TOC
Georg> files were not automatically generated for the distribution.
Georg> The Makefile now works both for srcdir=builddir and
Georg> srcdir!=builddir.
Georg> I plan to do th
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Alternatively, should we really try to interpret every boolean
Martin> that gets returned somewhere as a sign that the screen needs
Martin> updating?
Martin> See attached. Same functionality.
I realize that I am not sure of wh
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Jose' Matos wrote:
>> > Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right?
>>
>> No, it was a bit more.
>> The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following:
>> - fix wrong syntax in de_
Daniel Watkins wrote:
> I have been pointed at a couple of patch files that may possibly fix
> some problems I'm experiencing (thanks to those who pointed, sorry
> for posting the duplicates) and I've downloaded the appropriate
> files. However, I'm in the dark as to how I should apply these
> pat
I have been pointed at a couple of patch files that may possibly fix
some problems I'm experiencing (thanks to those who pointed, sorry for
posting the duplicates) and I've downloaded the appropriate files.
However, I'm in the dark as to how I should apply these patches, and
can't find any particul
Given that the world and his dog appears to be moving not just to XML
but to OpenDocument http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument, I
wonder if we should consider going the whole hog when we move to XML?
Seems like the format is rich enough to support what we need.
--
Angus
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:15:30AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> As I understand it, the idea is that if a paragraph up motion
> Martin> takes the cursor off-screen, needsUpdate should become true.
> Martin> Right?
>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> Thanks. I'm always learning ;-) So can we agree on the
> Juergen> {}-spelling and put the changes in?
>
> Yes.
Done.
Jürgen
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Alternatively, should we really try to interpret every boolean
Martin> that gets returned somewhere as a sign that the screen needs
Martin> updating?
I do not like how this is basically removing Andre's effort of
avoiding update
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 07:53, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> This document apparently has a problem with lyx2lyx. Only the beginning
> of it is loaded, and then when scrolling to the end (of what was
> loaded), LyX freezes up.
>
> This should be studied with command line lyx2lyx, I suppose. Quiet
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 14:07, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > This has to be \\space{} of course, not \\normal{}. I fixed this, but
> > nevertheless evertion of spaces to 221 fails. What's missing?
>
> I think I got it (trial and error). Please have a look (it w
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> As I understand it, the idea is that if a paragraph up motion
Martin> takes the cursor off-screen, needsUpdate should become true.
Martin> Right?
No, the value is the return value from LyXText::setCursor, which in
turn is the re
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Georg Baum wrote:
>> I tried to break it, and failed. Well done!
Juergen> Thanks. I'm always learning ;-) So can we agree on the
Juergen> {}-spelling and put the changes in?
Yes.
JMarc
Georg Baum wrote:
> I tried to break it, and failed. Well done!
Thanks. I'm always learning ;-)
So can we agree on the {}-spelling and put the changes in?
Jürgen
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I think I got it (trial and error). Please have a look (it works for all
> cases I could imagine).
I tried to break it, and failed. Well done!
Georg
Luis Rivera wrote:
> This one works fine on win98, and doesn't crash on win95; however,
> somehow it gets the path for the output file messed up: apparently, it
> printouts the current directory twice. It aborts saying:
>
> Creating file c:/LyX-1.4/C:/LyX-1.4/filename.lyx
> Could not open output
Luis Rivera wrote:
> Hope this report helps.
It does. I'll try and reproduce it here.
--
Angus
Luis Rivera wrote:
> --- Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have two new versions of the package for you to try out. See below
>> for explanations.
> Unfortunately, none of them works on win95; again, both report:
>
> Creating file C:/LyX-1.4/C:/LyX-1.4/sthondisp.lyx
> Could not op
52 matches
Mail list logo
