Am Samstag, 29. Januar 2005 16:23 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> Looks just ok to me.
>
> I take it that xpmName returns a GLib::ustring?
Yes (almost): xpmName is a GLib::ustring.
Georg
Am Samstag, 29. Januar 2005 16:24 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> btw. Are you working on making the gtk frontend complete as well?
Not at all. I use the qt frontend. I only compile all three frontends to
make sure that I don't break something by accident.
Georg
Am Freitag, 21. Januar 2005 17:14 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> Option 1, Definitely. Without question.
Here comes the patch. Because it was related, I also treated the
reproducible part of bug 922: Layout and font attributes should not be
pasted into ERT insets, we only want the plain text. I disab
Am Samstag, 29. Januar 2005 05:50 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Perhaps an alternative could be for you to temporarily increase the
rights
> of .htaccess, and when I've verified that the settings are correct you
can
> place them in the configuration file?
Unfortunately rewrite rules in .htaccess
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> | Not bool <-> int <-> pointer.
>
> Do you have explicit pointers in Java?
Of course not, just references.
> (except from
> NullPointerException. I always found this an oxymoron...)
Yes, I'd als
Basil Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Sehr geehrter Herr Baum,
"Lieber Herr Baum" would be formal enough for usenet communication :-)
I'll try to reply to your tests in a way that it is understandable for people
who
don't understand your German description.
...
> Versuch 1
> Die Datei
Am 28.01.2005 um 19:31 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:54:32PM +, Andreas Vox wrote:
...
And what is supposed to happen in the final version, when I click
on a preview? Same as enter cursor from left or right?
That's the best we can do, isn't it?
Without preview I can click di
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars,
>
| I get an undefined reference to convert for the gtk
| frontend. I fixed that by explicitly specifying the second template. Is
| this ok or do you want another solution?
This is acceptable.
btw. Are you working on making the gtk frontend comple
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The attached patch squashes two compiler warnings and disables concept
| checks for gcc 3.4 and above in the gtk frontend. The latter is mainly
| the result of a little sed script.
| Note that some files that work with concept checks enabled when compiled
Lars,
I get an undefined reference to convert for the gtk
frontend. I fixed that by explicitly specifying the second template. Is
this ok or do you want another solution?
Georg
diff -p -r -U 3 -X excl.tmp lyx-1.4-clean/src/frontends/gtk/ChangeLog lyx-1.4-cvs/src/frontends/gtk/ChangeLog
--- lyx
The attached patch squashes two compiler warnings and disables concept
checks for gcc 3.4 and above in the gtk frontend. The latter is mainly
the result of a little sed script.
Note that some files that work with concept checks enabled when compiled
with gcc 3.3.x don't work with enabled concept
Basil,
It was ok that you sent the files to the list (although one .lyx file and
one .tex file would have been enough). I don't want them privately. On
the list, they get archived and are searchable.
Am Dienstag, 25. Januar 2005 17:39 schrieb Basil Fowler:
> Versuch 1
> Die Datei »testfile1*« e
Am Freitag, 28. Januar 2005 16:54 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Anyway, I have a memory of the alignment of figures being discussed by
> Herbert among others. I think this was related to how to get "correct"
> vertical spacing around the figure. Maybe we should ask for Herbert's
> opinion here?
This is what it looks like simplifed and rewritten to use
boost.filesystem.
I have not changed the visual apparence of the dialog, so there are
one widget too many on it currently (unused).
Please comment.
Index: FormFiledialog.C
=
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 02:06:18AM +, John Levon wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 02:21:01AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>>
>> > Besides I am the only one allowed to be personally attacked in this
>> > forum.
>>
>> Oh come on, you must consi
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> - set autoBreakRows_ to true for the top-level inset. Alfredo, is that
> right?
Seems to. ;-) The fact that it has gone unnoticed implies that we have too
much top-specific code around I guess.
Alfredo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyway, I have a memory of the alignment of figures being discussed by
> Herbert among others. I think this was related to how to get "correct"
> vertical spacing around the figure. Maybe we should ask for Herbert's
> opinion here?
That was \begin{center}...\end{center}
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 06:33:44PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I thought I'd post where I've got to with OS-independent child processes.
Wouldn't it possible to have a look at the QProcess implementation?
Andre'
18 matches
Mail list logo
