On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 07:55:31AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > rename ERT into P-ERT since they are only partially red nowadays
> >
> > What? What!
> >
> > Please revert this whilst you are sober. I do not want to explain th
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 04:41:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, but if the library is not installed, rpm does not know IMO what
> package provides libqt-mt.so.3.
We don't now either given that distributions name their packages
differently.
Andre'
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:57:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> | So am I right in assuming that the whole make machinery is responsible
> >> | for the additional 100s?
> >>
> >> Dependency tracking and suck can take some time I guess.
> >
> | Re
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:58:37PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 01:09:04PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
>
> > If you click over it you get the initial dialog asking for a new custom
> > bullet. I am complayning that after adding a custom bullet the is no way
> > AFAIK to see
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > rename ERT into P-ERT since they are only partially red nowadays
>
> What? What!
>
> Please revert this whilst you are sober. I do not want to explain this
> 'improvement' to the bemused and confused on the lyx-users list.
Pleas
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 08:33:13AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
> > | So am I right in assuming that the whole make machinery is
> > | responsible for the additional 100s?
> >
> > Dependency tracking and suck can take some time I guess.
>
> Recursive make is partially to blame for that I would imagine
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| These went well:
| $ cvs update
| $ ./autogen.sh
| $ ./configure
>
| I then get this when trying to make. It is then followed by a lot of
| complaints about the now missing 'FD_aboutlyx'
You need to clean out the xforms/forms dir.
rm *.C *.h
should
On Thursday 19 August 2004 12:15, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> > Did you saw the recent changes that I made to lyx2lyx, do you have
> > any comment? I'm thinking particularly about the LyX.py module.
>
> I did notice them during cvs update, but I have had no chance to look at
> it in more detail. Just o
These went well:
$ cvs update
$ ./autogen.sh
$ ./configure
I then get this when trying to make. It is then followed by a lot of
complaints about the now missing 'FD_aboutlyx'
In file included from form_aboutlyx.C:15:
form_aboutlyx.h:18: error: parse error before `{' token
form_aboutlyx.h:21: error
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 19 August 2004 07:32, Georg Baum wrote:
>> I do however not understand why this did compile on your machine and it
>> did not on mine.
>
> Probably because I'm using qt 3.3.3 :-)
That may explain it. I have qt 3.2.1.
> Did you saw the recent changes that I m
On Thursday 19 August 2004 07:32, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> Done. I don't know much more about qt, but I have learned that often a
> toqstr()/fromqstr() is needed.
Thanks. :-)
> I do however not understand why this did compile on your machine and it
> did not on mine.
Probably because I'm using
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jose' Matos wrote:
>
>> Can you fix it if that is the solution? I know nothing about Qt.
>
| Done. I don't know much more about qt, but I have learned that often a
| toqstr()/fromqstr() is needed.
| I do however not understand why this did compile on your
Jose' Matos wrote:
> Can you fix it if that is the solution? I know nothing about Qt.
Done. I don't know much more about qt, but I have learned that often a
toqstr()/fromqstr() is needed.
I do however not understand why this did compile on your machine and it did
not on mine.
Georg
13 matches
Mail list logo
