Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I'd say we can extend this policy to lyx2lyx.
Of course I mean tex2lyx here.
Jürgen.
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Saturday 17 July 2004 03:32, Fernando Perez wrote:
> One short notice, I had gone to the ipython page (I missed the 0.6
> version, oops) and I searched for such a document, I followed the link to
> cvs and it failed from that page.
>
> For some reason the redirection
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 09:37:21PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Cleaning up my numerous lyx trees I found this.
> >
> > What where the objections again?
>
> That we're in a freeze?
FWIW, I agree. Lars, these patches may be nice but they can certainly
wait.
Obviously, I can't tell you what t
+ some other fixes. I'll break those into separate patches shortly.
? Config
? inset-1.diff
? lyxsocket-1.diff
? lyxsocket-2.diff
? lyxsocket-3.diff
? lyxsocket-4.diff
? stuff.diff
? test
? test.C
? work.diff
? src/insets/render_graphic.ii
? src/insets/render_graphic.s
? src/support/FM.C
? src/su
This patch does not compile... but it shows some stuff I worked on
some year ago...
Is it a worthy goal?
? Config
? buffer-1.diff
? work-1.diff
Index: boost/boost/shared_ptr.hpp
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/boost/b
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Cleaning up my numerous lyx trees I found this.
>>
>> What where the objections again?
>
| That we're in a freeze? I believe that the general criticism last time
| round was that you were just fiddling. Changing working c
second part of this patch
? Config
? wchar-1.diff
Index: src/paragraph.h
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/paragraph.h,v
retrieving revision 1.132
diff -u -p -r1.132 paragraph.h
--- src/paragraph.h 17 May 2004 11:28
For your pleasure.
? Config
? newfile1.lyx
? newfile1.txt
? testmsg.lyx
? work-1.diff
? lib/help
Index: src/frontends/gtk/GPainter.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends/gtk/GPainter.C,v
retrieving revision 1.
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Cleaning up my numerous lyx trees I found this.
>>
>> What where the objections again?
>
| That we're in a freeze?
That is new objections.
| I believe that the general criticism last time
| round was that you were just
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Cleaning up my numerous lyx trees I found this.
>
> What where the objections again?
That we're in a freeze? I believe that the general criticism last time
round was that you were just fiddling. Changing working code for the sake
of it. That the new code is neither b
Cleaning up my numerous lyx trees I found this.
What where the objections again?
? BranchList_C.diff
? Config
? err.diff
? iter-1.diff
? iterator-2.diff
? iterator-3.diff
? iterator-4.diff
? iterator-5.diff
? iterator-6.diff
? iterator-7.diff
? iterator.diff
? iters.diff
? lib/help
Index: src/Me
Georg Baum wrote:
> jurabib is a bit more difficult: It has a switch "natoptargorder" that
> reverses the argument order for the \cite command. The problem is that this
> switch can be given as global or jurabib option or in the \jurabibsetup
> conmmand. I'll think about that.
As of version 0.6, n
On Thursday 22 July 2004 16:48, Georg Baum wrote:
> Recoding parts of tex2lyx in lyx2lyx is IMHO not the way to go.
I completly agree.
--
José Abílio
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Could you also add jurabib? Basically, you just have to check for
> \usepackage{jurabib} instead of \usepackage{natbib}. The supported
> citation commands are exactly the same, except that jurabib also has
> \cite[before][after]{foo}
> and that jurabib does not know "
On Saturday 17 July 2004 03:32, Fernando Perez wrote:
> >
> > You mean that you the guy of Ipython (which btw I use, thanks for a
> > really usefull project) wrote a perl script for lyx. OK, I lost one
> > more idol. ;-)
>
> Easy there, I haven't written a line of perl since 2001. So cut me some
15 matches
Mail list logo
