Re: LyX 1.4.0cvs packages

2004-05-19 Thread Ling Li
Ling Li wrote: Forgot to mention: Currently I "--disable-debug --disable-assertions" in making the 1.4.0cvs packages. If I remember correctly (since I disabled them long time ago), the reason to --disable-debug is that the package size is way too big with debug info, and the reason to --disable-ass

Re: DocBook Export - substitute "programlisting" with "screen"

2004-05-19 Thread Chris Karakas
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 19.05.04 19:08:14: > > > something I don't know. But if you enable such features, they should be > > "on a case basis", i.e. the user should have the possibility to enable > > line numbering here, disable it there, enable it a few pages further down >

Re: DocBook Export - substitute "programlisting" with "screen"

2004-05-19 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 17:10, Chris Karakas wrote: > "Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 19.05.04 16:32:17: > > would it be different if we pass the attribute linenumbering, this is > > something like: > > > > > > ... > > > > I did this with a quick hack in my sed script and Openjade

Re: [patch] fixed version of gbrief2.layout

2004-05-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Uwe> Dear developers, I had some problems with the gbrief2.layout, Uwe> which is in the CVS folder /lib/layouts/. To fix them, I changed Uwe> the following: Uwe> - If one uses ERT, the 'letter'-environment is always used. Uwe> Because this is t

Re: [patch] corrected file de_math.bind

2004-05-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Uwe> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I will apply it. Could you do the same for the 1.3.x branch? Uwe> You could apply this to the 1.3.x branch without changes, because Uwe> I simply changed the math.bind that comes with LyX 1.3.3. Thanks, I di

Re: DocBook Export - substitute "programlisting" with "screen"

2004-05-19 Thread Chris Karakas
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 19.05.04 16:32:17: > > would it be different if we pass the attribute linenumbering, this is > something like: > > > ... > > I did this with a quick hack in my sed script and Openjade did not complain at all. If this is used in SGML standard st

doxygen warnings

2004-05-19 Thread Angus Leeming
I just tried to run doxygen, but stopped when is complained: doxygen ./Doxyfile Warning: Tag `CGI_NAME' at line 894 of file ./Doxyfile has become obsolete. To avoid this warning please update your configuration file using "doxygen -u" Warning: Tag `CGI_URL' at line 900 of file ./Doxyfile has becom

Re: LyX and Qt-Mac

2004-05-19 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> Having just read README.MacOSX, I went and looked at > Angus> the patch that we must apply to the Qt sources > Angus> patch lyx on this platform. > Angus> There are two changes that must be made. The first > Angus> one looks like a simple oversight on Qt's part

Re: LyX and Qt-Mac

2004-05-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Having just read README.MacOSX, I went and looked at the patch Angus> that we must apply to the Qt sources in order to build lyx on Angus> this platform. Angus> There are two changes that must be made. The first one looks Angus> li

[patch] namespace lyx::frontend

2004-05-19 Thread Angus Leeming
The 9 line patch to the Qt/Mac sources, below, needed to compile LyX on MacOSX is rendered unnecessary by the attached 13833 line patch to LyX ;-) The patch wraps all of the dialog code inside namespace lyx::frontend and goes someway towards wrapping the rest of the frontend code inside the same n

Re: DocBook Export - substitute "programlisting" with "screen"

2004-05-19 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 21:21, Chris Karakas wrote: > Hello, > > I think this is an easy one: Indeed. > I propose to substitute > > > ... > > > with: > > > ... > > > in the DocBook SGML exported document. This does not seem to be crucial > - I could not reproduce any error in Openjade that

Re: Portable python question.

2004-05-19 Thread Angus Leeming
Jose' Matos wrote: >> > This can be done earlier in the candidates stage, but you get >> > the >> > idea. :-) >> >> Sorry, I don't follow. > > Conceptually is the program name that is different, so this > functions does > not need to changed if you replace only the candidate list depending

Re: Portable python question.

2004-05-19 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 10:00, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > This can be done earlier in the candidates stage, but you get the > > idea. :-) > > Sorry, I don't follow. Conceptually is the program name that is different, so this functions does not need to changed if you replace only the candidat

Re: Portable python question.

2004-05-19 Thread Angus Leeming
Jose' Matos wrote: > Roughly the code should look like this: > if os.name == "nt": > full_path = os.path.join(directory, prog + ".exe") > else: > full_path = os.path.join(directory, prog) Thank you. > This can be done earlier in the candidates stage, but you get the > idea. :-) Sorry, I don't

Re: Portable python question.

2004-05-19 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 09:05, Angus Leeming wrote: > Jose, > > def find_exe(candidates, path): > for prog in candidates: > for directory in path: > - full_path = os.path.join(directory, prog) > + full_path = os.path.join(directory, prog

Portable python question.

2004-05-19 Thread Angus Leeming
Jose, I've been getting Paul Rubin to test a python version of the "instant preview for lyx 1.3.x" script. Win32 users currently don't have access to this eye candy, mainly because so many unix utilities need to be installed first and, crucially, all these utilities need to work. Amazing how m