Re: Naming of layouts - numbered/unnumbered

2004-01-20 Thread John Weiss
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 06:08:07PM -0500, Kuba Ober wrote: > The dropdown box will become cluttered if suddently its width will almost > doubled due to (Numbered) or (Unnumbered) being appended to header styles. I must agree. Get rid of the old "*" TeX-ism; it's certainly too cryptic. However,

Quote Misfeature

2004-01-20 Thread John Weiss
While recently writing a quote-in-a-quote, I went to change my quotation style from double-quotes to single quotes. To my horror, the old, venerable "Quotes Layout" dialog was gone, replaced by a document-wide setting. This is a Misfeature in most European languages. In English, German, and (I t

Re: Most wanted feature: Spell as you type

2004-01-20 Thread John Weiss
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:01:58PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > The error in this sentence wouldn't be found by *any* spell checker, > on-the-fly or not :-) > > I am not sure really how practically useful this feature would be -- > seems more like a look-good feel-good thing to me. I have ha

Current CVS lyx: selection does not work

2004-01-20 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
You can not select text in the current CVS lyx. Neither hold-left-mouse and drag nor they keyboard method (shift+arrow keys) work. Best regards, ---Kayvan -- Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids: Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella

Re: [patch] more IU

2004-01-20 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:20:52PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Do whatever is easiest for you. Note that Alfredo is pretty good at > tracking down off by one errors. (You've already warned people not to > use current cvs for real work.) *grin* As 'cvs commit' on A and 'cvs up' on B is simpler

Re: [patch] more IU

2004-01-20 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: >> What's the current_ slice? I thought that the cursor (blinking >> thing) was always the top-most slice. > > We are dispatching to the innermost inset willing to handle an LFUN. > This means going down the slice stack. Of course we can't just pop > slices while trying to dis

Re: [patch] more IU

2004-01-20 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:05:56PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote: > > Why does LCursor::innerInsetTabular() exist? Shouldn't this be a > > wrapper function in an anonymous namespace in insettabular.C? > > Possibly, yes. In fact 'innerInsetOfType' should be sufficient at some point of time. Andre'

Re: [patch] more IU

2004-01-20 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:43:39PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > > This reduces the mathcursor class to a namespace and moves some > > stuff to LCursor and InsetBase. > > > > There are still 2500 lines to move (1400 from amthcursor and 900 > > from formulabase) and i

Re: [patch] more IU

2004-01-20 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > This reduces the mathcursor class to a namespace and moves some > stuff to LCursor and InsetBase. > > There are still 2500 lines to move (1400 from amthcursor and 900 > from formulabase) and it is still full of 'off-by-one' crashes but > things are snapping into place. >

Re: Why buffer->niceFile()?

2004-01-20 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 19 January 2004 9:11 pm, Georg Baum wrote: > > To come back to the original question: Can we remove buffer::niceFile()? > Yes. I suggest to follow Andrés suggestion and move it to LaTeXFeatures > (see attached). While this does not change functionality, it makes the > code better understa

Re: Cannot commit?

2004-01-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Let me do it. I saw your message last week, but didn't act on Lars> it. I should have. OK. Lars> Ok, so it was added with this set. (I'll have a look at it) Thanks. JMarc