On Friday 28 November 2003 21:31, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> do not use cursors when not needed, rewrite loops in a more standard
> way, and do not abuse parOffset calculations (inside loops).
> All semi-automatic (it can containg bugs as always, though)
> I'm leaving in a few hours, so I will not
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> There are, indeed, still row cache related parts 'in' the LyXText, so
> LyXText is not (yet) the 'ParagraphList data & method' kind of class I'd
> like to have in the end.
>
> [The 'elements' are, of course, Paragraphs::rows itself, and a few
> bits and pieces all over the
do not use cursors when not needed, rewrite loops in a more standard way,
and do not abuse parOffset calculations (inside loops).
All semi-automatic (it can containg bugs as always, though)
I'm leaving in a few hours, so I will not apply this by myself. (I'll look again at it
on
monday or so)
Angus Leeming wrote:
> 5. Qt: I got rid of the VSpace stuff from the Paragraph dialog but have not
> written QVSpace.
Done (patch attached). If noone objects, I'll commit this tomorrow.
BTW:
- is there any special reason why you have removed "keep" (i.e. \vspace*) in
the xforms dialog? I have re
On Friday 28 November 2003 19:44, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > Until this moment you added:
> >
> > * emphasis
> > * noun
> > * ...
>
> Emph and Noun are only for LaTeX. For linuxdoc you just have to look
> up the syntax from the DTD, and implement what can be readily
> implemented a
Martin Vermeer wrote:
The changes look pretty harmless, don't they? (In particular in
comparison with Andre's patches :-))
Please apply. Could you also have a look at my second email?
Michael
It's in. (And yes, everything that worked before still appears to work.)
Could you please also check
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:04:15PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 10:51, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > > I will adapt the linuxdoc code to the new scheme.
> >
> > Great! Make sure the output does't change.
>
> As long as it is whitespace that has no meaning. :-)
Dear John, dear Andre,
I'm writing my PhD Thesis using Lyx. Sometimes I would like to read quickly
throung the last paragraphs. On the other hand I have to fill in footnotes
all the time. So closing all the footnotes manually just to get a better view
of the text is a bit complicated.
I believ
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 06:32:32PM +0100, Michael Schmitt spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > If everything still works after this, I am happy with it...
>
> The changes look pretty harmless, don't they? (In particular in
> comparison with Andre's patches :-))
>
> Please apply. Could
Finally!
I fixed it. Of course, the value of LC_XXX must be exported... Silly me.
Please check and apply the patch (for HEAD and 1.3.X branch)
Michael
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/po/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revis
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:44:00PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 18:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Modified files:
> > lyx-devel/lib/: ChangeLog
> > lyx-devel/lib/ui/: stdmenus.ui
> > lyx-devel/po/: POTFILES.in
> > lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/: Chan
Start LyX
New Doc
type some crap
File->Close
'Discard'
...
crash
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
Buffer::text() const (this=0x0) at ../../boost/boost/scoped_ptr.hpp:95
95 BOOST_ASSERT(ptr != 0);
(gdb) where
#0 Buffer::text() const (this=0x0) at
../../boost/boos
On Friday 28 November 2003 5:44 pm, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 18:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Modified files:
> > lyx-devel/lib/: ChangeLog
> > lyx-devel/lib/ui/: stdmenus.ui
> > lyx-devel/po/: POTFILES.in
> > lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/: ChangeLog Form
On Friday 28 November 2003 18:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Modified files:
> lyx-devel/lib/: ChangeLog
> lyx-devel/lib/ui/: stdmenus.ui
> lyx-devel/po/: POTFILES.in
> lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/: ChangeLog FormVSpace.C
> lyx-devel/src/insets/: ChangeLog insetvs
Martin Vermeer wrote:
If everything still works after this, I am happy with it...
The changes look pretty harmless, don't they? (In particular in
comparison with Andre's patches :-))
Please apply. Could you also have a look at my second email?
Michael
Step 2. Almost mechanical.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Index: BufferView.C
===
RCS file: /usr
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:48:26PM +0100, Michael Schmitt spake thusly:
> >>I changed a couple of messages (mainly concerning the Box dialog) to
> >>"harmonize" the dialogs. Could you please check and apply the patch?
> >>Thanks in advance.
> >
> > I like these short patches... don't consume u
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I changed a couple of messages (mainly concerning the Box dialog) to
"harmonize" the dialogs. Could you please check and apply the patch?
Thanks in advance.
I like these short patches... don't consume unnecessary bandwidth.
Oh, I forgot the attachment! Here it comes...
Mic
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:39:20PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:38:41PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > I, for my part, prefer the 'closed' situation for working as this
> > lets me jump around in the document quickly.
>
> Sorry can you explain further ? Is this because
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:38:41PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I, for my part, prefer the 'closed' situation for working as this
> lets me jump around in the document quickly.
Sorry can you explain further ? Is this because footnotes appear inline
and make the text formatting weird (huge line h
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:30:59PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > Because other people have other preferences and want to see them all?
>
> This is what I want to find out: why people have these preferences.
I see.
I, for my part, prefer the 'closed' situation for working as this
lets me jump arou
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > Yet, the feature that I am missing in Lyx is a switch, either a menu entry or
> > > a button to open/close all footnotes at once. This feature was available in
> >
> > Why do you want to be able to open or close all the footno
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:07:08AM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 05:12:40PM +0100, Markus B. wrote:
>
> > Yet, the feature that I am missing in Lyx is a switch, either a menu entry or
> > a button to open/close all footnotes at once. This feature was available in
>
> Why do
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:33:53PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >
> > [We had discussed this already once, but as this is 'fundamental' I
> > thought we'd better agree explicitly on it ;-)]
> >
> > This replaces the LyXText 'semi member' of BufferView by a real
> > LyXT
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:23:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 1:12 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > There, I didn't think that it should be so hard.
>
> I forgot to 'cvs add' the new files. This patch has everything.
Could you please commit the Qt parts yourself?
Andre'
On Friday 28 November 2003 10:51, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > I will adapt the linuxdoc code to the new scheme.
>
> Great! Make sure the output does't change.
As long as it is whitespace that has no meaning. :-)
I intend to add also Character Styles to linuxdoc.
If we could agree on some k
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 03:27:56PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 3:25 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > I question the utility of this feature.
>
> That's not really relevant to the original discussion.
Now why should we break tradition?
Andre'
On Friday 28 November 2003 12:41, Helge Hafting wrote:
> > ...and yes, I think (agree?) that character attributes
> > (size/bold/italic/...) ought to die off... but we cannot just remove
> > them, as they are in old docs. Discourage their use ("finger
> > painting") together with providing logical
On Friday 28 November 2003 3:25 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I question the utility of this feature.
That's not really relevant to the original discussion. Alfredo was trying to
ascertain what the existing code was trying to do.
> General marks _are_ useful, but in LyX I'd probably implement them
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc, wouldn't this: stamp-forms: lyx_forms.h-tmp if cmp
Angus> -s $< lyx_forms.h ; then \ : ;\ else \ rm -f lyx_forms.h ;\ cp
Angus> $< lyx_forms.h ;\ fi echo timestamp > $@
Angus> be better as this: stamp-forms: lyx_forms.h-
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 12:12:13PM +0100, Michael Schmitt spake thusly:
> Dear Martin and Angus,
>
> I changed a couple of messages (mainly concerning the Box dialog) to
> "harmonize" the dialogs. Could you please check and apply the patch?
> Thanks in advance.
I like these short patches... d
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 03:12:28PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 3:04 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > Copy the buffer from the 'set-mark' point to the current cursor
> > > position. (M-w in emacs shortcut notation.)
> >
> > Is there just a single one of these buffers?
>
>
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> convertDefault.sh will report failure when invoked on Win32
Angus> with files with absolute paths. This patch fixes the problem.
Angus> -FILE=`echo $2 | cut -d ':' -f 2` +# Note that Win32 filenames
Angus> have the form 'C:\my\file
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 11:18:50AM +0100, Michael Schmitt spake thusly:
> Hi Martin and Angus,
>
> when doing the German translations, I noticed that I have to translate
> the same messages (with slight variations) again and again.
>
> Could you please have a look at the attachment and at the
On Friday 28 November 2003 3:04 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Copy the buffer from the 'set-mark' point to the current cursor
> > position. (M-w in emacs shortcut notation.)
>
> Is there just a single one of these buffers?
It appears so, yes. At least trying to set the mark in two views of the same
> Do we still have two hours roundtrip time on this list?
Actually 2 1/2 hours this time...
Alfredo
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 02:44:50PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 1:46 pm, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > On Friday 28 November 2003 14:37, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Is this like emacs' 'mark'? Ie, we 'mark' the start of the
> > > selection buffer. Angus (being thick and l
> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Christian> The problem mainly seems to lie with the UI: - John didn't
Christian> like adding menu alternatives for this because it would
Christian> clutter the menus. (i.e. one alternative for "Open all
Christian> floats", one
On Friday 28 November 2003 15:44, Angus Leeming wrote:
> [...]to copy all text from the current cursor position to the end of the
> document.
Indeed, I think it can be the case (it seems to be more or less coherent with how it
is used in the code).
Thanks for the explanation.
Alfredo
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 10:38:04AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Jose' Matos wrote:
...
> >> An in-between kludge at this point could be to test for
> >> linuxdoc/docbook at line 227 of output_docbook.C and call either
> >> simpleDocBookOnePar() or simpleLinuxDocOnePar(). Of course afte
On Friday 28 November 2003 1:46 pm, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 14:37, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Is this like emacs' 'mark'? Ie, we 'mark' the start of the selection
> > buffer. Angus (being thick and lazy)
>
> Possibly. What's good for, in emacs? How does it work?
Some t
On Friday 28 November 2003 14:37, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Is this like emacs' 'mark'? Ie, we 'mark' the start of the selection
> buffer. Angus (being thick and lazy)
Possibly. What's good for, in emacs? How does it work?
> ps, could you cc lyx-devel when mailing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The message
>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 05:12:40PM +0100, Markus B. wrote:
> Yet, the feature that I am missing in Lyx is a switch, either a menu entry or
> a button to open/close all footnotes at once. This feature was available in
Why do you want to be able to open or close all the footnotes at once ?
john
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> [We had discussed this already once, but as this is 'fundamental' I
> thought we'd better agree explicitly on it ;-)]
>
> This replaces the LyXText 'semi member' of BufferView by a real
> LyXText member of Buffer.
[snip...]
> Comments?
This (below) seems fundamentally
Michael Schmitt wrote:
Hi, Michael.
> I changed a couple of messages (mainly concerning the Box dialog) to
> "harmonize" the dialogs. Could you please check and apply the patch?
> Thanks in advance.
Patch please...
--
Angus
On Friday 28 November 2003 1:12 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> There, I didn't think that it should be so hard.
I forgot to 'cvs add' the new files. This patch has everything.
Angus
vspace.diff.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:12:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> There, I didn't think that it should be so hard.
Well, it was for me. Thank you.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Fr
There, I didn't think that it should be so hard.
Things I've changed:
1. stdmenus.ui now dispatches "dialog-show-new-inset vspace" rather than
"insert-vspace". LFUN_INSERT_VSPACE no longer exists.
Rationale: when I insert a vspace from the menu, I want the dialog to pop up
so that I can specify
Jean-Marc, wouldn't this:
stamp-forms: lyx_forms.h-tmp
if cmp -s $< lyx_forms.h ; then \
: ;\
else \
rm -f lyx_forms.h ;\
cp $< lyx_forms.h ;\
fi
echo timestamp > $@
be better as this:
stamp-forms: lyx_forms.h-tmp
Do we still have two hours roundtrip time on this list?
Andre'
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:46:11AM +0100, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
I would not trust in an eternal existence of different implementations
of 'logical' and 'physical' markup... Even if there is a theoretic
difference I can't see a technical reason requiring two implementati
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Not the look of the main screen looks like something is hidden at the
>> right side all the time... not looking good at all.
>>
>> Can it be put back again please.
>
| Done.
Thanks.
--
Lgb
Dear Martin and Angus,
I changed a couple of messages (mainly concerning the Box dialog) to
"harmonize" the dialogs. Could you please check and apply the patch?
Thanks in advance.
Could you please also have a look at the Box dialog (I don't use xforms)
and check that colons are used consistent
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 08:08:03AM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> On Thursday 27 November 2003 18:51, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > ...and remember, in these charstyle insets, like in ERT, there is no
> > possibility to internally change char attributes anyway...
>
> I like it. :-)
> Cou
[We had discussed this already once, but as this is 'fundamental' I
thought we'd better agree explicitly on it ;-)]
This replaces the LyXText 'semi member' of BufferView by a real LyXText
member of Buffer.
The benefit in the long run is, of course, simpler architecture.
Immediately we would gain
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2003 20:18, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>>
>> In principle. Doing so now would break all insets that are
>> different for linuxdoc and docbook (and that's most of them!)
>>
>> An in-between kludge at this point could be to test for
>> linuxdoc/docbook at lin
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 08:03:02AM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2003 20:18, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > In principle. Doing so now would break all insets that are different
> > for linuxdoc and docbook (and that's most of them!)
> >
> > An in-between kludge at this
> Does anybody have production documents containing CharStyles already?
>
> If not, I'll just check this in later today/tomorrow.
i
Committed.
- Martin
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Martin and Angus,
when doing the German translations, I noticed that I have to translate
the same messages (with slight variations) again and again.
Could you please have a look at the attachment and at the code
concerning the box insert? It feels like there is a lot of redundancy in
the co
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Markus B. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using Klyx for a long time and I appreciate it very much.
>
> Yet, the feature that I am missing in Lyx is a switch, either a menu entry or
> a button to open/close all footnotes at once. This feature was available in
> Klyx. Actual
Hello everybody,
I found a couple of new bugs in LyX 1.4. Simple test case descriptions
are attached. Unless I hear from you, I will add them to bugzilla in the
evening.
Have a nice day,
Michael
-- 1 --
Open new doc; enter "a", CTRL-M, "{"; click in front of "a"
=> the red math box does not
convertDefault.sh will report failure when invoked on Win32 with files
with absolute paths. This patch fixes the problem.
-FILE=`echo $2 | cut -d ':' -f 2`
+# Note that Win32 filenames have the form 'C:\my\file',
+# so use everything from the first ':' to the end of the line.
+FILE=`echo $2 | cut
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:46:11AM +0100, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:52:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > No... underline/underbar is much more releted to size/bold/italic etc.
> > It is not a logical style, and that is what I belive charstyles should
> > be.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:22:29PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Ok, who removed the right margin?
I did when straightening out the 'overlapping insets' 'feature' and
seemingly forgot to re-add it in the end.
> Not the look of the main screen looks like something is hidden at the
> right
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 08:48:07PM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> When I enter "^" in math mode (or use the power button in the math
> panel), I see a "^" and not the box slightly up and to the right that
> I expect.
Funny. I can confirm this.
Maybe a result if the dispatch order
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 05:12:40PM +0100, Markus B. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using Klyx for a long time and I appreciate it very much.
>
> Yet, the feature that I am missing in Lyx is a switch, either a menu entry or
> a button to open/close all footnotes at once. This feature was availabl
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:52:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> No... underline/underbar is much more releted to size/bold/italic etc.
> It is not a logical style, and that is what I belive charstyles should
> be.
I would not trust in an eternal existence of different implementations
of 'lo
This changes public BufferView::text into a private BufferView::text_
and removes a bit of unused code from the insets (insetInInsetY,
InsetText::textwidth_/cpos/cpar/crow)
Should be uncontroversial.
Andre'
? .lyxlayout.C.swp
? 0.diff
? 1.diff
? 2.diff
? frontends/controllers/ControlVSpace.C
? f
On Thursday 27 November 2003 18:51, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> ...and remember, in these charstyle insets, like in ERT, there is no
> possibility to internally change char attributes anyway...
I like it. :-)
Could not this work apply to index either as the users are asking this in
the users ma
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 20:18, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> In principle. Doing so now would break all insets that are different
> for linuxdoc and docbook (and that's most of them!)
>
> An in-between kludge at this point could be to test for
> linuxdoc/docbook at line 227 of output_docbook.C an
70 matches
Mail list logo
