Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Andre uses 0.89; I use CVS.
> Indeed, both should not be used for 1.4 CVS design.but I like to
> be able to resize the tabbed-dialogs!
>
Well, I use 1.02, and do not seem to have any problems resizing tabbed
dialogs. It is apparently unlikely that anything less than 1.0 w
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>
>>Is this a bug in Xforms perhaps? What Xforms version do you have?
>>I myself use CVS/Xforms.
>>
>
> Get real Rob!
> It's fine to test a CVS version of a required pkg to check new
> features/bugs, but designing with it is begging for problems.
I t
The new QNote dialog (and a credits update).
Regards,
Juergen.
/**
* \file QNote.C
* This file is part of LyX, the document processor.
* Licence details can be found in the file COPYING.
*
* \author Juergen Spitzmueller
*
* Full author contact details are available in file CREDITS
*/
#inc
> Ad. the glade files:
>
> I think those should be placed in the gtk directory, but be installed
> in the lib dir.
I think that is the right way, and I have done that.
Huang Ying.
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Is this a bug in Xforms perhaps? What Xforms version do you have?
> I myself use CVS/Xforms.
>
Get real Rob!
It's fine to test a CVS version of a required pkg to check new
features/bugs, but designing with it is begging for problems. If you
insist on doing this, then please ma
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:20:58PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
>
> Yup, I have version 2.57 installed. I've previously done an apt-get
> dselect-upgrade, so (hopefully) have updated everything.
You need to remove the autoconf2.13 package (otherwise autoconf 2.13 will be
used and not 2.57).
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 04:46:46PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> If you needed latex-ttf-fonts, then uninstall it, and install
>>
>> http://movementarian.org/latex-xft-fonts-0.1.tar.gz
John> JMarc, I would like to start using this for 1.
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 04:10:12PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote: We have to use Qt's translation system for these. We also
John> have to do that for the file dialog to be translated, btw
>> And is there a way to trick Qt's tr
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 04:46:46PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> If you needed latex-ttf-fonts, then uninstall it, and install
>
> http://movementarian.org/latex-xft-fonts-0.1.tar.gz
JMarc, I would like to start using this for 1.3.3. Can we make the RPMs
depend on it ?
regards
john
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 04:10:12PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> We have to use Qt's translation system for these. We also have
> John> to do that for the file dialog to be translated, btw
>
> And is there a way to trick Qt's translator to use gettext? A special
> QTranslator subclas
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:11:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote: Big Boo to Trolltech on this one.
>> Indeed. The current code in Ron's binary works around the problem
>> reasonably, except for one big point: it does not work
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:52:45PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> And the possiblity to put such an pagebreak inset in a
> Andre> minipage, i.e. some addition to LyXFunc::getStatus I suppose.
>
> It is rather the job of I
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> And the possiblity to put such an pagebreak inset in a
Andre> minipage, i.e. some addition to LyXFunc::getStatus I suppose.
It is rather the job of Inset::insetAllowed.
JMarc
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:11:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> Big Boo to Trolltech on this one.
>
> Indeed. The current code in Ron's binary works around the problem
> reasonably, except for one big point: it does not work when the
> interface has been l10n, since we pass to Qt so
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:06:57PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Big Boo to Trolltech on this one.
>
> We can't do much about it, can we?
Jean-Marc had a hack around I think
> | > In practice, no. It seems to work on all applications we've tested (or
> | > had reports from).
>
> So they have
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:11:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> So there you have it. They not only don't agree it's a
> John> disgusting, unpleasant hack, they won't even let us turn it off.
>
> This answer is rather discou
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> So there you have it. They not only don't agree it's a
John> disgusting, unpleasant hack, they won't even let us turn it off.
This answer is rather discouraging.
John> Big Boo to Trolltech on this one.
Indeed. The current code in Ron'
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:32:09PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> So there you have it. They not only don't agree it's a disgusting,
> unpleasant hack, they won't even let us turn it off.
>
> Big Boo to Trolltech on this one.
We can't do much about it, can we?
---
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 02:59:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Isn't there an Implicit Oath of Quality ?
>
> As these keyhole dialogs are not usable for me I don't
> consider them good quality...
That wasn't the question I asked ;) In fact I was being quite iofftopic
...
john
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:01:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> But before you do this, please have a look at the insettext patch
> (or equivalently BRANCH_NOUPDATE).
OK I'll check out BRANCH_NOUPDATE now
john
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > What other cosmetic issues ?
>
> The cursor position 'on' the inset when going down. But that's the same
Hmm that sounds less than ideal, but ...
regards
john
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:43:30PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> I can do this, don't worry about it
But before you do this, please have a look at the insettext patch
(or equivalently BRANCH_NOUPDATE).
This is much more important.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Secu
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:47:49PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:53:26PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > How sweet! As an opensource key developper of LyX, I would expect you
> > > to care for things beyond.
> >
> > Why? Can't remember swearing a Big Oath of Altru
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:43:30PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:27:59AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > ... after I've fixed some of the cosmetic issues or at least disabled
> > insertion of this inset in a minipage and somebody has removed the
>
> What other cosmetic i
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:53:26PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > How sweet! As an opensource key developper of LyX, I would expect you
> > to care for things beyond.
>
> Why? Can't remember swearing a Big Oath of Altruism...
Isn't there an Implicit Oath of Quality ?
regars
john
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:27:59AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> ... after I've fixed some of the cosmetic issues or at least disabled
> insertion of this inset in a minipage and somebody has removed the
What other cosmetic issues ?
> pagebreak toggles from the paragraph dialog(s)...
I can do t
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:31:27AM +0200, Asger Kunuk Alstrup wrote:
> Unless we can obtain a license to redistribute a (possibly tainted) Qt DLL
> from Trolltech.
That's true; I can't see them being ecstatic about it though
regards
john
So there you have it. They not only don't agree it's a disgusting,
unpleasant hack, they won't even let us turn it off.
Big Boo to Trolltech on this one.
john
--- Begin Message ---
On Tuesday, 08. Jul 2003 12:40 John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:30:13AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 02:00:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | 0.89.6
>
> Lars> Is that supported?
>
> Only in 1.3.x.
Bug is present in 1.3.3cvs.
Andre'
--
Those w
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Please commit this.
Let me do some testing first.
Regards, Alfredo
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:58:42PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 08:28:11PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> | > Hmmm, I open the dialog; indeed, when I start typing immediately it goes
> | > straight into the Reference field.
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 0.89.6
Lars> Is that supported?
Only in 1.3.x.
JMarc
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 08:28:11PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
| > Hmmm, I open the dialog; indeed, when I start typing immediately it goes
| > straight into the Reference field. At the first char, the buttons get
| > immediately activated!
| >
| > Is this
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:34:44PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
> > That's not the proper patch to the real problem: how do we eliminate the
> > blocking of reducing the initial size of an Xforms dialog?!?!
>
> IIRC the blocking was introduced in LyX to avoid a crash (bu
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 08:28:11PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Hmmm, I open the dialog; indeed, when I start typing immediately it goes
> straight into the Reference field. At the first char, the buttons get
> immediately activated!
>
> Is this a bug in Xforms perhaps? What Xforms version do you ha
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> That's not the proper patch to the real problem: how do we eliminate the
> blocking of reducing the initial size of an Xforms dialog?!?!
IIRC the blocking was introduced in LyX to avoid a crash (bug) in
xforms-0.89 (?) when reducing the size. But please someone confirm that.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 08:00:11PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>>Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>
>>>xforms:
>>>
>>>
>>>1. If I open the reference dialog on an existing reference and modify
>>>the 'Reference' field manually, the Ok and Apply buttons stay disabled.
>>
>>I don't see th
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| the idea is to get rid of view-related back pointers in buffer, and make it
| act as a mere backend as it should.
This looks very nice.
Please commit this.
--
Lgb
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 08:00:11PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > xforms:
> >
> >
> > 1. If I open the reference dialog on an existing reference and modify
> > the 'Reference' field manually, the Ok and Apply buttons stay disabled.
>
> I don't see that. Whenever I change som
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> xforms:
>
>
> 1. If I open the reference dialog on an existing reference and modify
> the 'Reference' field manually, the Ok and Apply buttons stay disabled.
I don't see that. Whenever I change something in the dialog, the
OK/Apply buttons get activated!
> 2. I am not su
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:44:05PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:26:37PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> >> Yes, but it's virtual from insetbase (returns 0 there) add I wanted to be
> >> sure not to miss any call
> >
> > Ok. Good excus
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:26:37PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> Yes, but it's virtual from insetbase (returns 0 there) add I wanted to be
>> sure not to miss any call
>
> Ok. Good excuse ;-)
Actually, is there a way to detect if a method get linked when it's virtual
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:26:37PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Yes, but it's virtual from insetbase (returns 0 there) add I wanted to be
> sure not to miss any call
Ok. Good excuse ;-)
> (probably the one from insetbase should be removed also)
Maybe in the end. Seems to be used by the pre
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> BufferView * InsetTabular::view() const
> {
> - return buffer_->getUser();
> + Assert(false);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> Doesn't that mean that function should be removed altogether?
>
> Andre'
>
Yes, but it's virtual from insetbase (returns 0 there) add
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:10:05PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> It also cleans up the VC code a little IMHO.
>
> BufferView_pimpl.C| 15 +--
> BufferView_pimpl.h|4 ++
> buffer.C | 67
> +-
> buffer.h
xforms:
1. If I open the reference dialog on an existing reference and modify
the 'Reference' field manually, the Ok and Apply buttons stay disabled.
They get only enabled if I click around in the (FAR TOO SHORT!) listbox.
This is really annoying.
Could we please drop this 'cleverness' of guess
the idea is to get rid of view-related back pointers in buffer, and make it
act as a mere backend as it should.
I suppose the patch can be syntetized in say:
|RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/buffer.C,v
|retrieving revision 1.491
|diff -u -p -u -r1.491 buffer.C
|--- buffer.C 7 Jul
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> LyX says that xforms is missing (which is right but
Michael> irrelevant) I guess the problem has to do with the following
Michael> settings
It is indeed irrelevant. You can ignore it.
We will try to improve the situation by
Hello,
if I run
./configure --enable-debug --prefix=/what/ever
--with-extra-prefix=/what/ever --with-frontend=qt
--with-qt-dir=/usr/lib/qt-3.0.5
LyX says that xforms is missing (which is right but irrelevant) I guess
the problem has to do with the following settings
Special build flags:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:41:22AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> If the insetpagebreak goes in, does that increment the document format?
Yes.
> I guess it would have to, since the paragraphs that have before or after
> page-break toggles set would have to be converted.
Yes.
Andre'
--
Thos
If the insetpagebreak goes in, does that increment the document format?
I guess it would have to, since the paragraphs that have before or after
page-break toggles set would have to be converted.
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associates, Inc.
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:21:49AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Well, I was just trying to think of why this may not be desirable. It
> seems that I have not been convinving, which in itself is a good
> reason for accepting the patch :)
>
> So I think that this patch can go in.
... after
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:49:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> But \newpage does not necessarily end a page. In two column mode,
>> it So you have \pagebreak (which additionally can take a parameter
>> saying And then you
It's 4.15pm in Perth at the moment...so it will have to be that the
alcohol ratio is (far) too low, or too much time doing FE analysis. A
bottle of wine tonight might correct both of those.
;) >-|
^
|
\-- Wine glass...
Rod
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 04:16:22PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
> I can only think that I didn't do a make distclean and autogen before I
> tried running make again. Though I am open to other suggestions about what
> I may have done wrong.
Alcohol/blood ratio too high or too low? ;-)
Andre'
I can only think that I didn't do a make distclean and autogen before I
tried running make again. Though I am open to other suggestions about what
I may have done wrong.
Rod
On 9 Jul 2003, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
> Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | 1.7 works this time
Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 1.7 works this time...stupid user error :)
What was the error?
--
Lgb
1.7 works this time...stupid user error :)
Thanks for the help,
Rod
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Rod Pinna wrote:
> I choose automake 1.6, (1.6.3 to be exact) and it seems to compile. I've
> just stopped it, remove automake 1.6, and reinstalled 1.7. Doing a new
> cycle of autogen, configure, make to see
I choose automake 1.6, (1.6.3 to be exact) and it seems to compile. I've
just stopped it, remove automake 1.6, and reinstalled 1.7. Doing a new
cycle of autogen, configure, make to see if it dies again. I'll let y'all
know hoe it goes.
Rod
_
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Note patch committed! (and I didn't forget the changelog :)
Some comments:
1. greyedout code is still wrong.
You are using
\textcolor[gray]{0.8}{
}
which breaks latex as soon as you have more than one paragraph (or a
non-standard paragraph).
Use
\c
Yup, I have version 2.57 installed. I've previously done an apt-get
dselect-upgrade, so (hopefully) have updated everything.
Rod
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Rod Pinna wrote:
> >
> > Bloody buggery...I thought going to testing would avoid this...
> >
> > I see there is an autom
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:29:36AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:25:24AM +0200, Asger Kunuk Alstrup wrote:
>
> > I understand that statical linking is a problem, but is dynamic linking
> > also a problem?
>
> Not sure, but also requiring each user to take out a license so
62 matches
Mail list logo
