Re: jura.cls mit LyX

2002-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:27:50PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > The following message is a courtesy copy of an article > that has been posted to de.comp.text.tex as well. I'll try to translate this (freely) into English lest we get examples of Norwegian or Hebrew poetry next time (comments in []

Re: [PATCH] qt resize patch latest

2002-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:00:03PM +, John Levon wrote: > > > > > > "short" makes me go: "Hu! Why? Anything special going on here?" > > > > why not save some memory ? > > The saving is negligible (compared to the memory already us

Re: further

2002-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:34:58PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What I do not see is what is the practical use of removing the > extension on output... We should output without extension when there > is no extension in the graphics file name (and use the same rules to > search as latex/pdfl

Re: further

2002-12-10 Thread Rod Pinna
This one works well for me. Rod On 10 Dec 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "Rod" == Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rod> Futher to that last bit... The image in lyx is called as > Rod> something.epsi, bu

Re: Letter - My Address

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:02:59PM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote: > The letter layout is totally bizarr. Try completing Send to address and > Opening. > Then DVI will display all. bizarre indeed ... I gave up and used explicit formatting commands. Hurrah for LyX way ;) regards john -- "Saying th

Re: Letter - My Address

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:16:02AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | None of the contents of My Address layout appear in the dvi output > > Is this a bug report? It is somewhat lacking... new document class to letter select "My address" layout typ

Re: [PATCH] qt resize patch latest

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:18:25AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > basically most special/general to least special/general. Erm, most special or most general ? note qt2/ has to do spiecial things due to Qt headers anyway > | > | + font_info * fi = > | > | fontinfo_[f.family()][f.serie

Re: [PATCH] qt resize patch latest

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:48:02PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > | +#include | > | + | > | +#include "encoding.h" | > | #include "lyxfont.h" | > | | > | #include | > | > include order | | I have never been able to work out what you want

Re: Letter - My Address

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | None of the contents of My Address layout appear in the dvi output Is this a bug report? It is somewhat lacking... -- Lgb

Re: jura.cls mit LyX

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Kastrup) writes: | The following message is a courtesy copy of an article | that has been posted to de.comp.text.tex as well. Can some one give a quick translation so that I know what to mean about this? -- Lgb

Re: Bugzilla

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:24:04PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: > > For example, scrolling past a large tabular will be broken in 1.3.0 > > Argh! I have a lot of large tabulars! I'm afraid so. The persons unknown who broke this have yet to come forward :( > > > #576 (if it applies for 1.3.0)

Re: jura.cls mit LyX

2002-12-10 Thread David Kastrup
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to de.comp.text.tex as well. Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ralf Zosel schrieb: > >> > >>wenn man diese Level kennt, ist es eine Kleinigkeit, > >>sie auf ein LyX Layout zu übertragen. > > Wenn das so einfach i

Re: Bugzilla

2002-12-10 Thread Michael Schmitt
Hi John, > For example, scrolling past a large tabular will be broken in 1.3.0 Argh! I have a lot of large tabulars! > > #576 (if it applies for 1.3.0) is critical > > critical ? hardly ! Depends on the point of view. If I cannot trust LyX that it really replaces all occurrences of a particula

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:04:31PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > >> 1) first patch to enable Layout->Preamble > > I don't think we want this. Preamble has been moved to the Document > dialog. We need to make the menus frontend-specific to remove the menu Ah, I knew I wa

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Edwin Leuven wrote: > And after sending this I contniued to read the thread: sorry (guess I am > still asleep). > > Ed. Don't worry... For sure you were not the only one... Thanks¸ Alfredo

Re: [QT] References

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:37:33PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Please look at this patch, it's very small. Thanks, Alfredo I already committed it john -- "Saying that taste is just personal preference is a good way to prevent disputes. The trouble is, it's not true." - Paul Graha

Re: Code Freeze

2002-12-10 Thread Bruce Sass
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:17:10AM -0700, Bruce Sass wrote: > > Sounds like it will need to be a ./configure thing (which sizes (or > > styles) to generate, where to place them, ... ). In which case LyX > > can choose whatever size and format it likes, b

Re: [QT] References

2002-12-10 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Small bugs on References Dialog. When editing a reference, the type was > not correctly updated. Patch attached. Please look at this patch, it's very small. Thanks, Alfredo

Letter - My Address

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
None of the contents of My Address layout appear in the dvi output john -- "Saying that taste is just personal preference is a good way to prevent disputes. The trouble is, it's not true." - Paul Graham

Re: further

2002-12-10 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:34:58PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > What I do not see is what is the practical use of removing the > extension on output... We should output without extension when there > is no extension in the graphics file name (and use the same rules to > search as latex/p

Re: lyx/URL -> html problem

2002-12-10 Thread Bo Peng
> \htmladdnormallink is latex2html specific. > The correct way is probably to use the \href command from hyperref > (though some latex->html converters might not support it). > Another problem is that some users might not want to use hyperref when > creating the DVI/PS/PDF file (as it may interfere

Re: [PATCH] qt resize patch latest

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > "short" makes me go: "Hu! Why? Anything special going on here?" > > > > why not save some memory ? > > The saving is negligible (compared to the memory already used by the map, and > the memory used to hold the font). We have to

Re: lyx/URL -> html problem

2002-12-10 Thread Bo Peng
> Since you seem to know what is needed, how about making a patch ? What > are the difficulties ... if it's really so trivial to do. Well, good idea. I do know what to change as long as I know where to change it. I am TOATALLY new to lyx code so can anyone tell me which part of the lyx-devel dea

Re: [PATCH] qt resize patch latest

2002-12-10 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:00:03PM +, John Levon wrote: > > > > "short" makes me go: "Hu! Why? Anything special going on here?" > > why not save some memory ? The saving is negligible (compared to the memory already used by the map, and the memory used to hold the font). > > And why cannot

Re: lyx/URL -> html problem

2002-12-10 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:38:30PM +, John Levon wrote: > > Since I use this feature a lot, I would hope it can be done in_ > > 1.3. Currently, I use a csh script to translate the URL inset of a lyx_ > > file to ERT/htmladdnormallink and then export it to latex. > > Since you seem to know what

Re: lyx/URL -> html problem

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:34:50PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote: > > There have been no changes here._ > > It seems to me that the URL boxes are meaningless if they can not be_ > exported to HTML/links correctly. (I know, it helps latex use the_ > correct font for links :-) > > Since I use this feature

Re: lyx/URL -> html problem

2002-12-10 Thread Bo Peng
> > There is a long existing problem with lyx/url and was discussed in_ > > lyx-users several times. When exporting lyx url to html format, the_ > > links turn to normal text. Temporary solution is to use ERT and_ > > \htmladdnormallink. Will 1.3 fix this problem?_ > There have been no changes her

Re: [PATCH] qt resize patch latest

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:48:02PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | +#include > | + > | +#include "encoding.h" > | #include "lyxfont.h" > | > | #include > > include order I have never been able to work out what you wanted with these, and I never understood your summary > | + ///

Re: [PATCH] qt resize patch latest

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | +#include | + | +#include "encoding.h" | #include "lyxfont.h" | | #include include order | @@ -44,6 +47,10 @@ | QFontMetrics const & metrics(LyXFont const & f) { | return getfontinfo(f)->metrics; | } | + | + /// retur

Re: [PATCH] speed up Qt resize

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:36:45PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > Another idea is to just cache the width for the default text font. This would reduce the speedup we get... regards john -- "Saying that taste is just personal preference is a good way to prevent disputes. The trouble is, it's not tr

a question

2002-12-10 Thread Lina Yordanova
Haloo, I would like to insert and process text in bulgarian language in lyx. I used to have phonetic bulgarian keyboard in other applications but in lyx I suspect it is impossible. 1. Only bg-bds-cp1251.kmap is available in /usr/share/lyx/kbd. 2. When I tried a kmap file form another package f

[PATCH] qt resize patch latest

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
Here it is. OK ? This is a little faster; sub-second times on userguide are now common, so it's pretty much on a par with xforms (glacial) speed regards john -- "Saying that taste is just personal preference is a good way to prevent disputes. The trouble is, it's not true." - Paul Graha

Re: [PATCH] speed up Qt resize

2002-12-10 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:10:46PM +, John Levon wrote: > > One solution (other than cleaning the cache) is to store > > (qfont_loader::font_info const *, int) pairs instead of > > (LyXFont, int) pairs. > > I'm going to do something similar indeed. Another idea is to just cache the width for

Re: lyx/URL -> html problem

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 12:31:58PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote: > There is a long existing problem with lyx/url and was discussed in > lyx-users several times. When exporting lyx url to html format, the > links turn to normal text. Temporary solution is to use ERT and > \htmladdnormallink. Will 1.3 fi

lyx/URL -> html problem

2002-12-10 Thread Bo Peng
There is a long existing problem with lyx/url and was discussed in lyx-users several times. When exporting lyx url to html format, the links turn to normal text. Temporary solution is to use ERT and \htmladdnormallink. Will 1.3 fix this problem? I searched bugzilla with keyword url but I could

Re: further

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:34:58PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What I do not see is what is the practical use of removing the > extension on output... We should output without extension when there > is no extension in the graphics file name (and use the same rules to > search as latex/pdf

Re: Bugzilla

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:24:00AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: > Decide what needs to be fixed before 1.3.0 is released. For example, bug We've done that, and already punted some very important bugs :( For example, scrolling past a large tabular will be broken in 1.3.0 > #576 (if it applies

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 12:23:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Another solution: add a method GUIruntime::isImplemented(kb_action) > that would return false for not implemented actions. Then these would > be ignored by MenuBackend. The advantage is simplicity, and > possibility to ignore

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:28:56AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Wouldn't it even for 1.3 be simpler to have the 'name' argument and an 'if' > > cascade in the Qt implementation? > > Whatever. It should needs implementing SOMEHOW. Two minutes to code. 10 > minutes to compile on a fast machine

Re: [PATCH] speed up Qt resize

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:48:59AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I have a feeling that the cache is a bit more complex than it needs to > be, but I cannot quite put my finger on it... I'm going to rework things a bit I think > How often is metrics for whole strings wanted? Not often. the

Re: [PATCH] speed up Qt resize

2002-12-10 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:57:08AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > What happens when the user changes the font in the preferences dialog ? > If I'm not mistaken, the cache will not be cleared. Yes it will. Like I mentioned ... > One solution (other than cleaning the cache) is to store > (qfont_loade

Re: further

2002-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Rod" == Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rod> Given Rob's comment wrt .agr files, maybe a better way would be Rod> to only leave the extension if it is one of the eps formats (epsi Rod> etc) that the latex can deal with? As I wrote a in my previous message, Rob's problem is related to

Re: further

2002-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rob> Shouldn't you remove all extensions of each figure input file? I Rob> use Grace files (.agr extension), which goes as .agr files into Rob> the LaTeX export file. Of cource LaTeX doen't know what to do Rob> with Grace files and reports erro

Re: further

2002-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
le is compressed. We have to return the + // orig_file_with_path, maybe it is a zipped one + + // If the extension is not the default one (e.g. .epsi + // instead of .eps), then we do not remove it. (JMarc 20021210) + if (formats.getFormat(to)->extension() == GetExtension(orig_file)) {

Re: XForms: Future xforms development

2002-12-10 Thread Steve Lamont
> I cannot see it -- I am really happy with your efforts, Steve. Please, folks. I wasn't fishing for pats on the back (or kicks in the tush, for that matter :-)), just thinking out loud. spl

Re: XForms: Future xforms development

2002-12-10 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Steve Lamont wrote: > It may be that I am not the right person for this job, inasmuch as my > professional responsibilities continue to evolve and my collaborative > projects continue to proliferate. > > If it is the group's consensus that someone else should assume these > r

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 10 December 2002 16:34, Angus Leeming wrote: >> Ie, can you envisage ANY situations where one >> might want to pass auto-repeat events to the widgets? > | When Lars finally commit his insetgame that he has in one of the | other trees we develo

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 10 December 2002 4:18 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> | Ok. I'm getting there. You want code like this: >> >> Sorry for leading you on a leash like that... >> >> As we progressed I began feeling a bit queasy...it might not be som >> clever a

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 16:34, Angus Leeming wrote: > Ie, can you envisage ANY situations where one > might want to pass auto-repeat events to the widgets? When Lars finally commit his insetgame that he has in one of the other trees we develops. (?) ;-) That would be uber cool. ::-) > R

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 4:18 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Ok. I'm getting there. You want code like this: > > Sorry for leading you on a leash like that... > > As we progressed I began feeling a bit queasy...it might not be som > clever after all. > > ..but yes, something similar to this

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 10 December 2002 3:26 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> What we do not want is cursors, auto-repeat chars that just continue >> to go after the key has been released. so we use xsync for this. >> The problem is to know when to run this xsync,

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 3:26 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > What we do not want is cursors, auto-repeat chars that just continue > to go after the key has been released. so we use xsync for this. > The problem is to know when to run this xsync, we want to loose as few > xevents as possible. >

Re: Code Freeze

2002-12-10 Thread Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
Juergen Vigna wrote: > Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > >> Hmm, life would become easier for lyx and other projects, if lyx used >> standard sizes. Also most if not all of the KDE icons are available as >> SVG, >> so you could just rerender them for the lyx size. > > Hmm if you tell us the rule

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 10 December 2002 3:01 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> | On Tuesday 10 December 2002 2:29 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >> >> Look at the time difference between the KEYRELEASE and KEYPRESS >>

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 3:01 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | On Tuesday 10 December 2002 2:29 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> >> Look at the time difference between the KEYRELEASE and KEYPRESS > >> >> events. > >> | > >> | Why? Ie, I don't unde

Re: XForms: Future xforms development

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 2:51 pm, Steve Lamont wrote: > It may be that I am not the right person for this job, inasmuch as my > professional responsibilities continue to evolve and my collaborative > projects continue to proliferate. Nah! > I am chastened. Don't be. None of this was meant as

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Ronny Buchmann
Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2002 13:13 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 21:01, Angus Leeming wrote: > >> Ok, it's out. > >> > >> Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX 1.3? > | > | I would say that it needs to go, b

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 10 December 2002 2:29 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >> Look at the time difference between the KEYRELEASE and KEYPRESS >> >> events. >> | >> | Why? Ie, I don't understand what you're attempting to do with this code. >> >> Just do it >>

Re: XForms: Future xforms development

2002-12-10 Thread Steve Lamont
> Steve, how do you see future development of xforms panning out? At > present it seems to be stagnating somewhat. That may seem churlish, > given that you only released 1.0final over the weekend, but it isn't > meant to be. I'm merely pointing out the reality of a release that > occurred 6 months

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 2:29 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Look at the time difference between the KEYRELEASE and KEYPRESS > >> events. > | > | Why? Ie, I don't understand what you're attempting to do with this code. > > Just do it > > KeyRelease event, serial 27, synthetic NO, window

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 10 December 2002 2:19 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> | Lars, the attached patch to xforms' forms.c cures these two bugs in >> | xforms handling of key events. >> | >> | o xforms should swallow nu

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 2:19 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars, the attached patch to xforms' forms.c cures these two bugs in > | xforms handling of key events. > | > | o xforms should swallow null keyevents. They occur during composition of > |

Re: XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars, the attached patch to xforms' forms.c cures these two bugs in xforms | handling of key events. > | o xforms should swallow null keyevents. They occur during composition of | multi-byte chars. The problem was reported and a solution proposed here:

XworkArea handler cont.

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars, the attached patch to xforms' forms.c cures these two bugs in xforms handling of key events. o xforms should swallow null keyevents. They occur during composition of multi-byte chars. The problem was reported and a solution proposed here: o xforms should pass FL_KEYRELEASE events to the w

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Stephan Witt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> Yesterday I tried to compile 1.0-release on my solaris Stephan> machine. I can't say it compiles out of the box, but the Stephan> problems where solveable. But I didn't try to install the Stephan> shared

Re: BUG: insetwrap ignored totally

2002-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:20:15PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > This is also one of the reasons why I was not so enthusiastic about > the InsetWrap in the first place. There are just to many special rules > that must be followed to make it work properly. > > The rules should be enforced by

Re: BUG: insetwrap ignored totally

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 07:15:23PM +, John Levon wrote: >> > This is a feature of the floatflt package. >> > When you have a floatingfigure, it will be put at the next paragraph. >> > But if there is no next paragraph, the floatingfigure is ignored.

Future xforms development

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Steve, how do you see future development of xforms panning out? At present it seems to be stagnating somewhat. That may seem churlish, given that you only released 1.0final over the weekend, but it isn't meant to be. I'm merely pointing out the reality of a release that occurred 6 months after y

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> IMHO we should let 0.88 go now, and wait a short while into the | Lars> freeze period before we make final decision on 0.89. (currently | Lars> I am inclined to keep 0.89 f

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 10 December 2002 11:15 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | | > | Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok,

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | redundant now | Lars> (preamble is in document settings dialog). I also think the | | Lars> show preamble entry should be removed

Re: [PATCH] speed up Qt resize

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: What is the used for? | +typedef pair MetricPair; | +typedef vector MetricList; | +typedef map CharMetrics; | +CharMetrics char_metrics; | + | +int singlewidth(Uchar val, LyXFont const & f) | +{ | + CharMetrics::iterator it(char_metrics.find(val)); |

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> IMHO we should let 0.88 go now, and wait a short while into the Lars> freeze period before we make final decision on 0.89. (currently Lars> I am inclined to keep 0.89 for 1.3.0) Agreed. Is there special code for 0.89 vs 1.0? J

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | redundant now Lars> (preamble is in document settings dialog). I also think the | Lars> show preamble entry should be removed from the (qt) menu. Lars> Or just make the QDocument::prea

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 11:10 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:09:35AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > No. I reckon that for 1.3 you should go for the simple to code multiple > > virtual bool haveXYZ() { return true; } > > and overload the few cases in Qt where they dec

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 11:15 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. > | Lars> | > | Lars> | Are we going to kee

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | redundant now (preamble is in document settings dialog). I also think the | show preamble entry should be removed from the (qt) menu. Or just make the QDocument::preamble pop up... -- Lgb

Re: [PATCH] speed up Qt resize

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 12:41:26AM +, John Levon wrote: | | > Well I'm out of ideas so here's a dumb patch that caches single widths. | | btw, a map based approach is at least twice as slower than | the vector one below | | > resize took 1.64121 seco

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. | Lars> | | Lars> | Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX | Lars> 1.3? | | Lars> _I_ woul

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:09:35AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > No. I reckon that for 1.3 you should go for the simple to code multiple > virtual bool haveXYZ() { return true; } > and overload the few cases in Qt where they decided that they don't want a > dialog. Wouldn't it even for 1.3

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:47 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> Excellent idea. It's a major pain that adding a new dialog > Angus> causes the re-compilation of the whole LyX tree. > > In this case, we should also have showDialog(string const & name) and > a map name->dialog of some sort

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:51 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:15 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > Angus> wrote: > >> But it does the compose key preprocessing first. > > Angus> Not totally true. I

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:15 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Angus> wrote: >> But it does the compose key preprocessing first. Angus> Not totally true. It passes all FL_KEYPRESS events to the Angus> XWorkArea handler. It just so happ

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:21 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:27:08AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > >> Well then, I see no alternative but to write a bunch of 1-line >> functions > for each frontend (below

Re: Bugzilla

2002-12-10 Thread Michael Schmitt
John Levon wrote: It's not possible to have multiple target milestones. Oh... intend to make some final corrections this week, it might be useful to restructure the bug list. how ? Decide what needs to be fixed before 1.3.0 is released. For example, bug #576 (if it applies for 1.3.0

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:21 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:27:08AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Well then, I see no alternative but to write a bunch of 1-line functions > > for each frontend (below). If they default to true, then you'll have to > > overload only a fe

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:15 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > But it does the compose key preprocessing first. Not totally true. It passes all FL_KEYPRESS events to the XWorkArea handler. It just so happens that during composition the passed "key" is null. That's why this can be made to wo

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:27:08AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Well then, I see no alternative but to write a bunch of 1-line functions for > each frontend (below). If they default to true, then you'll have to overload > only a few in the respective frontends... > > frontends/Dialogs.h > > cl

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:06 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Jean-Marc, none of them are hooked to signals anymore. See > Angus> xforms/Dialogs_impl.h, xforms/Dialogs2.C. > > OK, I see. > > Angus> What we could do is have

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 9:57 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Angus> wrote: >> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. Lars> | Lars> | Are we go

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:07:10AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > >So what was the final decision on this? I think we should get rid of > >0.88 now, since it is the most problematic. Note however that this > >will cause problems for people who use solaris and for cjk-lyx, > >because of shortcomings

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:07 am, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > So what was the final decision on this? I think we should get rid of > > 0.88 now, since it is the most problematic. Note however that this > > will cause problems for people who use solaris and for cjk-lyx

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 9:57 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. > Lars> | > Lars> | Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX > Lars> 1.3? > > La

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> Yesterday I tried to compile 1.0-release on my solaris Stephan> machine. I can't say it compiles out of the box, but the Stephan> problems where solveable. But I didn't try to install the Stephan> shared libs, because of the susp

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Juergen Vigna
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what was the final decision on this? I think we should get rid of 0.88 now, since it is the most problematic. Note however that this will cause problems for people who use solaris and for cjk-lyx, because of shortcomings ion xforms support for input methods. But thi

Re: [QT] Layout->Preamble

2002-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc, none of them are hooked to signals anymore. See Angus> xforms/Dialogs_impl.h, xforms/Dialogs2.C. OK, I see. Angus> What we could do is have all these methods return a bool Angus> telling the core whether the request has

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Stephan Witt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. Lars> | Lars> | Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX Lars> 1.3? Lars> _I_ would like us to ditch support for 0.88 and

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

2002-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. Lars> | Lars> | Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX Lars> 1.3? Lars> _I_ would like us to ditch support for 0.88 and 0.89 at once, Lars> especi

Re: [PATCH] speed up Qt resize

2002-12-10 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:01:36AM +, John Levon wrote: > > Unless somebody has major complaints I'm going to commit it ... What happens when the user changes the font in the preferences dialog ? If I'm not mistaken, the cache will not be cleared. One solution (other than cleaning the cache)

Re: Code Freeze

2002-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:17:10AM -0700, Bruce Sass wrote: > Sounds like it will need to be a ./configure thing (which sizes (or > styles) to generate, where to place them, ... ). In which case LyX > can choose whatever size and format it likes, but would need to manage > the conversion(s). Soun

  1   2   >