On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:34:58PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What I do not see is what is the practical use of removing the
> extension on output... We should output without extension when there
> is no extension in the graphics file name (and use the same rules to
> search as latex/pdflatex), but not remove them.
> 
> Does anybody know why this is supposed to be a good idea?

Just guessing: When you hand over a .tex to a colleague it is pretty
inconvenient to have any explicit extension in the file as this would mean
he is either restricted to a single output (.ps or .pdf) or have to remove
the extensions himself...

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Reply via email to