On Tuesday 10 December 2002 11:10 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:09:35AM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > No. I reckon that for 1.3 you should go for the simple to code multiple
> > virtual bool haveXYZ() { return true; }
> > and overload the few cases in Qt where they decided that they don't want
> > a dialog.
>
> Wouldn't it even for 1.3 be simpler to have the 'name' argument and an 'if'
> cascade in the Qt implementation?
Whatever. It should needs implementing SOMEHOW. Two minutes to code. 10
minutes to compile on a fast machine (*). 1 minute to commit. Go for it.
Angus
(*) my LyX machine is not fast. I'm not going to do this.
