On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:28:35PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I see. Explanation accepted. So what you're saying is that we actually
> should have buttons for both \mathsf and \textsf within math (no matter
> how implemented)?
Yes.
> Anyway, I suggest you do something that fixes the 'haywir
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:24:42PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I believe it is 'go back to default math font'. You are in math when you
> press this button -- or at least you're supposed to be...
This does not play well with the "font changes are insets" idea very well.
Of course one could jus
On Thursday 19 September 2002 08:05, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > UGGGH !!
> >
> > This has got to die quickly :)
>
> 1.1.6 behaviour.
Actually IIRC this is 0.12 or even 0.10 behaviour. (Ok, I didn't used
previous versions on a regular basis. ;-)
> Andre'
--
José Abílio
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:30:59PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 04:51:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > > > I don't even use any font lfun from qt math panel.
>
> But perhaps you should. Otherwise you won't be able to select a range of
> characters and change t
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:36:38PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:38:47AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > No, we don't! We should, I agree, but we don't: "emphasise" from
> > layout->char inserts mathcal into math (not textit), and "noun" does
> > mathbb, not textbb, et
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:57:29PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:46:42PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > We already have that. the math panel menus should insert the math forms,
> > the others should insert the text versions. I don't get why this is such
> > a big problem.
> >
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:46:42PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> I don't understand what we're arguing about - I can't see a good reason
> that the math panel should ever insert something other than the math
> forms.
Well, than just call MATH_INSERT "mathsf" from the panel. I would not
notice, it w
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 07:37:06PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > Is this sensible?
>
> Yes.
> [..]
> Having different behavior than previous version will also make it harder to
> answer questions in lyx-users.
> (if you are in lyx 1.2.0, type \foo{, in lyx 1.3.0, type \foo\{ etc.)
Ok, it's like t
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:53:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> Ouch, yes, I hadn't thought of this problem :/
>
> As I see it, either we have one menu and one lfun, or two menus for
> two lfuns.
>
> Would it be possible to rename/move the tabular menu so that it makes
> sense for
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | I'd say: call it "Default" and let the tooltip explain further; instead
> | of using asterisk with a tooltip that says "Default".
>
> Using a tooltip for this is about the worst solution ever...
>
> If you are so afrai
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> I really don't care too much. Try to get consensus among those
> Andre> who care and change it.
>
> I think the problem was to use tabular feature for maths. As it is
> now, the Edit>Math>Array would be enabled if we a
"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > real "Default" button could be added, besides it is nice to know what
| > | > the default is as well.
| > | This is a problem with many of
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:12:49PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> How would the user use \textsf within mathed if LFUN_SANS were
> Andre> changed to insert \mathsf?
>
> Does any of you know what is the difference between
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 04:11:49PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> So \mathsf is going to be unsupported by the GUI ?
Yes. And so are more than 50% of all mathed features. I am not too
concerned about one of them I personally have never used before.
> Do you think this is a step forwards ? I don't.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> The fast solution that will not require any code changes outside the
> gui is to add a "Reset to Defaults" button for now. Later, 1.4.0cvs, a
> real "Default" button could be added, besides it is nice to know what
> the default is as well.
I don't think this is doab
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > real "Default" button could be added, besides it is nice to know what
> | > the default is as well.
> | This is a problem with many of the "Default" buttons. I keep asking
> | myself "
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > real "Default" button could be added, besides it is nice to know what
| > the default is as well.
| This is a problem with many of the "Default" buttons. I keep asking
| myself "what's that mean?"
In this specific case
"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| At present, there is no such thing as "Default aligment". And in
| fact a paragraph always has one out of the four choices (BLOCK,
| LEFT, RIGHT and CENTER) and that is what shows up in the dialog now.
|
| Introducing a Default, would need quite some mor
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:59:56AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>>>| Should "Block" alignment be better named "Justified" (as in Qt) ?
>>>
>>>Left justified or Right justfied? or perhaps Block justified.
>>>
>>>As I
John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:20:09PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>>Would be cute to replace these words by small icons; you know, the ones
>>used by any wordprocessor: 5 stacked lines that show what sort of
>>alignment it does. Would that be a way to go?
>
>
> Sounds like a b
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:38:47AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> No, we don't! We should, I agree, but we don't: "emphasise" from
> layout->char inserts mathcal into math (not textit), and "noun" does
> mathbb, not textbb, etc.
UGGGH !!
This has got to die quickly :)
regards
john
--
"Please
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:46:42PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > I think the GUI should both support text?? and math?? for ?? = bf, sf,
> > tt, ...
>
> We already have that. the math panel menus should insert the math forms,
> the others should insert the text versions. I don't get why this is s
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:46:42PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> We already have that. the math panel menus should insert the math forms,
> the others should insert the text versions. I don't get why this is such
> a big problem.
>
> I don't understand what we're arguing about - I can't see a good r
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:30:59PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > dispatch(FuncRequest(LFUN_INSERT_MATH, "\\mathbf"))
>
> E.g. like this.
>
> André: does this do font change on selection?
It does. It works fine.
> > > How would the user use \textsf within mathed if LFUN_SANS were change
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:12:49PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Does any of you know what is the difference between \textsf and
> \mathsf in math mode and can he comment on their relative usefulness?
> It is something I always wondered about.
>
> JMarc
I suppose it has to do with the s
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 04:11:49PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 04:51:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > I don't even use any font lfun from qt math panel.
But perhaps you should. Otherwise you won't be able to select a range of
characters and change them to some fo
> I'm continuing reworking the xforms dialogs, for after the freeze, that is
> :).
>
> Attached is a screenshot of my new "Paragraph Layout".
If you're looking for outside opinions, here's mine: I like this layout better
than the one in 1.2.1, and much better than the one that appears later in t
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:20:09PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Star Office (5.2) has following:
>
> Justify
> Align right
> Align left
> Centered
They've mixed up their wording. Ugh.
> Would be cute to replace these words by small icons; you know, the ones
> used by any wordprocessor:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 05:44:26PM +0200, peter drummond wrote:
> Dear Lyx developers
>
> this is a file produced by reLyX on a valid
> Latex file. It instantly sends LyX into an
> endless loop, which can only be stopped -
> -apparently - with `kill'.
Please open a "critical" bug on bugzilla.ly
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 09:33:21AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> OK, then I suggest a compromis: while the dialog is open, we leave buttons
> as they are (checked or unchecked), so hopping between the three main
> choices
> does not forget the checkbuttons. However, by closing & reopening the
> dial
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 01:00:09PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > To make things more confusing, can you make { produce {} if
> > mathed is in "LaTeX mode" ?
> > Namely, \foo{ should produce \foo{} in the latex output.
> >
> > This is the 1.1.6 behavior.
>
> Is this sensible?
Yes.
> I underst
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:20:41PM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> If it matters, I just discovered that the bug only applies while using
> the mouse; I entered a table with arrow keys and it worked.
Hmm, well that's odd.
My fix was not to disable Cut function if there was a table cell
s
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:08:49PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:05:27PM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > I rebuilt from cvs yesterday. It seems that when selecting multiple
> > cells in a table (mine was 5x4 with 1 digit numbers), it is no longer
> > possible to
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:05:27PM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> I rebuilt from cvs yesterday. It seems that when selecting multiple
> cells in a table (mine was 5x4 with 1 digit numbers), it is no longer
> possible to clear the table with "cut".
I committed the fix yesterday
john
--
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:53:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Would it be possible to rename/move the tabular menu so that it makes
> sense for math and tables?
I don't believe so.
regards
john
--
"Please crack down on the Chinaman's friends and Hitler's commander. Mother is
the bes
I rebuilt from cvs yesterday. It seems that when selecting multiple
cells in a table (mine was 5x4 with 1 digit numbers), it is no longer
possible to clear the table with "cut".
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (8
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> I think the problem was to use tabular feature for maths. As it is
>> now, the Edit>Math>Array would be enabled if we are inside a
>> tabular, whereas there
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think the problem was to use tabular feature for maths. As it is
> now, the Edit>Math>Array would be enabled if we are inside a tabular,
> whereas there is no math array in sight.
Ouch, yes, I hadn't thought of this proble
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:28:35PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> > > You have to use the tabular menu. This must be fixed in the
>> menus before > > 1.3.0
>> >
>> > How? By duplicating Edit->Tabular under Edit->Math->Array??
>>
>>
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:18:57AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> I know what the problem is, but need some free minutes to fix it.
>
| So you know how to fix it now ?
>
| I don't understand your previous explanations, because we don't have
| probl
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:26:12PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:47:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 02:42:20PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> > > Fix attached (xforms). Fixes also the textsf/te
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> How would the user use \textsf within mathed if LFUN_SANS were
Andre> changed to insert \mathsf?
Does any of you know what is the difference between \textsf and
\mathsf in math mode and can he comment on their relative usefulness?
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 04:51:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > I don't even use any font lfun from qt math panel.
>
>
> dispatch(FuncRequest(LFUN_INSERT_MATH, "\\mathbf"))
>
> basically reaches the same effect the same using a different way.
So you're telling me this will now actual
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:44:40PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > Because the lfun does \textbf outside math and I do not want to start with
> > this kind of "clever solutions" again.
>
> I don't even use any font lfun from qt math panel.
dispatch(FuncRequest(LFUN_INSERT_MATH, "\\mathbf")
>
> This is a good idea indeed. File a bugzilla enhancement bug ...
>
Done
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 04:38:01PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > why would \textsf be right and \mathsf be wrong ?
>
> Because the lfun does \textbf outside math and I do not want to start with
> this kind of "clever solutions" again.
I don't even use any font lfun from qt math panel.
How ar
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:18:57AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I know what the problem is, but need some free minutes to fix it.
So you know how to fix it now ?
I don't understand your previous explanations, because we don't have
problems with the gnome AM_CONDITIONALLs
regards
john
--
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:28:35PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > > You have to use the tabular menu. This must be fixed in the menus before
> > > 1.3.0
> >
> > How? By duplicating Edit->Tabular under Edit->Math->Array??
>
> Something like that. Wanting to reduce the complexity of the menus is a
>
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:26:12PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:47:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 02:42:20PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Fix attached (xforms). Fixes also the textsf/textnormal thingy.
> >
> > I don't think the \tex
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:37:39PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > BTW: if you call this dialog without knowing in what paragraph you are,
> > neither layout would be of help to you.
>
> I know, it's more that I sometimes forget which paragraph I was actually
> in (and sometimes the cur
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 04:04:14PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> degustibus non est disputandum
Doesn't apply (see Paul Graham for justification here)
> > Personally, I'm not very fond of tabs -- you sometimes spend too much time
> > trying to find the setting you're looking for...
>
> As you s
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 01:12:46PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > You have to use the tabular menu. This must be fixed in the menus before
> > 1.3.0
>
> How? By duplicating Edit->Tabular under Edit->Math->Array??
Something like that. Wanting to reduce the complexity of the menus is a
laudable
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:47:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 02:42:20PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Fix attached (xforms). Fixes also the textsf/textnormal thingy.
>
> I don't think the \textsf behaviour is broken.
Even if inserting textsf behaved correctly, wh
Home[1].htm
Description: Binary data
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:44:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 09:36:24AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > While we're at it (and this is a apropos the textsf bug too) why
> > (mathed/formulabase.C):
> >
> > // Math fonts
> > case LFUN_GREEK_TOGGLE: handleFont
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:14:57PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 03:17:54AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > Choose mathfrak then choose "reset. You get "textnormal" in frak.
>
> What is "reset"?
>
> > Has anybody ever used any of this stuff ? :)
>
> \mathfrak? Certainly.
> As somebody else said, it's nice to have most of the stuff in one dialog.
And as somebody else said, it's nice *not* to see the cruft that you only use
one out of ten times...
degustibus non est disputandum
> Personally, I'm not very fond of tabs -- you sometimes spend too much time
> trying
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:47:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 02:42:20PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Fix attached (xforms). Fixes also the textsf/textnormal thingy.
>
> I don't think the \textsf behaviour is broken.
>
> Andre'
Have you tried? It is for me.
./
Ok... this is off-topic, but... should I be replying to your e-mail
adresses as well as to the news group/mail list?
/C
PS. or should I just set Pine to throw avail mail that are also sent to
the list? DS
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:29:43PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > why not like the qt frontend?
> >
> > http://www.fee.uva.nl/scholar/mdw/leuven/lyx/par.gif
>
> As somebody else said, it's nice to have most of the stuff in one dialog.
> Personally, I'm not very fond of tabs -- you some
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> I've tried (attached) but what ever arrangement I make, it still
> doesn't look good. Too much mathematical/tabular logic in a dialog
> like this. That's what I actually tried to avoid in my earlier new
> layout.
I agree that the upper part doesn't looks
> why not like the qt frontend?
>
> http://www.fee.uva.nl/scholar/mdw/leuven/lyx/par.gif
As somebody else said, it's nice to have most of the stuff in one dialog.
Personally, I'm not very fond of tabs -- you sometimes spend too much time
trying to find the setting you're looking for...
--
Ch
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> On Wed Sep 18, 2002 15:02, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
>>I've tried (attached) but what ever arrangement I make, it still
>>doesn't look good.
>
>
> why not like the qt frontend?
>
> http://www.fee.uva.nl/scholar/mdw/leuven/lyx/par.gif
I don't think it's worth splitting it up ov
On Wed Sep 18, 2002 15:02, R. Lahaye wrote:
> I've tried (attached) but what ever arrangement I make, it still
> doesn't look good.
why not like the qt frontend?
http://www.fee.uva.nl/scholar/mdw/leuven/lyx/par.gif
Regards, Ed.
Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> How about a dialog like this:
>
> --
> Paragraph body
>
> No indent Alignment
> [] (left) (centre) (right) (block)
>
> Line spacing:[Default]
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:59:39AM +0200, Nicolas SABOURET wrote:
> > I write a french document. Suppose that I write an URL in my text.
> > To avoid the automatic space between "http" and "://", I select this
> > text and sets the character layout to "english". The prob
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:15:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Andre> www.lyx.org/help
>>
Andre> Is this supposed to work?
>> It does here.
Andre> Ev
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:15:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> www.lyx.org/help
>
> Andre> Is this supposed to work?
>
> It does here.
Even if you try to use the search box or click on the liks (like
"Boxing/Frames"
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> www.lyx.org/help
Andre> Is this supposed to work?
It does here.
JMarc
www.lyx.org/help
Is this supposed to work?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
> | > "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > | | Attached is a screenshot of my new "Paragraph Layout".
> | > | | I think this reflects much better the way one uses this dialog:
> | > | widgets are grouped together according to Above/Text/Below.
Hi
I'd just like to say that from my experie
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:59:56AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>> | Should "Block" alignment be better named "Justified" (as in Qt) ?
>>
>> Left justified or Right justfied? or perhaps Block justified.
>>
>> As I learned it "Justified" alone does n
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 11:59:57PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 10:43:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > In LyX-1.2.x you could change the alignment using the menu (in Edit>Math),
> > but I don't see these items in 1.3.0.
> > What happened to these items ?
>
> You have to
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:59:56AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Should "Block" alignment be better named "Justified" (as in Qt) ?
>
> Left justified or Right justfied? or perhaps Block justified.
>
> As I learned it "Justified" alone does not give full meaning.
Selecting this button ma
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 02:42:20PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> Fix attached (xforms).
>
| The spaces part looks ok. Try to get Lars' approval.
Your approval will suffice for now.
--
Lgb
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 11:29:03PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > Typing { produces blue { on screen and is written as \{
> > } } \}
> > \{ red {} (a BraceInset) {}
>
> To make things more confusing, can
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 10:43:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 05:58:22PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 09:25:50PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> >
> > > Of course it makes a difference. It changes the vertical alignment of the
> > > matrix.
> >
> > Oh I
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 02:42:20PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Fix attached (xforms).
The spaces part looks ok. Try to get Lars' approval.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 02:42:20PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Fix attached (xforms). Fixes also the textsf/textnormal thingy.
I don't think the \textsf behaviour is broken.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 09:36:24AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> While we're at it (and this is a apropos the textsf bug too) why
> (mathed/formulabase.C):
>
> // Math fonts
> case LFUN_GREEK_TOGGLE: handleFont(bv, cmd.argument, "lyxgreek"); break;
> case LFUN_BOLD: handleFo
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> The appended patch automatically runs lyxdir/configure if
Jean-Marc> the user's .lyx/lyxrc.defaults file does not exist or is
Jean-Marc> older than the configure script. The effect is that the
Jean-Marc> users' setup
On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 03:17:54AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Choose mathfrak then choose "reset. You get "textnormal" in frak.
What is "reset"?
> Has anybody ever used any of this stuff ? :)
\mathfrak? Certainly. But I haven't used reset so much since I switched
to Linux eight years ago...
An
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:15:37PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > See attachment.
>
> Can you be more detailed ? I don't see a drawing problem. Just a strange
> line merge
s/drawing problem/line merge problem/
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not hav
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:52:07PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure where the bottleneck is yet (well I know that all
> the .width() enquiries are expensive, but I'm not sure how to fix it)
By having two passes when drawing, the first one only to calculate metrics,
the second one
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hello,
>>
Lars> | IIRC you have decided to drop the "lyxcode" layout some time
Lars> ago. | What do you think about providing an "alltt" inset as
Lars> replacement? | It should be pretty simple to im
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hello,
>
| IIRC you have decided to drop the "lyxcode" layout some time ago.
| What do you think about providing an "alltt" inset as replacement?
| It should be pretty simple to implement based on the existing ERT inset.
>
| In the initial version of the ERT inset it w
Hello,
IIRC you have decided to drop the "lyxcode" layout some time ago.
What do you think about providing an "alltt" inset as replacement?
It should be pretty simple to implement based on the existing ERT inset.
In the initial version of the ERT inset it was possible to format text.
This is exa
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Hi,
| > | | I'm continuing reworking the xforms dialogs, for after the
| > freeze, that is :).
| > | | Attached is a screenshot of my new "Paragraph Layout".
| > | | I think this
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| You mean rounding problems according to main window width? Rather unlikely.
|
| I open the document with the main window width of 500 (is the default).
| The overlap problem is there, but is corrected as soon as I increase the
| width slightly. However, W
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | I'm continuing reworking the xforms dialogs, for after the freeze, that is :).
> |
> | Attached is a screenshot of my new "Paragraph Layout".
> |
> | I think this reflects much better the way one uses this d
Pascal Francq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| When ruuning the configure script with Qt used as frontend, I have the
| following error.
|
| checking for putenv... (cached) yes
| checking for setenv... (cached) yes
| checking for mkfifo... yes
| checking for mkstemp... yes
| checking for mktemp...
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | R. Lahaye wrote:
> | > Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> | >
> | >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:57:31PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | >>
> | >>> "Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >>
> | >>
> | >
When ruuning the configure script with Qt used as frontend, I have the
following error.
checking for putenv... (cached) yes
checking for setenv... (cached) yes
checking for mkfifo... yes
checking for mkstemp... yes
checking for mktemp... yes
checking types of arguments for select()... int,fd_set
"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| I'm continuing reworking the xforms dialogs, for after the freeze, that is :).
|
| Attached is a screenshot of my new "Paragraph Layout".
|
| I think this reflects much better the way one uses this dialog:
| widgets are grouped together accordi
"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| R. Lahaye wrote:
| > Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
| >
| >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:57:31PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
| >>
| >>> "Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>> | This is the lyx display, not the render
"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
| > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:57:31PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
| >
| >>"Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| >>| This is the lyx display, not the rendered latex.
| >
| >>| The Author is overwrit
Hi,
I'm continuing reworking the xforms dialogs, for after the freeze, that is :).
Attached is a screenshot of my new "Paragraph Layout".
I think this reflects much better the way one uses this dialog:
widgets are grouped together according to Above/Text/Below.
Some ideas are copied from Qt,
97 matches
Mail list logo
