Re: insert tabular

2002-07-22 Thread Juergen Vigna
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Concerning having a finite list of possible defaults, this should be > added to the 'tabular create' dialog. Yes! Jug -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mitterstrich

Re: insert tabular

2002-07-22 Thread Juergen Vigna
Edwin Leuven wrote: > Take alignment. Suppose I have a selection and I want to align right > > if I am in a multicolumn cell or have multicolumn cells in the selection > -> align multicolumn cell(s) right > > in I have selected a column > -> align column right > As much as I know we don't ha

Re: CVS generates empty Makefiles. Due to latest update in configure.in/acconfig.h?

2002-07-22 Thread Juergen Vigna
R. Lahaye wrote: > After an autogen.sh I still need to modify configure manually to add a > "-lXpm" to the LIBS when configure tests for -lforms. That's a nuissance. > > I thought there's some sort of consensus that Xforms library will not carry > the Xpm libs, so that always -lXpm will be needed

Re: 1.3.0cvs can't use template lyx files due to version conflict!

2002-07-22 Thread Juergen Vigna
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Juergen> I added this in old 0.12 times and also the supporting > Juergen> iletter.cls, but I think now as I will not support this > Juergen> anymore and so it is unsupported we should just remove this > Juergen> and the tex and template files from the lyx distrib. >

Re: LFUN_DROP_LAYOUTS_CHOICE

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 23 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | Did you get flogged or hung from the yard arm? | > | > No, but I had to (scuba) dive to help fix some hull/pipe problem. | | Keel hauling! | | Or did you do

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread David Kastrup
"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From http://www.gnu.org/manual -> glibc -> Signal Handling: > > -- > Termination Signals > > [...] > > int SIGTERM > The SIGTERM signal is a generic signal used to cause program > termination. Unlike SIGKILL,

Re: LFUN_DROP_LAYOUTS_CHOICE

2002-07-22 Thread Allan Rae
On 23 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Did you get flogged or hung from the yard arm? > > No, but I had to (scuba) dive to help fix some hull/pipe problem. Keel hauling! Or did you do a British Navy and park the ship on a rock? > | Did the Capt

Re: LFUN_DROP_LAYOUTS_CHOICE

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Did you get flogged or hung from the yard arm? No, but I had to (scuba) dive to help fix some hull/pipe problem. | Did the Captain have a parrot, an eye-patch and a wooden leg? No, only a sore throat. -- Lgb

Re: Using scoped_ptr

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | > John Levon wrote: | > | >> A subtle thing I found out a few weeks ago. You need to have an out of | >> line dtor for the object that has a scoped_ptr inside it. e.g. | >> XMiniBuffer needs an outofline dtor because

Re: LFUN_DROP_LAYOUTS_CHOICE

2002-07-22 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | How was the holiday ? > > Super nice! > > Sailing on a two masted ketch from 1879 for two weeks... I know the township of 1770 is halfway up the Queensland coast but where is the township of 1879

Graphics size values lost when 1.2.0 doc opened by 1.3.0cvs.

2002-07-22 Thread R. Lahaye
Hi, It appears the 1.3.0cvs has introduced a size_kind and lyxsize_kind for graphics in the lyx file. This was not there for 1.2.0. As a result, graphics sizes get lost when reading a 1.2.0 document by 1.3.0cvs. Has that been noticed? Rob.

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread R. Lahaye
John Levon writes: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:50:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > > > This is were we disagree. > > > > IMSNHO SIGTERM and SIGINT should behave exactly the same. > > Please provide a rationale >From http://www.gnu.org/manual -> glibc -> Signal Handling: -

Re: emph()

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 12:14:36AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >I'd like to understand why I need to add a special case for emph() to > >my Qt code but not xforms > > This should not be needed. Hmm, once again ... If I set italic in char dialog all is OK, but font-emph makes no differ

Re: emph()

2002-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John Levon wrote: > How does the X font loader get to display font emph code in italic ? > There doesn't seem to be any checking for emph() in the font loader > code. The font loader does not know about emph. Only LyXFont knows and the magic is done in LyXFont::realShape(). > I'd like to underst

Re: Using scoped_ptr

2002-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > John Levon wrote: > >> A subtle thing I found out a few weeks ago. You need to have an out of >> line dtor for the object that has a scoped_ptr inside it. e.g. >> XMiniBuffer needs an outofline dtor because it contains a scoped_ptr as >> a member on a forward-declare

emph()

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
How does the X font loader get to display font emph code in italic ? There doesn't seem to be any checking for emph() in the font loader code. I'd like to understand why I need to add a special case for emph() to my Qt code but not xforms thanks john -- "Of all manifestations of power, restra

Re: qt2 frontend compilation error

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 12:38:32AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > 3.0.4 > > Still doesn't work (same error). Well I'm lost : http://doc.trolltech.com/3.0/qwidget.html#setMinimumSize Can you check your headers do actually have this ? regards john -- "Of all manifestations of power, restrain

InsetCitation - strange code

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Have a look at this, the warning I added and the reworked/cleaned up code: // Have to overwrite the default InsetCommand method in order to check that // the \cite command is valid. Eg, the user has natbib enabled, inputs some // citations and then changes his mind, turning natbib support off. T

Re: The size_kind change breaks reading of insetgraphics

2002-07-22 Thread Herbert Voss
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > When loading the UserGuide, I get: > > Unknown token, size_type, skipping. > Unknown token, 0, skipping. > Unknown token, lyxsize_type, skipping. > Unknown token, 0, skipping. ... > Certainly this is not intended? no, it's a problem now from the l

Re: qt2 frontend compilation error

2002-07-22 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:56:07PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > > What Qt version please ? > > > > 3.0.4 > > can you try #include please ? Still doesn't work (same error).

The size_kind change breaks reading of insetgraphics

2002-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
When loading the UserGuide, I get: Unknown token, size_type, skipping. Unknown token, 0, skipping. Unknown token, lyxsize_type, skipping. Unknown token, 0, skipping. Unknown token, size_type, skipping. Unknown token, 0, skipping. Unknown token, lyxsize_type, skipping. Unknown token, 0, skipping.

Re: Using scoped_ptr

2002-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John Levon wrote: > A subtle thing I found out a few weeks ago. You need to have an out of > line dtor for the object that has a scoped_ptr inside it. e.g. > XMiniBuffer needs an outofline dtor because it contains a scoped_ptr as > a member on a forward-declared class The kind of things I cqnnot

Re: RH-7.3 compiling state (and running)

2002-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>I will. Note that the 'ugly' patch you sent earlier did work >>>perfectly. Will you be willing to apply this one if it works? >> > | It does not seem to work very well: > > | gin

Re: qt2 frontend compilation error

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:09:11PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > QCommandBuffer.C:56: no matching function for call to >`QCommandBuffer::setMinimumSize (QSize)' > > > /usr/include/qt/qtoolbar.h:86: candidates are: void >QToolBar::setMinimumSize(int, int) > > > > What Qt version please ? > >

Re: qt2 frontend compilation error

2002-07-22 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:03:59PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:40:14PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > QCommandBuffer.C:56: no matching function for call to >`QCommandBuffer::setMinimumSize (QSize)' > > /usr/include/qt/qtoolbar.h:86: candidates are: void QToolBar::setMin

Re: qt2 frontend compilation error

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:40:14PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > QCommandBuffer.C:56: no matching function for call to >`QCommandBuffer::setMinimumSize (QSize)' > /usr/include/qt/qtoolbar.h:86: candidates are: void QToolBar::setMinimumSize(int, >int) What Qt version please ? We can probably remo

Re: previews, display mode and vertical spacing

2002-07-22 Thread Jules Bean
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:11:19PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > For example, depending on the line length of preceding lines, TeX > either adds \abovedisplayshortskip or \abovedisplayskip. It does not > make sense to reproduce this difference when the line above is not > part of the preview. In

qt2 frontend compilation error

2002-07-22 Thread Dekel Tsur
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../src/ -I../../../src/frontends/ -I../../../images -I./qt2 -I/usr/include/qt -I../../../boost -I../../../src/frontends/controllers -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_GENUINE_STR -O -Wno-non-template-friend -W -Wall -c QComma

Re: lyxconvert script

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:05:29PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > It can be run by the user, but what is the point ? > (though the same can be said on relyx) for i in `ls lotsoflyxfiles/*.lyx`; do lyxconvert $i; done ? > It currently doesn't convert everything, but this can be added cool. A good

Re: RH-7.3 compiling state (and running)

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I will. Note that the 'ugly' patch you sent earlier did work >> perfectly. Will you be willing to apply this one if it works? > | It does not seem to work very well: > | ginette: patch -p0 <~/rh-magic.patch | patchi

[patch] Graphics to use ostream not ostringstream

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
I think this patch should go in: Index: src/graphics/GraphicsConverter.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/graphics/GraphicsConverter.C,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -r1.14 GraphicsConverter.C --- src/grap

Re: IGNORE_CODE

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:04:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > It should be renamed to NOTE_CODE, actually. It is the inset code for > Notes. Oh OK. > >and it > >means that note is disabled permanently in the Qt menus, because > >of the code in getStatus() > > It should not. It is not

Re: lyxconvert script

2002-07-22 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:31:52PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > 2) I am not sure about where to put it. > > I think that the lyxconvert script should be installed in /usr/bin/ > > (the other option is to keep it in LYXDIR/scripts). > > If it's runnable by the user, it should be in /usr/bin/ I > w

Re: IGNORE_CODE

2002-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John Levon wrote: > what is this meant to do ? It is only (?) used for insetnote, It should be renamed to NOTE_CODE, actually. It is the inset code for Notes. > and it > means that note is disabled permanently in the Qt menus, because > of the code in getStatus() It should not. It is not in xf

Re: Edwin's Qt changes

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:58:06PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > xforms' ? I mean Qt's > (I think it's always difficult to have a clear dialog with tons of features. > But we cannot just remove the features.) Yes, it is difficult :) regards john -- "Of all manifestations of power, r

Re: Edwin's Qt changes

2002-07-22 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Levon wrote: > the graphics dialog needs a serious revisit now I think. I don't have > much luck with using it ... xforms' ? No good idea how to improve it. But if you have suggestions... (I think it's always difficult to have a clear dialog with tons of features. But we cannot just remove

Re: Edwin's Qt changes

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:40:19PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > And the graphics dialog (compared to xforms) still lacks a "default" entry in > the display ("Show") choice which takes the value of preferences. the graphics dialog needs a serious revisit now I think. I don't have much lu

Re: Edwin's Qt changes

2002-07-22 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Levon wrote: > I have a couple of comments on things that could still be improved IMHO And the graphics dialog (compared to xforms) still lacks a "default" entry in the display ("Show") choice which takes the value of preferences. Regards, Juergen

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:19:02PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Well, SIGINT is fundamentally a tty signal. You raise it by typing > the interrupt character to the console/tty on which you have started > LyX explicitly. This tty is not necessarily in any way related to the > XServer and/or scr

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:50:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > > This is were we disagree. | > > | > > IMSNHO SIGTERM and SIGINT should behave exactly the same. | > | > Please provide a rati

Edwin's Qt changes

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
I have a couple of comments on things that could still be improved IMHO : 1. Qbibtex style browser. We should use an editable combo box for the style choice instead of the confusing way xforms did it 2. QExternal. can we put the edit/update/view above the template stuff so it's better associate

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread David Kastrup
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:50:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > > This is were we disagree. > > > > IMSNHO SIGTERM and SIGINT should behave exactly the same. > > Please provide a rationale Well, SIGINT is fundamentally a tty signal. You raise

IGNORE_CODE

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
what is this meant to do ? It is only (?) used for insetnote, and it means that note is disabled permanently in the Qt menus, because of the code in getStatus() regards john p.s. what about LFUN_ADD_TO_TOOLBAR ? do we really need a half-baked solution like this, instead of just leaving it down

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:50:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > This is were we disagree. > > IMSNHO SIGTERM and SIGINT should behave exactly the same. Please provide a rationale thanks john -- "Of all manifestations of power, restraint impresses the most." - Thucydides

Re: graphics

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > So it was a patch during code freeze? | > But to a part of LyX that you thought was not under the freeze? | | Lars, as far as I know, these patch have been sent _after_ 1.2.0 | release. So code freeze is irrelev

Re: RH-7.3 compiling state (and running)

2002-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I will. Note that the 'ugly' patch you sent earlier did work > perfectly. Will you be willing to apply this one if it works? It does not seem to work very well: ginette: patch -p0 <~/rh-magic.patch patching file src/BufferView_pimpl.C patch: malformed patch at

Re: graphics

2002-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > So it was a patch during code freeze? > > But to a part of LyX that you thought was not under the freeze? Lars, as far as I know, these patch have been sent _after_ 1.2.0 release. So code freeze is irrelevant in this case. JMarc

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:47:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > Sure we should exit cleanly on SIGTERM or SIGINT, but there should | > _not_ be any user interaction. | | You confused me by confusing SIGTERM and SIGINT. We should not have user

Re: lyxconvert script

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:17:21PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > 1) I am not sure about the name for this script. I think lyxconvert is just fine ... > 2) I am not sure about where to put it. > I think that the lyxconvert script should be installed in /usr/bin/ > (the other option is to keep it in

Re: lyxconvert script

2002-07-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 July 2002 6:17 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote: > I did not put the lyxconvert script in CVS since > 1) I am not sure about the name for this script. > 2) I am not sure about where to put it. > I think that the lyxconvert script should be installed in /usr/bin/ > (the other option is to keep it

lyxconvert script

2002-07-22 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:11:41PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot > Module name: lyx-devel > Repository: lyx-devel/src/support/ > Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/22 19:11:41 > > Modified files: > lyx-devel/src/: ChangeLog buffer.C > l

Re: RH-7.3 compiling state (and running)

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:37:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | I still don't get the advantage of putting pointless empty comments in > | front of ctors and dtors. Can you try to explain this to me again ? > > Either we keep them on _all_ class functions, including dtor and ctor, > or

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:47:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Sure we should exit cleanly on SIGTERM or SIGINT, but there should > _not_ be any user interaction. You confused me by confusing SIGTERM and SIGINT. We should not have user interaction on SIGTERM, on SIGINT we should. > Ther

Re: graphics

2002-07-22 Thread Herbert Voss
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >>>Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >>> >>> >Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >| again and the last time: some more or less importent

Re: graphics

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | again and the last time: some more or less importent | graphics stuff. some of these change

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:02:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> (killall lyx... -> You have unsaved buffer, do you want to save >> them...) > | If you want to lose data exit uncleanly, then SIGKILL is the signal. | SIGTERM should clean up log fil

Re: RH-7.3 compiling state (and running)

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:17:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | Content-Description: RH magic | | I still don't get the advantage of putting pointless empty comments in | front of ctors and dtors. Can you try to explain this to me again ? Eithe

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread Stephan Witt
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:26:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >>>| LyX should quit cleanly in ctrl-c case. I have a patch for it. >>> >>>It cannot quit completely clean... unsaved buffers must be left >>>unsave

Re: RH-7.3 compiling state (and running)

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:17:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Content-Description: RH magic I still don't get the advantage of putting pointless empty comments in front of ctors and dtors. Can you try to explain this to me again ? thanks john -- "Of all manifestations of power, restrai

Re: RH-7.3 compiling state (and running)

2002-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Lars> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | Lars> | Lars> Are you all able to compile and run LyX now without Lars> crashes? (if | Lars> not,

Re: RH-7.3 compiling state (and running)

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Are you all able to compile and run LyX now without crashes? (if | Lars> not, I have a patch for you) | | You mean gc 2.96? Currently I have to compile without any optimi

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:02:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > (killall lyx... -> You have unsaved buffer, do you want to save > them...) If you want to lose data exit uncleanly, then SIGKILL is the signal. SIGTERM should clean up log files, temp files, and for GUI programs, should save

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:26:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> | LyX should quit cleanly in ctrl-c case. I have a patch for it. >> >> It cannot quit completely clean... unsaved buffers must be left >> unsaved. fex. > | We bring up the dialog. T

Re: LFUN_DROP_LAYOUTS_CHOICE

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | How was the holiday ? Super nice! Sailing on a two masted ketch from 1879 for two weeks... -- Lgb

Re: RH-7.3 compiling state (and running)

2002-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Are you all able to compile and run LyX now without crashes? (if Lars> not, I have a patch for you) You mean gc 2.96? Currently I have to compile without any optimization to get it to work, which is not very convenient... The

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:26:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | LyX should quit cleanly in ctrl-c case. I have a patch for it. > > It cannot quit completely clean... unsaved buffers must be left > unsaved. fex. We bring up the dialog. This is the right thing to do IMO. regards john -

Re: C++ question

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 12:35:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > You could do as they do in the stl and take a reference are, but store > the pointer. We should probably introduce a new smartpointer for that > then. > > held_ptr<> perhaps. I like this (though it still means I have to have

Re: LFUN_DROP_LAYOUTS_CHOICE

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:36:00AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | What is the intended use of this ? Can I remove it (one of the best ways > | of supporting something in GUII is to remove it entirely :) > > To be able to open the layout dropdown by a key-bind I guess. Yes, I somehow mis

Re: graphics

2002-07-22 Thread Herbert Voss
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >>>Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>| again and the last time: some more or less importent >>>| graphics stuff. some of these changes are still in >>>| 1.2.1 (vertical lengths) an

Re: keybindings

2002-07-22 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 22 July 2002 16:03, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > But some cleverness is nice. The problem is to mark the border between to be the best and an to be the beast. ;-) -- José Abílio

RH-7.3 compiling state (and running)

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Are you all able to compile and run LyX now without crashes? (if not, I have a patch for you) -- Lgb

Re: keybindings

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars> | This is a bright idea from Lars. A the time I tried to object | Lars> that it | would make more harm than good, but... > | Lars> I am not exactly sure that _this_ is the b

Re: src/stamp-h.inT

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> | Angus Leeming wrote: What's it there for? And why have I got cvs diff giving me: >>> | Lars> | It seems that

Re: lyx-devel src/frontends/qt2/: ChangeLog Menubar_pimpl.C Menuba ...

2002-07-22 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:29:09AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > levon> Log message: several menu improvements. JMarc, I get a crash in > levon> expand when I'm trying to disable a submenu label ... > > Could you elaborate? I haven't spent any time yet looking into why ... > levon>

Re: graphics

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> | again and the last time: some more or less importent >> | graphics stuff. some of these changes are still in >> | 1.2.1 (vertical lengths) and it's very confusing when >> | it

Re: preview...

2002-07-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 July 2002 3:34 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Monday 22 July 2002 2:39 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > > > Possibly an oversight. Does the following help (apart from > > > invalidating the checksum from preview.dtx)? I should probably also > >

Re: lyxrc.show_banner (again, sorry)

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Sorry to bring it up again, but why is this here ? It's not respected in | screen.C, and you can get the same effect simply by removing banner.xpm Which is absolutely not the solution to having a bannerless lyx. Either we alsways show the banner, _or_ we

Re: preview...

2002-07-22 Thread David Kastrup
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 22 July 2002 2:39 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > > Possibly an oversight. Does the following help (apart from > > invalidating the checksum from preview.dtx)? I should probably also > > switch to a typewriter font. > > Nope. Attached is the lat

Re: Is there a better way?

2002-07-22 Thread Herbert Voss
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 04:38:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > yes, do nothing, then they are deleted when the user quits lyx ... >>>That's not elegant at all. >>> > | Does it hurt? It saves a few cycles

Re: keybindings

2002-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | This is a bright idea from Lars. A the time I tried to object Lars> that it | would make more harm than good, but... Lars> I am not exactly sure that _this_ is the bright idea I had... Anyway, are you convinced now that too

Re: src/stamp-h.inT

2002-07-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | Angus Leeming wrote: >>> What's it there for? And why have I got cvs diff giving me: >> Lars> | It seems that it has been here forever, but I suspect that it Lars> | shou

Re: keybindings

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Edwin> I wanted to cut a selection with ctrl+x but didn't notice that | Edwin> caps lock was on. What happend was that > | Edwin> 1. lyx deleted the selection, and 2. inserted a capital

Re: Is there a better way?

2002-07-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 July 2002 3:23 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 04:38:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > >> > yes, do nothing, then they are deleted when the user > >> > quits lyx ... > >> > >> That's not elegant at all. > | > | Do

Re: LyX catches signals, but doesn't remove lyx_tmpdir.

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 05:38:19PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote: > >> a ctrl-C, it tries to make an emergency save, but does not >> remove the lyx_tmpdir. Shouldn't that be done? Especially >> for "safe" signals such as ctrl-C. > | LyX should quit cleanly in ctr

Re: Is there a better way?

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 04:38:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: >> > yes, do nothing, then they are deleted when the user >> > quits lyx ... >> >> That's not elegant at all. > | Does it hurt? It saves a few cycles... And if you run LyX for a _very_ lon

Re: src/stamp-h.inT

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Angus Leeming wrote: >> What's it there for? And why have I got cvs diff giving me: > | It seems that it has been here forever, but I suspect that it | should not. This is something used by automake, I think. Annotations for stamp-h.in *

Re: src/stamp-h.inT

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Angus Leeming wrote: >> What's it there for? And why have I got cvs diff giving me: > | It seems that it has been here forever, but I suspect that it | should not. This is something used by automake, I think. I thought somebody added it to cvs w

Re: preview...

2002-07-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 July 2002 2:39 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > Possibly an oversight. Does the following help (apart from > invalidating the checksum from preview.dtx)? I should probably also > switch to a typewriter font. Nope. Attached is the latex file used to generate the snippets together with th

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

2002-07-22 Thread Herbert Voss
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Andre Poenitz wrote: > >>>On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:41:50AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: >>> I had to make several passes at compiling 3.1 to get LyX-1.2 to compile. The things I added as I went along were

Re: Compiling qt2?

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | John> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:20:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes | John> wrote: >>> I tried for fun to compile with qt2 frontend, and all I got is > | John> one day it will not just be

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

2002-07-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Andre Poenitz wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:41:50AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: >> > I had to make several passes at compiling 3.1 to get LyX-1.2 to compile. >> > The things I added as I went along were objc, --enable-cpp, and >> > --enab

Re: preview...

2002-07-22 Thread David Kastrup
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 22 July 2002 2:19 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > > \label works with \csname. \csname accepts character tokens. This > > includes &$_^{} characters (unless they have been made active and > > redefined). It is quite a bad idea to be using those

Re: previews, display mode and vertical spacing

2002-07-22 Thread Herbert Voss
Angus Leeming wrote: > On Monday 22 July 2002 2:18 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>then something goes wrong in preview.sty or in Angus stuff >>when extracting the ppm-files from the dvi-output. >>All dispayed formulas have an additional space above. >>The inlined ones are always ok. >> > > The add

Re: preview...

2002-07-22 Thread David Kastrup
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 22 July 2002 2:19 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > > \label works with \csname. \csname accepts character tokens. > > This includes &$_^{} characters (unless they have been made active > > and redefined). It is quite a bad idea to be using those >

Re: previews, display mode and vertical spacing

2002-07-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 July 2002 2:18 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > then something goes wrong in preview.sty or in Angus stuff > when extracting the ppm-files from the dvi-output. > All dispayed formulas have an additional space above. > The inlined ones are always ok. The additional space is in the bitmap fil

Re: previews, display mode and vertical spacing

2002-07-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 July 2002 2:11 pm, David Kastrup wrote: . preview.sty goes to some lengths in order to remove the spacing that > for quite a few applications interferes with previews integrating > nicely into the general text layout/line spacing. It would not be as > much a matter of "addition" to p

Re: preview...

2002-07-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 22 July 2002 2:19 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > \label works with \csname. \csname accepts character tokens. This > includes &$_^{} characters (unless they have been made active and > redefined). It is quite a bad idea to be using those characters for > labels, but not necessary illegal.

Re: preview...

2002-07-22 Thread David Kastrup
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > > On Friday 19 July 2002 2:36 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > > > >>Angus Leeming wrote: > >> > >>>On Friday 19 July 2002 2:19 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > >>> > .. fails with labels containing underscores. Just try the > 'scar

Re: previews, display mode and vertical spacing

2002-07-22 Thread Herbert Voss
David Kastrup wrote: Note the extra vertical space inserted in the dvi file between the equation in display mode and the next line of text. >>>this depends to your values of \abovedisplayskip and >>>\belowdisplayskip >>> > > No. yes, we were talking about the dvi output of the doc

Re: previews, display mode and vertical spacing

2002-07-22 Thread David Kastrup
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David, we've been having a discussion about vertical space and previews. To > fill you in and save you from trawling needlessly through the list, here's a > synopsis. > > Attached are two small screenshots, one of the LyX screen wih > previews turned

  1   2   >