Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 01:31:47PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > "lyx -dbg MATHED" provides the attached output.
>
> This is the expected output, most of it coming from reading lib/symbol.
>
> It just looks fine.
>
> > This comes from simpy do "File->New" and the click o
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| lyxfunc.o: In function `LyXFunc::verboseDispatch(kb_action,
| basic_string,
| __default_alloc_template > const &, bool)':
And you did do a autogen of course? And a reconfigure?
--
Lgb
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 07:24:13AM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>
> lyxfunc.o: In function `LyXFunc::verboseDispatch(kb_action, basic_stringstring_char_traits, __default_alloc_template > const &, bool)':
> /usr/src/lyx/lyx-build/src/../../lyx-devel/src/lyxfunc.C:833: undefined reference to
>`Min
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 01:31:47PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> "lyx -dbg MATHED" provides the attached output.
This is the expected output, most of it coming from reading lib/symbol.
It just looks fine.
> This comes from simpy do "File->New" and the click on the mathed icon
> on the icon-taskbar.
lyxfunc.o: In function `LyXFunc::verboseDispatch(kb_action, basic_string, __default_alloc_template > const &, bool)':
/usr/src/lyx/lyx-build/src/../../lyx-devel/src/lyxfunc.C:833: undefined reference to
`MiniBuffer::addSet(basic_string,
__default_alloc_template > const &)'
/usr/src/lyx/lyx-buil
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 05:24:50PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > > There seems to be some problem with the dependency tracking for
> > > recompilation. I've seen similar and a clean recompile helped.
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > The SIGSEGV persist after a "make maintainer-clean"
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:41:24AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Should line 13 in math_decorationinset.C:
>#include
> be replaced by:
>#include
> ?
I replace it with "support/LOstream.h". This includes whatever is
available.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 04:26:54PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> I sent Staffan detailed instructions on how to get the math fonts
> working and he is OK now.
Fine. Thank you.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either o
Hi,
Current CVS:
[...]
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../../boost -isystem
/usr/X11R6/include -g -O -W -Wall -c math_decoratio
ninset.C -Wp,-MD,.deps/math_decorationinset.TPlo
math_decorationinset.C:13: ostream: No such file or directory
gmake[3]: *
bernhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello,
| I'm a fan of Lyx, usually running on Linux. But now Ihave OSX and miss
| Lyx so much. I know there is a version on X on X, but will there be a
| port to native OSX? I think this will be a nice thing for Tex users on
| OSX, and there are only few Fro
Hello,
I'm a fan of Lyx, usually running on Linux. But now Ihave OSX and miss
Lyx so much. I know there is a version on X on X, but will there be a
port to native OSX? I think this will be a nice thing for Tex users on
OSX, and there are only few Frontends, but noone is as good as Lyx! I
hope
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:26:29AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
>
>
>> So, I'm in favor of renaming it if a consistent, non-ambiguous solution
>> can be found. Keep in mind the fact that if one inserts a
>> Insert->Floats->Table, one then needs to inser
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:26:29AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
> So, I'm in favor of renaming it if a consistent, non-ambiguous solution
> can be found. Keep in mind the fact that if one inserts a
> Insert->Floats->Table, one then needs to insert a Insert->Table into it.
> That's a bit too ambi
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 02:58:36PM +0300, Staffan Ringbom wrote:
> Since roughly 3 weeks there has been a change in the code, which makes
> it impossible to view the math-formulas on screen. (Scaling the fonts
> doesn't seem to help either)
Is this still present?
Andre'
--
Those who desire t
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, robin wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> >JMarc suggested I ask here about this terminology. My question is, what
> >is our justificatino for exposing the user to the unusual formulation
> >"Tabular Material", or the even worse "Tabular" ?
> >
> Beats me.
This is another of those
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 04:48:16PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> A quick look at these files suggests that you're going to get these insets
> working inside mathed and then replace the existing InsetRef et al with the
> new scheme.
It currently is just "additional functionality" for mathed, but
On Monday 24 June 2002 6:51 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
> Module name: lyx-devel
> Repository: lyx-devel/src/mathed/
> Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]02/06/24 17:51:35
>
> Modified files:
> lyx-devel/src/mathed/: Makefile.am formulabase.C ma
Hi,
I noticed a difference how the filename in different converters
handled.
In the epstoxpm converter $$i points to the original file in the
source directory. In the epstopdf converter $$i points to a temporary
file. Why this difference? If I wrote my own converter I have no
chance to get the pa
On Monday 24 June 2002 3:02 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> | Asger Kunuk Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | | It seems that the changes Juergen and I did to the minibuffer from
> | | Porto has not been included?
> | | We did rework a
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:10:31PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>> Current CVS is compeltely unusable with that "feature"
>
| Maybe some more information: I am running fvwm2 and the problem is not just
| with LyX-internal windows but with overlapping "e
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 24 June 2002 2:10 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | ??? It does.
>>
>> Then what it the problem with distributing an up to date form_about.c?
>>
>> | Not only does all work perfectly for me, but the Makefile.am
>> | looks fine too. However,
On Monday 24 June 2002 2:10 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | ??? It does.
>
> Then what it the problem with distributing an up to date form_about.c?
>
> | Not only does all work perfectly for me, but the Makefile.am
> | looks fine too. However, I'm no expert and you are. Could you have a look
>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:11:43PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | It seems that the changes Juergen and I did to the minibuffer from
> | Porto has not been included?
> | We did rework all of these methods...
>
> Hmm... I did apply the complete diff...
> I can check against what I have in t
Asger Kunuk Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It seems that the changes Juergen and I did to the minibuffer from
| Porto has not been included?
| We did rework all of these methods...
Hmm... I did apply the complete diff...
I can check against what I have in the Porto CVS repository.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:10:31PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> Current CVS is compeltely unusable with that "feature"
Maybe some more information: I am running fvwm2 and the problem is not just
with LyX-internal windows but with overlapping "external" windows, too.
I even get a completely grey
Is anything being done about the massive redraw problems (parts of the main
window do not get updated when they should).
Current CVS is compeltely unusable with that "feature"
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either o
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 24 June 2002 1:28 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Monday 24 June 2002 11:28 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> | All the forms/form_*.[Ch] fi
It seems that the changes Juergen and I did to the minibuffer from
Porto has not been included?
We did rework all of these methods...
Greets,
Asger
On Monday 24 June 2002 1:28 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Monday 24 June 2002 11:28 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> | All the forms/form_*.[Ch] files are now autogenerated. As such, you'll
> >> |
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 08:42:19AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | More informed bug reports are welcome.
>>
>> Meaning that my report is wrong or that you want more details?
>
| More details. But looking it's obvious - your WM doesn't do saveund
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 24 June 2002 11:28 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | All the forms/form_*.[Ch] files are now autogenerated. As such, you'll
>> | probably find them in your build tree, not your src tree.
>>
>> One
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:05:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> It is not very nice to have this hardcoded in the LyX sources.
I know.
> can't you do it in external scripts, like the first implementation ?
The external scripts would have to re-create the structure used within
mathed (more or less
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 07:43:51AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> You basically have to add a function 'mathematicize' (or whatever) to every
> math inset (or at least to the ones you are interested in) and there you
> put code to transform the inset into Mma syntax. Usually you should be able
> to
On Monday 24 June 2002 12:27 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > How was the extended holiday?
>
> Nice indeed.
>
> And shame on you people that you did not show up.
Shame indeed. I worked till 2am every night that weekend on a grant proposal
that should have been done weeks before. The deadline was 8p
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:42:40AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> [...]
> And now we're going to need such an approach for the splash screen it would
> appear. Yes such a thing is possible. Yes, I'll concentrate on it.
That's a good thing to hear.
> [...]
> How was the extended holiday?
Nice in
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:29:52AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> 1. What is wrong with forcing the users to install fdesign? It's the
> appropriate compilation tool. (You insist on a C== compiler for .C code...)
> In effect, you are special-casing the xforms frontend. The qt frontend will
> req
On Monday 24 June 2002 12:02 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 08:42:19AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > | More informed bug reports are welcome.
> >
> > Meaning that my report is wrong or that you want more details?
>
> More details. But looking it's obvious - your WM doesn't
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:16:10PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> I was actually referring to myself here not you. But it works either
> way.
heh
> I scroll to where I am working and edit there. There is no going back
> because I don't need to -- I rarely use bookmarks in emacs and have
> never fe
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 08:42:19AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | More informed bug reports are welcome.
>
> Meaning that my report is wrong or that you want more details?
More details. But looking it's obvious - your WM doesn't do saveunders
for menus, and we're not doing the copy of th
On Monday 24 June 2002 11:23 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> PS: Since I have you on the line: Would it be possible to separate the
> graphics loading in some low-level and some high-level part? I need just
> the "load a graphics and give me an ('owning') handle" (i.e. low-level)
> part and I do /not/
On Monday 24 June 2002 11:28 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | All the forms/form_*.[Ch] files are now autogenerated. As such, you'll
> | probably find them in your build tree, not your src tree.
>
> One note though... I do not agree to when this is gen
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 05:24:50PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > There seems to be some problem with the dependency tracking for
> > recompilation. I've seen similar and a clean recompile helped.
>
> Nope.
>
> The SIGSEGV persist after a "make maintainer-clean" and even after
> a complete fresh do
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:14:04AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I looked in either. Some of the form_*.[Ch] were there, some not (_about*
> > was missing, too)
>
> You mean both...
I looked in both. That should include either, shouldn't it?
> Linguistic splitting of hairs aside,
Oh... ;-}
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| All the forms/form_*.[Ch] files are now autogenerated. As such, you'll
| probably find them in your build tree, not your src tree.
One note though... I do not agree to when this is generated, now you
generate upon compile, right? It should be done on
On Monday 24 June 2002 11:16 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:58:44AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > All the forms/form_*.[Ch] files are now autogenerated. As such, you'll
> > probably find them in your build tree, not your src tree.
>
> I looked in either. Some of the form_*
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:05:32AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Attached is a small LyX document who's mathed rendering is broken with
> current cvs. Attached also are a couple of screen shots of the old and new
> appearances.
>
> Any ideas, André?
My first idea was to have a look as soon as
Attached is a small LyX document who's mathed rendering is broken with
current cvs. Attached also are a couple of screen shots of the old and new
appearances.
Any ideas, André?
Angus
#LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 220
\textclass article
\language
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:58:44AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> All the forms/form_*.[Ch] files are now autogenerated. As such, you'll
> probably find them in your build tree, not your src tree.
I looked in either. Some of the form_*.[Ch] were there, some not (_about*
was missing, too)
Anyway.
On Monday 24 June 2002 11:04 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Can anybody please explain to me in simple words the variable naming in the
> following snippet taken from FormDialog.C?
>
> void UserCache::add(uid_t ID) const
> {
> string pszNewName;
> [...]
>
> It a
Hi,
I had a bit of a problem with the lyx configure script on a cygwin
environment.
The following check only works if the sh shell points to the bash
shell.
### Adjust PATH for Win32 (Cygwin)
if test "x$OSTYPE" = xcygwin; then
echo "configure: cygwin detected; path correction"
srcdir=`cygpat
Can anybody please explain to me in simple words the variable naming in the
following snippet taken from FormDialog.C?
void UserCache::add(uid_t ID) const
{
string pszNewName;
[...]
It almost made me spill tea over the keyboard together with some
On Monday 24 June 2002 10:37 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | I thought I'd try and move the minibuffer behind the frontends firewall
> | and so had a look at which functions are used by the "general public". It
> | transpires that only addSet and getS
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I thought I'd try and move the minibuffer behind the frontends firewall and
| so had a look at which functions are used by the "general public". It
| transpires that only addSet and getString are used.
>
| I propose, therefore, getting rid entirely of
I thought I'd try and move the minibuffer behind the frontends firewall and
so had a look at which functions are used by the "general public". It
transpires that only addSet and getString are used.
I propose, therefore, getting rid entirely of LyXView::getMiniBuffer() and
replacing it with two
On Monday 24 June 2002 7:56 am, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do:
>
> $ ./autogen.sh
> $ ./configure --with-frontend=qt2 \
> --with-qt2-includes=/usr/X11R6/include/qt2 \
> --with-qt2-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib
>
> which ends with:
>
> [...]
> checking for X11/forms.h... no
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 10:47:31PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> Should I kill screen-recenter to allow M-x for accessing the minibuffer
>> ?
>
| What is 'screen-recenter' supposed to do?
Ctrl-l
Scroll the screen so that the cursor is at the middle
(top
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| here comes a total diff of my graphics stuff, which I posted more
| than one time to the list in smaller pieces! It fixes several bugs.
>
| If no one is interested then let it be ...
Did you ever answer Jean-Marcs question about changeExtension? (i.e.
I
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 11:49:11AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > CVS 1.3.0 as of June 19th. Do following:
> >
> > 1. Start LyX
> > 2. File -> New
> > 3. Insert mathed with, for example, the math tool
> >
> > kaboom: SIGSEGV!!
>
> There seems to be some problem with t
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 10:47:31PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Should I kill screen-recenter to allow M-x for accessing the minibuffer
> ?
What is 'screen-recenter' supposed to do?
Andr'e
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, eithe
here comes a total diff of my graphics stuff, which I posted more
than one time to the list in smaller pieces! It fixes several bugs.
If no one is interested then let it be ...
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
Index: src/ChangeLog
=
60 matches
Mail list logo
