Hello,
just a short report of successful installating lyx-1.2.0pre1 on Linux
(Debian 3.0, gcc 2.95.4) : ./configure ; make ; make install works
fine.
As previously noted, the bind/*.bind files are not exactly
compatible, and I got some complains about some functions not
existing anymor
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 01-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Pre2 will certainly have the documentation included.
-- Lgb
>> | It might work better to provide a separate tar ball
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | I already unmade many of these nice "optimizations" in
Lars> lib/Makefile.am | a week ago...
Lars> Meaning?
Meaning you went a bit overboard in your 25/03 commit: changing
${srcdir} to $(srcdir) is a good idea, changing $${
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> At this stage we should not fix stuff that has "annoyed people
Lars> for a long time", not even for a loong time. At this
Lars> stage we should fix regressions, crashes etc. Not old missing
Lars> features.
Nobody e
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 06:13:36PM +0200, Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> I have just finished the Danish translation of lyx 1.2.0pre1 and mailed
> it to Lars (did I win the price for fast response? :) )
Sure.
Now if you'd proceed with the remaining languages, please ;-}
> I found to strings that I do
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 01:55:22PM -0500, Huntsinger, Reid wrote:
> (These seem to involve characters TeX reserves, for example putting any of
> {$, %, #, @} in a sub- or super-script will cause a crash). Also, selecting
> "Bibliography" has the same effect.
I have never seen a similar report.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 09:54:32PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> The circumflex in math lacks one line which AFAIK was there at some
> point in time, but has somehow disappeared from CVS. And it doesn't
> work (just try the sub-panel item under Misc).
>
> Applying this patch will get it into pro
On 01-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Pre2 will certainly have the documentation included.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lgb
>| It might work better to provide a separate tar ball for the docs with a
>| make install. At least until 1.2.final.
>
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 06:41:55PM +0200, Eran Tromer wrote:
> Type "\newcommand{\foo}{\bar}", select it and press C-m.
> LyX crashes.
>
> Likewise if you replace "\bar" by other commands that have arguments,
> like "\vec", or "\frac".
Hm... this is because the parser looks for \bar's argument.
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
> if you want to know what users want to know ...
>
> http://www.lyx.org/help/statistic.php
Nice, although there are a few lines where you are not meeting the
w3c standard of quoting string arguements. Very nice though.
It seems that people want to know
The attached simple patch re-establishes earlier behaviour where
it was possible to build lyx without a po/POTFILES.in present.
The trick is to make the newer code in gettext.m4 think that a
valid po/POTFILES.in exists so it will generate po/Makefile. Then
remove po/POTFILES.in and when you run
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > My emacs (20.7 --- bang up to date?) doesn't have them either.
Emacs-21.1 has them and a whole lot more in a whitespace.el file.
It seems to work okay with XEmacs-21.4.6 so there is some good news.
Allan. (ARRae)
You probably have a user-customized default.ui in ~/.lyx/ui.
Rename your .lyx directory to .lyx-116 and try again.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 08:10:51PM +0200, Niklaus Giger wrote:
> -- Forwarded Message --
>
> Subject: Re: ftp lyx-1.2.0pre1
> Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 19:00:26 +0200
At 11:49 PM 4/1/02 +0100, you wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:26:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > | Either way, of course, I wasn't suggesting it needs to be fixed for 1.2
> > | ...
> >
> > Then mark it as "later" in bugzilla.
> > or with a milestone of 1.3.0CVS
>
>Maybe we've been
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:26:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Either way, of course, I wasn't suggesting it needs to be fixed for 1.2
> | ...
>
> Then mark it as "later" in bugzilla.
> or with a milestone of 1.3.0CVS
Maybe we've been using bugzilla differently. To me, a bug without a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> | On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 12:12:06AM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
for i in $(files) ; do \ /usr/bin/install -c -m 64
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 05:09:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> Lars> When I see you begin working on "bugs" that have not been
>> Lars> reported earlier, even things that are not really bugs, but
>> Lars> missing features then I reserve the rig
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Sure but people
| Lars> keep on pissing around with, for example, the | build. You
| Lars> really have no right at all to criticise
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
| Lars> +2002-03-28 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | + | + * lyxlength.C:
| Lars> compatibility stuff for < 1.1.6fix4 and | + "o
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Pre2 will certainly have the documentation included.
>>
>> --
>> Lgb
| It might work better to provide a separate tar ball for the docs with a
| make install. At least until 1.2.final.
Perhaps.
Other opinions?
--
Lgb
On Monday 25 March 2002 05:08 am, you wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > In normal 1.1.6, this icon stands for maths... But now, I cannot see
> > what it means.
>
> AFAIK it's an abacus (or slide rule or how do you math guys call that?)
abacus it is, note that abacus != slide rule
Cheers,
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: ftp lyx-1.2.0pre1
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 19:00:26 +0200
From: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
On Sunday, 31. March 2002 13.43, you wrote:
> On ftp.devel.lyx.org:/pub/lyx/lyx-1.2.0pre1.tar.gz
>
> N
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 05:09:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Lars> When I see you begin working on "bugs" that have not been
> Lars> reported earlier, even things that are not really bugs, but
> Lars> missing features then I reserve the right to comment.
And then contrast that with yo
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 12:12:06AM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
>>> for i in $(files) ; do \ /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./$i
>>> /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/u
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Sure but people
Lars> keep on pissing around with, for example, the | build. You
Lars> really have no right at all to criticise me when you've | been
Lars> applying your own experimental
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> +2002-03-28 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | + | + * lyxlength.C:
Lars> compatibility stuff for < 1.1.6fix4 and | + "old" 1.2.0 files
Lars> which use c%, l%, p% t% instead of t
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 12:12:06AM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
>> for i in $(files) ; do \
>>/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./$i
>/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/share/lyx/reLyX/$i ; \
>> done
>> /bin/sh: files: command not found
>
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| And after installation when trying to load any of the documentation
| from the "Help" menu:
>
| -- snip -
| [pseelig]~ > lyx
| reLyX directory not found.
| LyX: unable to find documentation file `FAQ'. Bad installation?
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Sure but people keep on pissing around with, for example, the
| build. You really have no right at all to criticise me when you've
| been applying your own experimental patches to the tree.
When I see you begin working on "bugs" that have not been reporte
29 matches
Mail list logo
