At 11:49 PM 4/1/02 +0100, you wrote: >On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:26:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > > | Either way, of course, I wasn't suggesting it needs to be fixed for 1.2 > > | ... > > > > Then mark it as "later" in bugzilla. > > or with a milestone of 1.3.0CVS > >Maybe we've been using bugzilla differently
Here's how I understand it from how the GNOME, redhat and Mozilla guys use it. A target milestone means, This bug will be fixed in release X. No milestone means, it's a bug. We will fix it, just don't know when. LATER, means. I don't consider this important at all, It will be fixed at some indefinite later date. though probably only accidentally. Also, target milestones should probably be releases rather than CVS. Shall we have an official policy about this one? Cheers Koz "Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage, and those who manage what they do not understand."
