On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 08:08:52AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Yes, and I want to use them properly. So what I am supposed to do? Use
> /always/ 8-character-tabs, even if the rest of the "paragraph" seems to
> be intended with 4 characters?
>
> Thanks,
> Jürgen
no, keep to the style
Am Montag, 17. September 2001 18:06 schrieb John Levon:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:34:53PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > Sorry. I corrected this. There are some places where
> > 4-character-indentation is used, though
> > (FormDocument::class_update). I handled it the same there.
>
> al
On Die, 2001-09-18 at 01:24, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | | However, similar references should be written as:
> | |
> | | ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_mandir}/man?/*
> | |
> | | because on some systems it's /usr/man and on some /usr/share/man
> |
On Die, 2001-09-18 at 02:55, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:15:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | However, similar references should be written as:
> > |
> > | ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_mandir}/man?/*
> > |
> > |
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:24:15AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | | However, similar references should be written as:
> | |
> | | ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_mandir}/man?/*
> | |
> | | because on some systems it's /usr/man and on some /usr/
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:08:37AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> ...
> -%attr(-,root,root) /usr/bin/*
> -%attr(-,root,root) /usr/man/*
> -%attr(-,root,root) /usr/share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/*
> -%attr(-,root,root) /usr/share/lyx
> -%attr(-,roo
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:15:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | However, similar references should be written as:
> |
> | ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_mandir}/man?/*
> |
> | because on some systems it's /usr/man and on some /usr/share/man
>
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:35:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Yes but the limit tends towards a specific value. So we can keep going forever,
> | but there is an upper limit...
>
> So you clam that the process will stop, ... but it will take forever?
it won't stop, we'll just get clo
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:07:20PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:03:38PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> >
> > I'm ranting about this for the third time already, but obviously nobody
> > wants to take my spec files and make this as it should be.
>
> I'm taking this
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:03:38PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> I'm ranting about this for the third time already, but obviously nobody
> wants to take my spec files and make this as it should be.
>
I'm taking this back. I've just seen in another message that Kayvan is
working on this.
C
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:53:02PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I also think that the:
>
> "gzip -f9 ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/man/man?/*"
>
> should be done by the "make install".
>
First of all, this shouldn't be done at all. RPM does this automatically
for man pages.
However, simila
Please hold off on this.
I have been swamped, but I have a whole host of cleanups for lyx.spec.in,
thanks to Zvezdan. It's been just a bit crazier than usual recently.
By the way, I got stopped today on the way into work this morning (I
was driving a recently purchased SUV without plates, close
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 08:26:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | bugs in the code is finite. So there is some hope that the list will
> | shrink eventually :-)
>
> Nah "There is always one more bug!"
Yes but the limit tends towards a specific value. So we can keep going forever,
but
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 06:59:50PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> there were two footnote packages, the one of robin fairbanks
> is now footmisc, the otherone is afaik no more part of the
> tools package.
Mark Wooding's footnote.sty is still a part of mdwtools.
> anyway, with package tabularx foot
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I don't know, I see you all busy modifying the interface (note that I
> > am not complaining). It is the last missing popup, along with SendTo,
> > which will require more work. I think somebody claimed ownership of
> > that, but I forgot who.
>
> So,
On Monday 17 September 2001 18:06, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > > I don't know, I see you all busy modifying the interface (note that I
> > > am not complaining). It is the last missing popup, along with SendTo,
> > > which will require more work. I think somebody claimed ownership of
> > > that, but I
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:13:52PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > > If a footnote is used inside a tabular which is
> > > - outside floats
> > > - not in a minipage
> > > - no long-tabular
> > > the following two lines have to be inserted to the preamble (according
> > > to
> > I don't know, I see you all busy modifying the interface (note that I
> > am not complaining). It is the last missing popup, along with SendTo,
> > which will require more work. I think somebody claimed ownership of
> > that, but I forgot who.
>
> Edwin.
I did indeed. But I am unfortunately v
On Monday 17 September 2001 17:38, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> On Monday 17 September 2001 16:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> Angus> Rob, how often have
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 06:38:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I don't know, I see you all busy modifying the interface (note that I
> am not complaining). It is the last missing popup, along with SendTo,
> which will require more work. I think somebody claimed ownership of
> that, but I
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 05:43:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Rob, how often have you been told that the label button isn't
> Angus> one or ours? It's an autogenerated form from the xforms
> Angus> library. One day i
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:34:53PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Sorry. I corrected this. There are some places where
> 4-character-indentation is used, though (FormDocument::class_update).
> I handled it the same there.
all it needs is for someone who can commit to convert all the file
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:13:52PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > If a footnote is used inside a tabular which is
> > - outside floats
> > - not in a minipage
> > - no long-tabular
> > the following two lines have to be inserted to the preamble (according
> > to Dekel):
> > \usepackage{footnote}
>
On Monday 17 September 2001 16:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Rob, how often have you been told that the label button isn't
> Angus> one or ours? It's an autogenerated form from the xforms
> Angus> library. One day it'll be
On Monday 17 September 2001 16:21, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Angus,
>
> Do you remember we set up this "dialog iconizes with main" toggle
> feature in preferences?
>
> Not all dialogs comply to that:
>
> * (Error) Messages.
> Makes sense, since this way they always stay on-top of main.
Here it
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It works like a charm here.
Hooray!!!
> Note that I have not commented out/removed the Splash dialog code in the
> patch, so two pixmaps are displayed currently, slightly offset.
Remove the splash dialog code! I don't want to see this anymore! Oh, my
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> Michael Schmidt wrote:
> - It seems like "Wide figures" do not work with option "Here,
> definitely" (at least in the article class without additional
> flags/options). If that is generally true, the option should not be
> allowed for them.
>
> (At least) figure*
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> Just to remind you that this issue is still unsolved ;-)
> If a footnote is used inside a tabular which is
> - outside floats
> - not in a minipage
> - no long-tabular
> the following two lines have to be inserted to the preamble (according
> to Dekel):
> \usepacka
Just to remind you that this issue is still unsolved ;-)
If a footnote is used inside a tabular which is
- outside floats
- not in a minipage
- no long-tabular
the following two lines have to be inserted to the preamble (according
to Dekel):
\usepackage{footnote}
\makesavenoteenv{tabular}
Else yo
Finally! What a relieve! :-)
Being just a humble user of LyX (who actually largely prefers XEmacs
with AUCTeX/RefTeX), i probably deserve no right at all to speak out
on such matters but i just can't let this go by uncommented.
Angus is addressing a topic which is most annoying in recent moder
Michael Schmidt wrote:
- It seems like "Wide figures" do not work with option "Here,
definitely" (at least in the article class without additional
flags/options). If that is generally true, the option should not be
allowed for them.
(At least) figure* and table* only work if the line
\restyl
On 17-Sep-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Here's the fdesign stuff ;-) I just need the appropriate
> Angus> ParagraphParameters.
>
> Concerning the LaTeX output, remember that we want a reasonable
> environment rather than
On Monday 17 September 2001 11:26, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 17-Sep-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Jürgen, IF you'd like to put the ability to modify the width of an
individual
> > paragraph back into LyX, then I'm happy to give it a frontend. Duncan
Simpson
> > suggested that the best LaTeX
Hello again,
menu item "Note..." should be replaced by "Note". I tried to find all
places in the code where this string occurs. Could you please have a look
at the patch below and apply it if it is correct/complete?
Many thanks, Michael
PS: The patched files refer to "src/ext_l10n.h:120". I ca
On 17-Sep-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jürgen, IF you'd like to put the ability to modify the width of an individual
> paragraph back into LyX, then I'm happy to give it a frontend. Duncan Simpson
> suggested that the best LaTeX for the problem is:
>
> ERT inset
> {\leftskip=2cm
> \rightskip=
On 17-Sep-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| I just don't get it?
>
> the same extra parameters was used for different things depending on
> the value of the other extra parameters.
So you say if I reimplement this with clean parameters then it wouldn't
be a hack anymore?
Jürgen
--
-
On Monday 17 September 2001 10:25, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 17-Sep-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > All the paragraph extra stuff was a hack.
> > (and this is why it is so excruciatingly hard to get rid of it)
>
> Could you explain why it was a hack in your opinion? Because we used
> some
Hi,
could somebody please apply the little patch below? My current email
address will become invalid by the end of September.
Just a little reminder:
There are only 11 days left on which I can assist you by running
Purify. So this is definitely the right time to fix all memory leaks
and
On 17-Sep-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> All the paragraph extra stuff was a hack.
> (and this is why it is so excruciatingly hard to get rid of it)
Could you explain why it was a hack in your opinion? Because we used
some more paragraph-params? Because we had a visual feedback on screen?
B
People have been complaining about the Splash dialog since the beginning of
time. It obsures other popups. It appears on all virtual desktops on KDE. It
does other nasty things with other window managers.
This small patch (attached) will allow us to get rid of the Splash dialog
entirely. Inste
As proposed by JMarc, I removed the annoying AskQuestion when changing
the class in Layout -> Document. Instead I implemented a button "Reset"
(to class defaults) and a checkbox "Auto Reset" (to class defaults).
Furthermore I removed the irritating menu entry "Save as class
defaults" in "Layou
Is the anoncvs.lyx.org still down? Login attempts hang, but ping
works.
cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/lyx/cvsroot login
Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
CVS password:
HANGS HERE after password given!!
Also anonncvs.us.lyx.org is denying access. H
On 10-Sep-2001 Garst R. Reese wrote:
>> Not that I'm saying it can't/won't go back. I really can't remember the
>> details of the discussion.
>>
>> A.
> If it was in, it was not there for long. I often used either verse or
> quote (or is it quotation) to get an indented paragraph before minipag
43 matches
Mail list logo
