at my (slightly out of date) mirror you can find a css based www.lyx.org
http://www.koziarski.org/LyX/www-user/
All the formatting (on the front page at least, haven't fixed LDN or
/news.inc) is done with CSS instead of http://www.koziarski.org/LyX/www-user/?nocss=1
I'd appreciate any reports
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 08:57:37PM -0400, Sanjay Vohra wrote:
> hi
> im tryign to get this ver 1.6.fix2 to work on a sun solaris 2.7
> and get the following errors after make, can you help me out?
>
> # make
> Making all in intl
> Making all in po
> Making all in sigc++
> make all-recursive
> M
hi
im tryign to get this ver 1.6.fix2 to work on a sun solaris 2.7
and get the following errors after make, can you help me out?
# make
Making all in intl
Making all in po
Making all in sigc++
make all-recursive
Making all in macros
m4 -I./macros macros/basic_signal.h.m4 > basic_signal.h
m4: b
My concern is more that many of the ridiculous quests relate to support
for an out-of-date toolkit or, lord help us, GUII.
Aren't these distractions interrelated?
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 07:59:57PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > -
Does anyone have any suggestions for this Redhat 7.1 user?
He is trying to build lyx from the SRPM and having problems.
He is using xforms-0.88-3 (I think!) with the following g++ version:
[root@elon Linux]# g++ -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 09:04:56AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> then, I believe, it is a tragic, even unethical choice.
/now/ I am pissed off. "Unethical" ? It is only because this is a family
mailing list
john
--
"Someone turn off the good idea tap; we're drowning here!"
-
My LyX 1.1.6fix2 for Win32 does not seem to run bibtex at all after
the first latex run, although it runs latex for 3 times.
I had no problems inserting the bibtex references and citations, and
my .bib file is in the same directory as my .lyx file.
When I do a manual latex-bibtex-latex-latex seque
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - resources wasted on a ridiculous quest for GUII
We waste resources on a lot of other ridiculous quests.
I'm surprised you are only bitching about the GUII stuff.
Come on, you can do better.
Greets,
Asger
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 03:44:27PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> I suppose I should make it clear that IMHO Larry has some very good
> points. I just don't see the point in another debate that will change
> nothing.
>
> And I don't agree with him on everything; in particular, the GUII work
> so far
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 09:31:05AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
>
> Why does it matter to you to use KDE and not Xforms? What is so
> pressing, so important that the GUI will be done in some other toolkit
> now and not in XForms?
If you are attributing a preference to KDE to me, you're mistaken.
I
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> First: I must be mad to answer this question. Believe me... :-)
>
> Second: Larry objection has a base, we talk about GUII for years and we
> don't have a working basis, yet. Also, for those who remember Larry pr
* Marcello Nuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010610 15:09]:
> Hi all,
> just a little question: why the versioning scheme of LyX is not as follows?
>
> 1.5.0 instead of 1.1.5
> 1.5.1 " 1.1.5fix1
> 1.5.2 " 1.1.5fix2
> 1.6.0 " 1.1.6
> 1.6.1 " 1.1.6fix1
> ...
FWIW, I understand the criticism, I don't like XForms too much myself
but installing f.ex. KDE instead is just too much just to have kde-LyX
At least XForms is small as opposed to one of the giants that could
replace it. I'm well aware that we can do just Qt but then we still have
some layer or
Hi all,
just a little question: why the versioning scheme of LyX is not as follows?
1.5.0 instead of 1.1.5
1.5.1 " 1.1.5fix1
1.5.2 " 1.1.5fix2
1.6.0 " 1.1.6
1.6.1 " 1.1.6fix1
...
this would take much more sense to me for the following reasons:
1) y
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 05:32:26AM +0100 or thereabouts, John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 04:27:49PM +1200, Michael Koziarski wrote:
>
> > 4) Add Web Frontend to database allowing logged in users to add news.
>
> why would we want this ? What is the failing with current CVS based sy
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 09:31:05AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
>
> Why does it matter to you to use KDE and not Xforms? What is so
> pressing, so important that the GUI will be done in some other toolkit
> now and not in XForms?
First: I must be mad to answer this question. Believe me... :-)
16 matches
Mail list logo
