FWIW, I understand the criticism, I don't like XForms too much myself
but installing f.ex. KDE instead is just too much just to have kde-LyX
At least XForms is small as opposed to one of the giants that could
replace it. I'm well aware that we can do just Qt but then we still have
some layer or we lose some benefits.
* Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010610 15:09]:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 09:31:05AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> >
> > Why does it matter to you to use KDE and not Xforms? What is so
> > pressing, so important that the GUI will be done in some other toolkit
> > now and not in XForms?
>
> First: I must be mad to answer this question. Believe me... :-)
>
> Second: Larry objection has a base, we talk about GUII for years and we
> don't have a working basis, yet. Also, for those who remember Larry proposed
> the ERT inset since 1996 (IIRC), so he is an old time supporter. It is good
> to have you around Larry. :-)
>
> Third: for the better or worse, lyx is the only xforms application I have
> in my computer.
>
> I understand most of the reasons why this happens, and I agree with most of
> them, but I just want to be fair with Larry.
>
> > --
> > Baruch Even
> > http://baruch.ev-en.org/
>
> --
> José
--
Baruch Even
http://baruch.ev-en.org/
